tero! 48531 wrote:
Everyone of us is going to die sooner or later, and there's no harm in speaking about it in a neutral way.
There's also nothing to gain from speculating on who's going to die first out of three members of a band whom we love.
tero! 48531 wrote:
Everyone of us is going to die sooner or later, and there's no harm in speaking about it in a neutral way.
tomchristie22 wrote:
tero! 48531 wrote:
Everyone of us is going to die sooner or later, and there's no harm in speaking about it in a neutral way.
There's also nothing to gain from speculating on who's going to die first out of three members of a band whom we love.
tero! 48531 wrote:tomchristie22 wrote:
tero! 48531 wrote:
Everyone of us is going to die sooner or later, and there's no harm in speaking about it in a neutral way.
There's also nothing to gain from speculating on who's going to die first out of three members of a band whom we love.
Actually, there is something to gain.
What will happen to Queen+whoever if Brian or Roger dies in the next few years?
What will happen to the archive releases when the members die?
What will happen to the re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-releases when the members die?
MercurialFreddie wrote:
Imagine people from "Queen camp" [GT, GB, JSS and others] came to this forum and saw this thread...
MercurialFreddie wrote:
Tero, you talk like you really don't know how music industry [business] reacts to this... Universal would for 99 % hire some producents, mixers to remix unreleased or discarded tracks, loop some vocals from demos etc. Basically it could be the same fate which met MJ's unreleased tracks but it won't come to this as long as Bri and Rog are fit and healthy and as long as all the people from "Queen camp" and Freddie's estate are alive.
tero! 48531 wrote:
But if all the decisions about Queen were entirely in the hands of Brian, we could expect a Queen+Kerry Ellis theme album about saving the badgers...
It's not a pretty image, is it?