Queen crest Queenzone

Queen forever

29 posts
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
Am I the only one that thinks queen forever should not be viewed as the 16th album. We've been told it will be compilation with only 3 new songs. So should we consider it the 16th album
Gerry is an douche
· Member since
I suppose it's up to the individual if they want to consider it the 16th Album or not. I mean "Made in Heaven" was full of Remixed tracks that we already had. So if "Queen Forever" only has 3 new tracks & some remixed versions, should we consider it an Original album? & for that matter "QGH 3" had tracks/versions that were not on any other album???
Joyful the sound
· Member since
Does it matter ?
· Member since
It should be considered like Queen Rocks. A compilation album with reworked track/s.
Don't forget my collection of demos and outtakes: http://goo.gl/uQARhn PM me if you want any [leaked] multitrack. Ya se ven los tigres en la lluvia.
· Member since
^^^^^
As always a good idea beta
Gerry is an douche
· Member since
Are we sure there are only 3 new tracks on the album? That would be a major disappointment if that is true. I'm pretty sure there will be at least 4; Love Kills, Let me in (your heart again), There must be more to life than this and either/ both Victory and State of shock.
· Member since
and maybe more...
· Member since
State of shock victory would jacksons estate ok it
Gerry is an douche
· Member since
So far, the only unheard track (in some form or other) is Victory...I really hope Greg has found something that is outstanding that Roger & Brian have now got to finish.
Joyful the sound
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]A Word In Your Ear wrote:[/b]

So far, the only unheard track (in some form or other) is Victory...I really hope Greg has found something that is outstanding that Roger & Brian have now got to finish.[/QUOTE]
Joyful the sound
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Jefffab1995 wrote:[/b]

Am I the only one that thinks queen forever should not be viewed as the 16th album. We've been told it will be compilation with only 3 new songs. So should we consider it the 16th album [/QUOTE]

Oh dear, who said WE view it as Queen's 16th album proper? I always viewed it as a compilation, because that's what they said it is going to be. Roger made it perfectly clear in an interview with a Polish magazine that a second album like "Made in Heaven" it will be not.
· Member since
Some people will and it is listed as the successor to made in heaven
Gerry is an douche
· Member since
"Listed as a successor"... I don't know what are you talking about, really.
· Member since
Ok sir
Gerry is an douche
· Member since
It seems to sit in the same basket as Made In Heaven to me. And to most more casual Queen fans who don't know the solo albums, I reckon it WILL be viewed as the 16th Queen studio album, because all the tracks will seem to be new. And the mainstream is where the album will be classified IMO.