[QUOTE] [b]brians wig wrote:[/b]
Or you could just tell us your results Mark....
The pure audio "should" be better, but...?[/QUOTE]
To cut a long story short.
I prefer the DVD-A over the Blu-ray Pure Audio disc.
There is a very factual and honest review here (the first one)
[url=https://www.amazon.co.uk/Night-At-Opera-Queen/dp/B00BSDTGAI]https://www.amazon.co.uk/Night-At-Opera-Queen/dp/B00BSDTGAI[/url]
Also another thread here that might be of interest:
http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1344784/queen-dvd-audio-releases.aspx
DVD-A has an insane dynamic range, no wonder you like it. Of course, you need powerful equipment too fully enjoy it.
I believe they reduced dynamic range on Blu-ray to make it more compatible with 99% of the surround systems, which are not audiophile at all.
But don't think it's necessarily a downgrade. Returning to the original album dynamic range (of the mix), and still keeping the benefits of higher resolution, could be a good thing for the musical perception itself. As impressive as it is, DVD-A has some distracting "Industrial Light & Magic" moments.
I prefer the stereo 24/96 LPCM containing an almost flat transfer of the 1/4 inch original mix master.
Well, did you not all hear something good? :-D
[QUOTE] [b]aristide1 wrote:[/b]
I prefer the stereo 24/96 LPCM containing an almost flat transfer of the 1/4 inch original mix master.[/QUOTE]
The stereo 24/96 LPCM on the DVD-A is way too loud for my liking, see this thread:
[url=http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1344784/dvd-audio-question.aspx?page=1]http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1344784/dvd-audio-question.aspx?page=1[/url]
Yes, not such a flat transfer. Only a flat sound.
Check your mail.
Yes, in no way a flat transfer.
Reply sent.
