This if we assume they share 25% each. We don't have any evidence they do this, do we? Queen publishing company could be 30-30-30-10 or many ways different.
freddiebluk · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]miraclesteinway wrote:[/b]
I think the main reason for the co-crediting was that it bypassed any arguments about who would be credited with what so they could focus on producing the best albums that Freddie was able to sing. Simple as that. [/QUOTE]
Oh yes you are right but I was asking about the possible artistic conseguences, if any, of this choice.
freddiebluk · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Sebastian wrote:[/b]
I've never been rich so I can't speak from first hand experience, but it seems to me that loads of rich people still argue, moan and even commit felonies because they still want more.[/QUOTE]
Absolutely correct. I would say rich people usually argue harder.
*goodco* · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Sebastian wrote:[/b]
Not really, considering it sold 2 million copies in the States (where 'Don't Try Suicide' was the B-Side) vs less than a tenth of it in Britain (where 'Dragon Attack' was the B-Side but the single didn't sell enough to be silver).[/QUOTE]
Even though I'm American, for the most part I have the UK releases 'in my head'. Note to self: must check discography more often before posting. So Freddie made some off of AOBTD. And John perhaps assisted with the writing of DAttack and 'Suicide', so it all kind of worked out?
Sebastian · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]*goodco* wrote:[/b]
So Freddie made some off of AOBTD.[/QUOTE]
Not just some off, but maybe even more than he made off 'Bo Rhap,' just for writing that silly 'Suicide' thing.
luthorn · Member since
I like how in the recording studio everything, down to cables, was labeled with the respective owner's name. One would think Queen members were fathered by a Scottish leprechaun