Typhoon859 wrote:
thomasquinn 32989 wrote:
Judging an artist on the basis of a single performance, choosing said performance on the basis of what comes up first on YouTube, conducting poor/no research on the context of said performance, no comparing/contrasting, dismissing studio recordings offhand and having the gall to say that everyone else should too...
I do hope when he says "vocal student" he means he does so in his spare time after school. Because if this constitutes his "research", he'd be chucked out from the conservatory I attended within the first semester.
To be fair, he never said he did or was particularly doing research himself, hence why he probably came here to ask. He simply said he "studied" the songs/performances he mentioned. I don't see how the appropriate reaction is condescension rather than trying to educate with what you know (or at least think you know). Sorry, but someone had to come in his defense, as you're not the first one to dish out this kind of remark. It's kind of unpleasant to see or read just sitting on the sidelines.
It is also unpleasant to be told, by someone who did not do any research beforehand, that "I only evaluate a singer by his live singing and so should anybody else". I don't like being told how to do something when the person telling me doesn't know what they're talking about.
I am annoyed, not so much by the inaccuracies, but by the unjustified tone of authority assumed and the frank condescension in the original post.