Queen crest Queenzone

Playing across the chord vs. playing scales

20 posts Page 2 of 2
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]

But on a side note - why is it considered funny to frown upon intellectuals who provide picture perfect answers to difficult questions?

I guess it's the same reason why more people watch Honey Boo Boo than Cosmos.
[/QUOTE]

"Somehow it's O.K. for people to chuckle about not being good at math. Yet if I said, 'I never learned to read,' they'd say I was an illiterate dolt."
Neil deGrasse Tyson

Not that people should be judged for not knowing music theory, but this thread is a very good example of how normal it is for people to reject pretty much everything that's slightly intellectually challenging and just joke about it.
We got the Cosmos rockin'! We got the Cosmos rockin'! We got the Universe rockin'! We got the Cosmos rockin'! We got the Cosmos rockin' to the mighty power of rock'n'roll!
· Member since
It's too bad that this anti-intellectual attitude has taken root so deeply in society, I agree. We've been seeing an 'emancipation if stupidity' over the past decades, where lack of knowledge on a subject has become ever less of a hindrance for voicing an opinion. Scientists are dismissed offhand, and conspiracy theorists with political/ideological agendas are taken at face value. Being ignorant and unwilling to learn is considered a virtue by an ever-increasing section of the population, largely the same people who get excited by politicians like Donald Trump and like-minded individuals in other countries (drunken stockmarket thief Nigel Farage, thinly-veiled neo-nazi Geert Wilders, unveiled neo-nazi Viktor Orban, second-rate dictator Vladimir Putin, etc. I didn't name these people randomly - people who like one generally also like the others). That's a deeply worrying development that threatens the very basis of parliamentary democracy, because if voters don't care about facts and refuse to inform themselves properly, it WILL (not *might*, it WILL) degenerate into mob rule.

However, I don't think we need to get too excited over one documented troll (una999) throwing a slur and one other poster jumping on the band-wagon. The way I see it, we have two "my brain hurts!"-style complaints and at least half a dozen people who did like what they read. If those were the same proportions as with the democratic problem I sketched above, we'd be fine.
Not Plutus but Apollo rules Parnassus
· Member since
Such drama ...

What slur did una999 throw?
Socialism: There's one for you, nineteen for me Should five per cent appear too small Be thankful I don't take it all
· Member since
Ok, even that is too much credit. "One documented troll (una999) who heckled" would be a better phrasing.
Not Plutus but Apollo rules Parnassus
· Member since
Gawd help 'us.
Master Marathon Runner