[QUOTE] [b]master marathon runner wrote:[/b]
Son & daughter.[/QUOTE]
I agree. That's my pick too.
Rubbersuit
Thread
Posts in chronological order
mooghead
It's amazing that my (admittedly crap) attempt at humour in the opening post has resulted in a 3 page discussion :-)
mike hunt
The average Rock fan don't really know how heavy Queen were at times, That's why I like this thread. I like playing Great King Rat to people who only know the hits. That song reminds me of Maiden before Maiden exsited, Orge Battle with those halford style screams before Priest were doing it.
noorie
[QUOTE] [b]mooghead wrote:[/b]
I got my scales out and surprisingly the heaviest Queen song is Lily of the Valley weighing in at a hefty 7.3 metric tonnes![/QUOTE]
Actually Moog, Nevermore comes in slightly heavier at 7.4! Check for yourself.
(I have a ton of time to waste today, and nothing better to do.)
I got my scales out and surprisingly the heaviest Queen song is Lily of the Valley weighing in at a hefty 7.3 metric tonnes![/QUOTE]
Actually Moog, Nevermore comes in slightly heavier at 7.4! Check for yourself.
(I have a ton of time to waste today, and nothing better to do.)
Holly2003
Brighton Rock, Son & Daughter, Father to Son, It's Late, Soul Brother, See What A Fool I've Been all very heavy. Prob Brighton Rock shades it for me.
motorhead
Dead On Time is the heaviest IMO
waunakonor
dysan wrote: It's just a bit dreary and obvious. I know a few people have said it, but Adam Lambert doing it live is amazing and theatrical which I think the Queen version isn't. Perhaps mid 80s production values didn't do justice to the rock ballad format?
waunakonor
For single heaviest song I'd have to go with Father to Son. That solo section just crushes.
[QUOTE] [b]dysan wrote:[/b]
Earth probably weighs a lot.[/QUOTE]
Great band, and they can be really heavy.
[QUOTE] [b]mike hunt wrote:[/b]
Being fan of Iron Maiden growing up I can't stand anything after 1988.[/QUOTE]
Every Maiden album released since 2000 is better than most of their albums in the '80s. Fight me.
Also while '80s Queen does have a lot of stuff to like as a whole it's just so much worse than their '70s output. '80s Queen doesn't "suck" necessarily but they're not all that great overall. Innuendo and Made in Heaven, on the other hand, are great.
[QUOTE] [b]mooghead wrote:[/b]
It's amazing that my (admittedly crap) attempt at humour in the opening post has resulted in a 3 page discussion :-)[/QUOTE]
Not that surprising. There's much else to talk about these days.
[QUOTE] [b]dysan wrote:[/b]
Earth probably weighs a lot.[/QUOTE]
Great band, and they can be really heavy.
[QUOTE] [b]mike hunt wrote:[/b]
Being fan of Iron Maiden growing up I can't stand anything after 1988.[/QUOTE]
Every Maiden album released since 2000 is better than most of their albums in the '80s. Fight me.
Also while '80s Queen does have a lot of stuff to like as a whole it's just so much worse than their '70s output. '80s Queen doesn't "suck" necessarily but they're not all that great overall. Innuendo and Made in Heaven, on the other hand, are great.
[QUOTE] [b]mooghead wrote:[/b]
It's amazing that my (admittedly crap) attempt at humour in the opening post has resulted in a 3 page discussion :-)[/QUOTE]
Not that surprising. There's much else to talk about these days.
mike hunt
We have to disagree on Maiden, i tried liking the new Stuff 2000 to the new album, but it's not happening for me. All their new stuff sounds the same, those long boring intros. Lacks energy as well. Then put on Killers, heavy and raw with that youthful energy. I do agree on Queen, I like Innuendo and Made In Heaven better than their 80's stuff.