Recorded Live in London, Wembley Stadium, Summer 1985
They really streched their Set List at Live Aid :)
and they`ve played AKOM...
musicland munich
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Krypto_98
Im also 100% sure Hammer To Fall was played after Bohemian Rhapsody
jacksonmerc
I bought one years ago called "tokyo 85" with a kind of magic as a track
DepeX
[QUOTE]
[b]Krypto_98 wrote: [/b] Im also 100% sure Hammer To Fall was played after Bohemian Rhapsody[/QUOTE]
Indeed. The setlist in this bootleg is mixed up.
[b]Krypto_98 wrote: [/b] Im also 100% sure Hammer To Fall was played after Bohemian Rhapsody[/QUOTE]
Indeed. The setlist in this bootleg is mixed up.
PiotreQ
Wow. Another rare recording! For rare trades only I believe.
Ghostwithasmile is BACK!
WellI agree ... But..... This is a rerelease of one of the first Queen cd bootlegs ever. A release from 1991/1992 remember those were the days before the internet ! It was quite hard to determine a previous queen concert date.
Here some details if the original release.
[url=http://queenonstage.com/mywebpage/adayatthestadium.htm]http://queenonstage.com/mywebpage/adayatthestadium.htm[/url]
Here some details if the original release.
[url=http://queenonstage.com/mywebpage/adayatthestadium.htm]http://queenonstage.com/mywebpage/adayatthestadium.htm[/url]
musicland munich
[QUOTE] [b]Ghostwithasmile is BACK! wrote:[/b]
WellI agree ... But..... This is a rerelease of one of the first Queen cd bootlegs ever. A release from 1991/1992 remember those were the days before the internet ! It was quite hard to determine a previous queen concert date.
Here some details if the original release.
[url=http://queenonstage.com/mywebpage/adayatthestadium.htm]http://queenonstage.com/mywebpage/adayatthestadium.htm[/url][/QUOTE]
Thanks for the Link.
True what you say about the original 92`release. But this one is a Re-release from 2001. If people decide to make a living out of Bootlegs, then they should put more efforts in their projects imo.
WellI agree ... But..... This is a rerelease of one of the first Queen cd bootlegs ever. A release from 1991/1992 remember those were the days before the internet ! It was quite hard to determine a previous queen concert date.
Here some details if the original release.
[url=http://queenonstage.com/mywebpage/adayatthestadium.htm]http://queenonstage.com/mywebpage/adayatthestadium.htm[/url][/QUOTE]
Thanks for the Link.
True what you say about the original 92`release. But this one is a Re-release from 2001. If people decide to make a living out of Bootlegs, then they should put more efforts in their projects imo.
The Real Wizard
It's not stupidity. It's taking a well known recording, labelling it as another date, and hoping to get sales from unsuspecting customers hoping they're getting something new. They get home, put the record or CD on, and they're disappointed.
It's a worn out trick that goes back to the 70s.
It's a worn out trick that goes back to the 70s.
mooghead
Queen Bootleggers... trying to exploit Queen fans... and they will... who's stupid?
The Real Wizard
But they're not Queen bootleggers - they're bootleggers. These companies would press anything by anyone to make a buck.
musicland munich
No need to worry folks.I`ve noticed that flaw before I click "Buy"
It was on sale on Ebay by a German Seller, for the suspicious low price of Five bucks. No one bought it ! The auction ends without a bid.
As a typical side note, this bootleg is from an Italian Company. Italy refused to sign EU-Contracts about copyright issues for a long time. Not sure about the recent status of Italy about that matter.
It was on sale on Ebay by a German Seller, for the suspicious low price of Five bucks. No one bought it ! The auction ends without a bid.
As a typical side note, this bootleg is from an Italian Company. Italy refused to sign EU-Contracts about copyright issues for a long time. Not sure about the recent status of Italy about that matter.
brians wig
[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]
It's not stupidity. It's taking a well known recording, labelling it as another date, and hoping to get sales from unsuspecting customers hoping they're getting something new. They get home, put the record or CD on, and they're disappointed.
It's a worn out trick that goes back to the 70s.
[/QUOTE]
Yep. I can think of a few early 70's Queen tapes that are faked from other concerts with in-between song banter cut out and purposely degraded to hide anything that "sticks out" which could be matched to another gig.
It's only a few years ago I found a bootleg CD at a record fair from a non-existant concert in Germany in 1974 that was 2 hours long....
How I laughed before putting it back.
It's not stupidity. It's taking a well known recording, labelling it as another date, and hoping to get sales from unsuspecting customers hoping they're getting something new. They get home, put the record or CD on, and they're disappointed.
It's a worn out trick that goes back to the 70s.
[/QUOTE]
Yep. I can think of a few early 70's Queen tapes that are faked from other concerts with in-between song banter cut out and purposely degraded to hide anything that "sticks out" which could be matched to another gig.
It's only a few years ago I found a bootleg CD at a record fair from a non-existant concert in Germany in 1974 that was 2 hours long....
How I laughed before putting it back.
Nitroboy
[QUOTE]
[b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] But they're not Queen bootleggers - they're bootleggers. These companies would press anything by anyone to make a buck. [/QUOTE]
And sadly they're still around after decades.
[b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] But they're not Queen bootleggers - they're bootleggers. These companies would press anything by anyone to make a buck. [/QUOTE]
And sadly they're still around after decades.
The Real Wizard
[QUOTE] [b]Nitroboy wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] But they're not Queen bootleggers - they're bootleggers. These companies would press anything by anyone to make a buck. [/QUOTE]
And sadly they're still around after decades.[/QUOTE]
Check your PMs :)
[QUOTE]
[b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] But they're not Queen bootleggers - they're bootleggers. These companies would press anything by anyone to make a buck. [/QUOTE]
And sadly they're still around after decades.[/QUOTE]
Check your PMs :)
dysan
It's also fair to say that giving bootlegs an inaccurate date was an old trick if the law did catch up with them - they simply say Queen never did that date. Same with the spate of early 90s bootlegs entitled 'live in Europe' - same vague get out clause when some laws or other changed.