Queen making music on a album with Adam Lambert why not?

Many people have aversion to the idea of Queen and Adam making an actual album together
But they think it ok for Adam to provide a way of them still doing Queen tours
But I say in the end what's the problem if Queen does make an album with Adam as vocalist
I mean it is not going to change anything
We all know Queen is really Queen only with Freddie
But what would be the harm if Queen did a real new album and with all new music with Adam

It's either that or Just Brian and Rogers future solo stuff
I mean they don't even work on anything together new music wise
And wouldn't it be interesting to hear some new Brian and Roger fresh music?

I wouldn't mind them doing an album with Marc Martel either
But if the only way to ever hear any May Taylor new musical collaborations is by Adam, then why not.
There is no other way to get anything new from them unless they do an album with another vocalists anyway.

So I say let them do it.

I think they may record a track, possibly dragon attack on his forthcoming album, but I'd have no interest in a whole Queen+Glambo album, I think the future will see another Brian/Kerry album & tour, a future Brian solo album, Roger...who knows ?

andyb1968 wrote:

I think they may record a track, possibly dragon attack on his forthcoming album, but I'd have no interest in a whole Queen+Glambo album, I think the future will see another Brian/Kerry album & tour, a future Brian solo album, Roger...who knows ?

Well if they don't do it
You will never know what it could have been
That's my attitude
So it's better that they do it than not do it.

All this argument about replacing Freddie is very silly
As you could only replace Freddie with Adam IF Freddie was still here to replace.

And obviously IF Freddie was still here I for one would never want Queen to get rid of him and replace him with Adam or anyone else!

But Freddie is not here to be replaced.
So Adam Can NEVER replace Freddie
As Freddie is not here to replace
But that does not mean
we should not have the chance to hear new music
Co written by Roger and Brian, even if Adam is singing the main vocals.

In the words of Freddie. . .

"it's only a bloody album, people get so excited about these things"

Out of context maybe, it was said about Hot Space, but you could apply the same thinking to the idea of AL recording with BM and RT. Those who like it will buy it, those that don't won't . And I agree he, like Paul Rodgers, wouldn't be replacing Freddie.

Vocal harmony wrote:

In the words of Freddie. . .

"it's only a bloody album, people get so excited about these things"

Out of context maybe, it was said about Hot Space, but you could apply the same thinking to the idea of AL recording with BM and RT. Those who like it will buy it, those that don't won't . And I agree he, like Paul Rodgers, wouldn't be replacing Freddie.

Yes
But I really would prefer the other thing in the end if it was possible using the tech to make any new music with the library of Freddie's voice sounds.

You know, I dont care if they record with Adam or not. As long as it is not released under the Queen (+) banner I am ok with it. BM and RT are only 50% Queen. I also have the same feelings with The Who for instance.

Ron wrote:

You know, I dont care if they record with Adam or not. As long as it is not released under the Queen (+) banner I am ok with it. BM and RT are only 50% Queen. I also have the same feelings with The Who for instance.

Well that is up to them, nothing can stop them.

A M L
R M T
B H M

Anagram that?
BRA HAMMER & METAL?
Good name that they could call themselves that.

They could indeed scrape the barrel a little further in a shameless attempt to stay relevant, or for Brian to try to get his No1 single in every decade since the 1970s, but I can't imagine the artistic quality of the album would be very high. In Paul Rodgers they had an accomplished songwriter and musician and yet TCR was average and unmemorable, with Brian in particular very disappointing (bog standard 12-bar on Still Burnin, for example). Unfortunately I fear the well is now dry :(

Holly2003 wrote:

They could indeed scrape the barrel a little further in a shameless attempt to stay relevant, or for Brian to try to get his No1 single in every decade since the 1970s, but I can't imagine the artistic quality of the album would be very high. In Paul Rodgers they had an accomplished songwriter and musician and yet TCR was average and unmemorable, with Brian in particular very disappointing (bog standard 12-bar on Still Burnin, for example). Unfortunately I fear the well is now dry :(

Well try to b positive
I think Adams voice could inspire them
With Paul they were limited in style
With Adam they could do some BRA HAMMER AND METAL

Inspire them to do show tunes and crappy dance-pop maybe. I'll let you buy that album. I'll stick with Alter Bridge, Rival Sons, and maybe some Muse.

Holly2003 wrote:

Inspire them to do show tunes and crappy dance-pop maybe. I'll let you buy that album. I'll stick with Alter Bridge, Rival Sons, and maybe some Muse.

They should not be discussed on this forum
They are not anything to do with Queen
They are rivals
Don't advertise them
Send all money to Queen only
Then they can bring us amazing things in the future
I think Queen should create a Queen themed theme park
That would give more revenue and would be fun.
Wow a Queen City
Yes
A 100 foot tall Freddie Mercury!
The city of the fire flies!
An Amazing spectacle!

Nope, they are interesting, relevant and musically exciting, so not rivals to Queen +/- Adam Camembert

Holly2003 wrote:

Nope, they are interesting, relevant and musically exciting, so not rivals to Queen +/- Adam Camembert

Excuse moi!
This is a Queen forum not a mediocre band forum!

Mercury fur
this type of topic has been debated to death on here already

ANAGRAMER wrote:

Mercury fur
this type of topic has been debated to death on here already

So?
This is my debate on this subject with my original input.