The King Of Rhye
He said he was going to 'bring new depth' to queenzone.........I think he meant he was going to bring us TO new depths.........
Thread
Posts in chronological order
The Real Wizard
[QUOTE] [b]The King Of Rhye wrote:[/b]
He said he was going to 'bring new depth' to queenzone.........I think he meant he was going to bring us TO new depths.........[/QUOTE]
Ding.
He said he was going to 'bring new depth' to queenzone.........I think he meant he was going to bring us TO new depths.........[/QUOTE]
Ding.
The Real Wizard
[QUOTE] [b]Stelios wrote:[/b]
There was this stupid old rumour, i dont know if anyone remembers, that Roger gave a blow job to Freddie. [/QUOTE]
I've never heard it. But thanks for perpetuating it.
Bravo to everyone here who has any sense of historical perspective. It was the early 70s, and it was hip to have the androgynous look. It's why Bowie could look like he did and be successful, and why Mercury could be gay and do what he did and be successful without anyone really wondering (or caring) if he was gay. It was only until the early 80s when he developed the Village People look that people started to clue in and react.
There was this stupid old rumour, i dont know if anyone remembers, that Roger gave a blow job to Freddie. [/QUOTE]
I've never heard it. But thanks for perpetuating it.
Bravo to everyone here who has any sense of historical perspective. It was the early 70s, and it was hip to have the androgynous look. It's why Bowie could look like he did and be successful, and why Mercury could be gay and do what he did and be successful without anyone really wondering (or caring) if he was gay. It was only until the early 80s when he developed the Village People look that people started to clue in and react.
brENsKi
i'm trying to understand (but failing) what this has to do with anything?
who cares? and why would anyone care?
it's irrelevant to anything to do with the band...it didn't change the dynamic in any way, i can't see any direct influences in any of Roger's song writing.
why does this even belong in a forum about music?
and how does this one poster get away with flagrant use of overtly negative homosexual references?
who cares? and why would anyone care?
it's irrelevant to anything to do with the band...it didn't change the dynamic in any way, i can't see any direct influences in any of Roger's song writing.
why does this even belong in a forum about music?
and how does this one poster get away with flagrant use of overtly negative homosexual references?
The Real Wizard
Some people are Neanderthals...
For most people this is just a stepping stone in their growth, but for others it's the final step.
For most people this is just a stepping stone in their growth, but for others it's the final step.
Costa86
[QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]
i'm trying to understand (but failing) what this has to do with anything?
who cares? and why would anyone care?
it's irrelevant to anything to do with the band...it didn't change the dynamic in any way, i can't see any direct influences in any of Roger's song writing.
why does this even belong in a forum about music?
and how does this one poster get away with flagrant use of overtly negative homosexual references?[/QUOTE]
It's quite evident, not that we should care or that it should matter, that goose44 is either (a) a repressed homosexual, or (b) an immature teenager, or (c) a hick-type character who still thinks it's funny to laugh at gays.
i'm trying to understand (but failing) what this has to do with anything?
who cares? and why would anyone care?
it's irrelevant to anything to do with the band...it didn't change the dynamic in any way, i can't see any direct influences in any of Roger's song writing.
why does this even belong in a forum about music?
and how does this one poster get away with flagrant use of overtly negative homosexual references?[/QUOTE]
It's quite evident, not that we should care or that it should matter, that goose44 is either (a) a repressed homosexual, or (b) an immature teenager, or (c) a hick-type character who still thinks it's funny to laugh at gays.
RafaelS
When you think you hit a new low with the colonoscopy thread, you have something like this coming out of the blue...
matt z
[QUOTE] [b]RafaelS wrote:[/b]
When you think you hit a new low with the colonoscopy thread, you have something like this coming out of the blue...[/QUOTE]
Haha. I'm sure there will be a newer low eventually. It happens.
When you think you hit a new low with the colonoscopy thread, you have something like this coming out of the blue...[/QUOTE]
Haha. I'm sure there will be a newer low eventually. It happens.
ANAGRAMER
[QUOTE] [b]goose44 wrote:[/b]
They lived together on the early years and roger, especially in the early days was feminine and looked like fruit like mr mercury. Roger. Has been accused of,going both ways as well[/QUOTE]
Bizarre....
They lived together on the early years and roger, especially in the early days was feminine and looked like fruit like mr mercury. Roger. Has been accused of,going both ways as well[/QUOTE]
Bizarre....
QUEENBRIANMAY
WHAT STUPID QUESTION, GOOSE 44 IS GAY OR A DICKHEAD FOR SURE
Rokku
With M.Bison intonation from crappy SF movie :
"OF COURSE!!!"
"OF COURSE!!!"
goose44
all the hate for no reason at all. just asked a question as there was a rumor about it years ago. thanks for the responses. my posts are dedicated to all the beautiful people in this forum, which is all of you. Thanks for coming along and making this a joyous occassion.
thomasquinn 32989
[QUOTE]
[b]Costa86 wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]
i'm trying to understand (but failing) what this has to do with anything?
who cares? and why would anyone care?
it's irrelevant to anything to do with the band...it didn't change the dynamic in any way, i can't see any direct influences in any of Roger's song writing.
why does this even belong in a forum about music?
and how does this one poster get away with flagrant use of overtly negative homosexual references?[/QUOTE]
It's quite evident, not that we should care or that it should matter, that goose44 is either (a) a repressed homosexual, or (b) an immature teenager, or (c) a hick-type character who still thinks it's funny to laugh at gays.
[/QUOTE]
Or D, a wind-up merchant who likes to deliberately provoke outrage and spoil the atmosphere. Or, and I mean that quite seriously, all of the above.
And there is always the possibility that this individual has heard something about a Roger Taylor sex tape and has decided to fill in the remaining details regarding said tape according to personal taste and preferences.
[b]Costa86 wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]
i'm trying to understand (but failing) what this has to do with anything?
who cares? and why would anyone care?
it's irrelevant to anything to do with the band...it didn't change the dynamic in any way, i can't see any direct influences in any of Roger's song writing.
why does this even belong in a forum about music?
and how does this one poster get away with flagrant use of overtly negative homosexual references?[/QUOTE]
It's quite evident, not that we should care or that it should matter, that goose44 is either (a) a repressed homosexual, or (b) an immature teenager, or (c) a hick-type character who still thinks it's funny to laugh at gays.
[/QUOTE]
Or D, a wind-up merchant who likes to deliberately provoke outrage and spoil the atmosphere. Or, and I mean that quite seriously, all of the above.
And there is always the possibility that this individual has heard something about a Roger Taylor sex tape and has decided to fill in the remaining details regarding said tape according to personal taste and preferences.
tero! 48531
[QUOTE] [b]thomasquinn 32989 wrote:[/b]
Or D, a wind-up merchant who likes to deliberately provoke outrage and spoil the atmosphere. [/QUOTE]
Is it actually spoiling the atmosphere if people are happy to jump in?
It would be easy to ignore the topic altogether, or steer the discussion on to a completely different matter, but it's obviously more entertaining to get involved.
Or D, a wind-up merchant who likes to deliberately provoke outrage and spoil the atmosphere. [/QUOTE]
Is it actually spoiling the atmosphere if people are happy to jump in?
It would be easy to ignore the topic altogether, or steer the discussion on to a completely different matter, but it's obviously more entertaining to get involved.
Saint Jiub
Ignore a topic on QZ? No way!! LOL