Nice tune although I'm not the biggest fan of Kerry's voice on anything approaching a rock song.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNRfx_0-VwI
sgs8789
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Oscar J
Not bad. A bit bland, but most of the stuff they've done together is IMO.
mr mason
More crap from the 'Doctor'!
Viper
It's not bad! Has a good vibe and a nice guitar tone!
Ivo-1976
I like it.
andyb1968
Might have been good with a proper rock voice, Brian treading water again with the solo !
mr mason
I dont know why he wastes his time producing this shit,over and over again,why cant he retire with a modicum of dignity,instead of constantly tarnishing his,and 'Queen's legacy?
k-m
I agree. The woman has a terrible voice for pop-rock and all these recordings sound so substandard it hurts. Mediocre, hookless pop music for everybody and nobody at the same time. Sorry Brian, but this is just awful.
The Real Wizard
[QUOTE] [b]mr mason wrote:[/b]
I dont know why he wastes his time producing this shit,over and over again,why cant he retire with a modicum of dignity,instead of constantly tarnishing his,and 'Queen's legacy?[/QUOTE]
I'm all in favour of people expressing things as they please, but the idea of "tarnishing a legacy" is just not based in reality.
Tarnishing a legacy means you are deleting Queen records from history.
Even after Gary Glitter diddled kids and was at the bottom of the prison totem pole, Rock And Roll Part 2 still exists and kicks ass, and that will be his musical legacy.
And likewise Brian May will always be a guitarist who created wonderful music in Queen, no matter what he does from here onward.
I dont know why he wastes his time producing this shit,over and over again,why cant he retire with a modicum of dignity,instead of constantly tarnishing his,and 'Queen's legacy?[/QUOTE]
I'm all in favour of people expressing things as they please, but the idea of "tarnishing a legacy" is just not based in reality.
Tarnishing a legacy means you are deleting Queen records from history.
Even after Gary Glitter diddled kids and was at the bottom of the prison totem pole, Rock And Roll Part 2 still exists and kicks ass, and that will be his musical legacy.
And likewise Brian May will always be a guitarist who created wonderful music in Queen, no matter what he does from here onward.
mr mason
Hes tarnishing 'Queen's legacy by keep supporting artists with sub-standard voices,murdering 'Queen' classics,and releasing sub-standard songs,and expecting us to like it,because he was once the guitarist in the greatest band in history!The music of 'Queen' brought us all together,not this crap.Thanks!
k-m
[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]mr mason wrote:[/b]
I dont know why he wastes his time producing this shit,over and over again,why cant he retire with a modicum of dignity,instead of constantly tarnishing his,and 'Queen's legacy?[/QUOTE]
I'm all in favour of people expressing things as they please, but the idea of "tarnishing a legacy" is just not based in reality.
Tarnishing a legacy means you are deleting Queen records from history.
Even after Gary Glitter diddled kids and was at the bottom of the prison totem pole, Rock And Roll Part 2 still exists and kicks ass, and that will be his musical legacy.
And likewise Brian May will always be a guitarist who created wonderful music in Queen, no matter what he does from here onward.
[/QUOTE]
Completely disagree about the Glitter comparison. Legacy exists first and foremost in people's minds and in my mind Glitter has none of it left. Couldn't give a shit about this peado's music since his crimes were revealed. Legacy is also strongly related to reputation and the more stuff like this Brian puts out there, the more it affects his overall picture in people's minds. Thank God Queen never got embroiled in anything like the stuff you brought up, because I think you'd see their shares plummet real quick.
[QUOTE] [b]mr mason wrote:[/b]
I dont know why he wastes his time producing this shit,over and over again,why cant he retire with a modicum of dignity,instead of constantly tarnishing his,and 'Queen's legacy?[/QUOTE]
I'm all in favour of people expressing things as they please, but the idea of "tarnishing a legacy" is just not based in reality.
Tarnishing a legacy means you are deleting Queen records from history.
Even after Gary Glitter diddled kids and was at the bottom of the prison totem pole, Rock And Roll Part 2 still exists and kicks ass, and that will be his musical legacy.
And likewise Brian May will always be a guitarist who created wonderful music in Queen, no matter what he does from here onward.
[/QUOTE]
Completely disagree about the Glitter comparison. Legacy exists first and foremost in people's minds and in my mind Glitter has none of it left. Couldn't give a shit about this peado's music since his crimes were revealed. Legacy is also strongly related to reputation and the more stuff like this Brian puts out there, the more it affects his overall picture in people's minds. Thank God Queen never got embroiled in anything like the stuff you brought up, because I think you'd see their shares plummet real quick.
john bodega
It's crap. Very crap. Sounds exactly like the Kissing You thing they only just released.
I'd listen to these songs if Brian was doing them on his own just for the joy of hearing him still working, but her voice makes me ill. I skip to the solos every time.
I'd listen to these songs if Brian was doing them on his own just for the joy of hearing him still working, but her voice makes me ill. I skip to the solos every time.
Bad Seed
Appallingly bad!
And someone MUST tell Kerry to stop pronouncing the letter S, 'Shh'!
And someone MUST tell Kerry to stop pronouncing the letter S, 'Shh'!
tommycharles
[QUOTE] [b]Zebonka12 wrote:[/b]
It's crap. Very crap. Sounds exactly like the Kissing You thing they only just released.
I'd listen to these songs if Brian was doing them on his own just for the joy of hearing him still working, but her voice makes me ill. I skip to the solos every time.[/QUOTE]
I don't mind her voice the way some here seem to, but I totally agree that this is too similar to The Kissing Me Song.
It's crap. Very crap. Sounds exactly like the Kissing You thing they only just released.
I'd listen to these songs if Brian was doing them on his own just for the joy of hearing him still working, but her voice makes me ill. I skip to the solos every time.[/QUOTE]
I don't mind her voice the way some here seem to, but I totally agree that this is too similar to The Kissing Me Song.
Vocal harmony
[QUOTE] [b]mr mason wrote:[/b]
I dont know why he wastes his time producing this shit,over and over again,why cant he retire with a modicum of dignity,instead of constantly tarnishing his,and 'Queen's legacy?[/QUOTE]
How can a song that isn't released under the Queen name tarnish the Queen legacy.
And as Mr Wizard says you can't tarnish what exists For all to hear in it's original form.
I dont know why he wastes his time producing this shit,over and over again,why cant he retire with a modicum of dignity,instead of constantly tarnishing his,and 'Queen's legacy?[/QUOTE]
How can a song that isn't released under the Queen name tarnish the Queen legacy.
And as Mr Wizard says you can't tarnish what exists For all to hear in it's original form.