An apology

brENsKi 13 March 2015 10:25 · Member since June 2003

brENsKi 13 March 2015 10:26 · Member since June 2003

Panchgani wrote:Yes!!! "Collector Justice" must be fully imposed on the person who "re-leaked" Sheffield!!!

what's with you and your constant "siding with the indefensible?" - do you see this as your personal crusade or is it simply that you really are a prick of the first order?

Panchgani wrote:How is wishing a slow death acceptable on Queenzone?

well what's good enough for Freddie eh? (too soon???)

ludwigs wrote:Sit him up in front of the North-East city's most ardent Queen fan. They'll soon tire of the 'I-was-friends-with-Wayne Sleep-cause-my-corner-shop-once-told him-directions-to-the-motorway'.....in an ardent way of course!

that's a bit extreme...lol

Ctour wrote:Hello it's me Jefffabiano, Mercuryman12, Ctour.
I am here to apologize for everything I've done since September. Sincerely Jeff
(Jefffabiano , mercuryman12, Ctour)

why don't you just leave, take your alter-eGits (Jefffabiano , mercuryman12, Ctour) and form your own forum with Gerry (and all his pricknames) - Rugby_guy, queen2, Champagne Freddie and, MrMusic.
You can call it Shoutingatpigeons.com and once they've attained your level of imbicility you can invite Rocknrollover and Panchgani to join you.

H

Hangman_96 13 March 2015 17:12 · Member since July 2010

When some sophisticated imbeciles, someone like Fatty and Co., used to post their pathetic written creations on here, which sometimes consisted of downright inappropriate yet somehow appealing to most people material it was acceptable, even death threats were, but now such things seem to have gone out of fashion.

It is either some people had trouble developing their sense of humour when it was just germinating, or something abnormal has happened to QZ. Well, I mean, was I really threatening to kill him or did I really mean what I said? Like I've got nothing else to do in life other than waste my time on some idiot who took a bunch of people for a ride.

It is just an internet forum. Things aren't meant to be taken seriously here, so don't get so emotional.

S

Saint Jiub 13 March 2015 21:01 · Member since July 2001

brENsKi wrote:
Panchgani wrote:Yes!!! "Collector Justice" must be fully imposed on the person who "re-leaked" Sheffield!!!
what's with you and your constant "siding with the indefensible?" - do you see this as your personal crusade or is it simply that you really are a prick of the first order?

...

The collectors are looking for the sources of the leaks, whether it is depex (the re-leaker to Jeff), Just for You, or the person who originally leaked it to Just for You.

I am not sure why you think this vindictive witchhunt to find the original leaker is defensible.

S

Saint Jiub 13 March 2015 21:02 · Member since July 2001

S

Saint Jiub 13 March 2015 21:07 · Member since July 2001

Panchgani wrote:

Val Lurex wrote: When some sophisticated imbeciles, someone like Fatty and Co., used to post their pathetic written creations on here, which sometimes consisted of downright inappropriate yet somehow appealing to most people material it was acceptable, even death threats were, but now such things seem to have gone out of fashion.

It is either some people had trouble developing their sense of humour when it was just germinating, or something abnormal has happened to QZ. Well, I mean, was I really threatening to kill him or did I really mean what I said? Like I've got nothing else to do in life other than waste my time on some idiot who took a bunch of people for a ride.

It is just an internet forum. Things aren't meant to be taken seriously here, so don't get so emotional.

...

"I hope your death will be very painful, cunt." Was this supposed to be funny? Really?

I do not recall Fatty issuing death threats ... and you are no Fatty.

S

Saint Jiub 13 March 2015 21:19 · Member since July 2001

BETA215 wrote:
Panchgani wrote:

BETA215 wrote:

Thanks to you, we would never more enjoy of any new tape of any concert being shared between trusty users (Wizard, Pittrek, Solan, Gregsynth, me, brians wig, the man with the guitar in his face, alberbal12, etc.), or we are going to enjoy less amount of shares.

Really, you didn't thought LEAKING a NEVER BEFORE HEARD TAPE was something bad for the whole Queen community???!!!

...

Punishing the whole community for a leak, by keeping their toys in their pram, is standard operating procedure for the collector community.

The "whole" queen community??? Was the leak bad for those who downloaded Sheffield??

The leak was bad for everyone, even if you can't see it now.

...

The aftermath of the leak "was bad for everyone". Many people are enjoying Sheffield.

Many collectors are intentionally imposing this aftermath with their vindictive behavior.

B

BETA215 14 March 2015 09:18 · Member since August 2013

^

1) The funniest thing of all is that I'm not a collector. If I were, I would start NOW sharing things.

1) a. But hey! I'm not a collector.

2) I mean: yeah! We can hear Sheffield '74! But surely we wouldn't have a lot of new things from collectors thanks to that. That's why you can't see it now, or maybe never, the consequences of this happening.

S

Saint Jiub 14 March 2015 14:02 · Member since July 2001

BETA215 wrote: ^

1) The funniest thing of all is that I'm not a collector. If I were, I would start NOW sharing things.

1) a. But hey! I'm not a collector.

2) I mean: yeah! We can hear Sheffield '74! But surely we wouldn't have a lot of new things from collectors thanks to that. That's why you can't see it now, or maybe never, the consequences of this happening.

...

The leak did not cause the collectors not to share. The collectors CHOSE and made a vindictive decision to keep their toys in their pram for enforcement purposes. It is quite petty that the collectors would punish all fans for a leaked concert.

Do you remember Freddie's version of State of Shock with Michael Jackson? Monkberry leaked it as an mp3 about ten years ago, and a witchhunt to identify Monkberry ensued.

Every few years since then when something got leaked on QZ, the petty side of collecting would reemerge and a customary witchhunt would again ensue.

Unfortunately, it is too easy for many at QZ to ignore the periodic vindictiveness of some collectors in hope that sharing would eventually resume on QZ.

Anyway, a lossless version of State of Shock has yet be shared on QZ. If not for Monkberry, many Queen fans would have never heard this version with Freddie.

T

Thistle 14 March 2015 17:24 · Member since September 2009

I've had State Of Shock for around 14 years, and didn't have to trade anything special for it. That means it was easy to get, even then. So...if the board went apeshit over it 10 years ago, they were crying over nothing - it was already viral.

I can only take one of two things from your account above:

1 - your timeline is way off
2 - you're exaggerating.

H

Hangman_96 14 March 2015 19:17 · Member since July 2010

Panchgani wrote:

Panchgani wrote:

Val Lurex wrote: When some sophisticated imbeciles, someone like Fatty and Co., used to post their pathetic written creations on here, which sometimes consisted of downright inappropriate yet somehow appealing to most people material it was acceptable, even death threats were, but now such things seem to have gone out of fashion.

It is either some people had trouble developing their sense of humour when it was just germinating, or something abnormal has happened to QZ. Well, I mean, was I really threatening to kill him or did I really mean what I said? Like I've got nothing else to do in life other than waste my time on some idiot who took a bunch of people for a ride.

It is just an internet forum. Things aren't meant to be taken seriously here, so don't get so emotional.

...

"I hope your death will be very painful, cunt." Was this supposed to be funny? Really?

I do not recall Fatty issuing death threats ... and you are no Fatty.

Oh, really? Thanks God I am not.

S

Saint Jiub 14 March 2015 20:37 · Member since July 2001

Thistleboy1980 wrote: I've had State Of Shock for around 14 years, and didn't have to trade anything special for it. That means it was easy to get, even then. So...if the board went apeshit over it 10 years ago, they were crying over nothing - it was already viral.

I can only take one of two things from your account above:

1 - your timeline is way off
2 - you're exaggerating.

... My timeline was off. From this thread it seems like it was at least 13 years ago.

http://www.queenzone.com/forum/584597/who-may-upload-face-it-alone.aspx?page=2

T

The Real Wizard 14 March 2015 23:35 · Member since August 2002

Panchgani wrote:

http://www.queenzone.com/forum/584597/who-may-upload-face-it-alone.aspx?page=2

Is that link a time warp, or has your attitude not changed in a decade? In all that time all you've managed to do is remain a forum troll.

It's the same rant over and over again - complaining about people who aren't acting in a way that meets your personal litmus test for the sharing of music files. Because it's easier than actually doing something about it to make this into a better place. Congratulations on your longevity.

Posts in chronological order