matt z
All indications point to the setlist being practically identical to all the prior shows. I'm beginning to suspect that White Queen may not make the setlist tomorrow. :-/
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Jimmy Dean
[QUOTE] [b]matt z wrote:[/b]
All indications point to the setlist being practically identical to all the prior shows. I'm beginning to suspect that White Queen may not make the setlist tomorrow. :-/
[/QUOTE]
make sure your the first to let us know if something as ridiculously incredible as that happens!
All indications point to the setlist being practically identical to all the prior shows. I'm beginning to suspect that White Queen may not make the setlist tomorrow. :-/
[/QUOTE]
make sure your the first to let us know if something as ridiculously incredible as that happens!
Jimmy Dean
and not saying you're ridiculous for imagining that... more in regards to anyone involved in the production to actually consider it...
i'm pretty sure stone cold crazy, '39 and in the lap of the gods were considered to be daring songs to add to the setlist (not counting love kills) since they believe 99% of the audience only owns "the platinum collection" or a variation of that... stone cold crazy was on Classic Queen... which was probably a big seller in the early 90s.
i'm pretty sure stone cold crazy, '39 and in the lap of the gods were considered to be daring songs to add to the setlist (not counting love kills) since they believe 99% of the audience only owns "the platinum collection" or a variation of that... stone cold crazy was on Classic Queen... which was probably a big seller in the early 90s.
matt z
Yeah. I see your point.
I hope you're wrong!
I hope you're wrong!