it really looks like London, Wembley Arena, there is no such thing as Paris 1985 ;)
they played in Paris 1984, not 1985
Penetration_Guru · Member since
In a similar vein, I've been trying to upgrade the quality of the artwork on my digital files. There are plenty of sites where hi-res scans have been uploaded, and I've made full use of them, but some of my Queen stuff is a bit...niche for them (ie I don't need a GH3 scan).
So, I did some research about how best to achieve my aims, and have as a result experimented. If the following is of use to anyone, help yourselves, and if anyone has any better ideas / suggestions, I'd love to hear them too.
Penetration_Guru · Member since
First - a photo of the inner sleeve of Fun In Space, cropped to make an imaginary sleeve.
I think if I reshot this outside in daylight, I could get a better zoom and therefore more clarity, but I think it's usable...
Penetration_Guru · Member since
I tried a photo of the 12", but wasn't happy with the colours, so this is a 600dpi scan of the 7", cleaned up a little - there's some obvious signs of a dusty scanner, but again, it's better than what I had previously.
Penetration_Guru · Member since
Now it gets subjective - which of the next three do we prefer?
First, the image I was previously using - looks good on the screen, but clearly shows itself as scanned.
Penetration_Guru · Member since
Next, a photo of the 12" vinyl sleeve - I quite like the way the colours have come out, even though it's sort of washed out in a way that makes it inaccurate. Maybe it's a lack of daylight again.
Penetration_Guru · Member since
Finally, the same sleeve, but scanned at 600dpi (four times - one for each corner), stitched together then colour corrected.
Close up I can see the joins (some blurring and light variation as a result of the sleeve not being parallel to the scanner bed), but once reduced to 3000 x 3000 it works pretty well.
Penetration_Guru · Member since
Apologies if this represents a thread hijack
Chief Mouse · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]Penetration_Guru wrote: [/b] Finally, the same sleeve, but scanned at 600dpi (four times - one for each corner), stitched together then colour corrected.
Close up I can see the joins (some blurring and light variation as a result of the sleeve not being parallel to the scanner bed), but once reduced to 3000 x 3000 it works pretty well.[/QUOTE]