Adam is so goo

rockchic65 wrote:

Iron Butterfly wrote:


Of course you think what I do is childish. But once again you have nothing to say about what SweetCaroline did and does, but it's obvious you take her side.
What SweetCaroline does is beyond childish. She hates me, her own words on this very board. What she does is shit stir and feed it to others.
I know you aren't too happy with me when I state my views that AL rides on coattails. Ever since you and I disagreed about that, you have changed. You point out what I do, and thanks for not ever becoming personal with me, and I respect and thank you for that, but why is that almost every AL and Glambert come here taking SweetCaroline's side? Then pointing fingers at me? Only AngelR had the guts to say something about what SweetCaroline does. The rest of a certain clique here, yourself to a degree, snifflese, young music fan, take her side and make it look like she's innocent and is never wrong. Sorry thsts bullshit.

SweetCaroline is a grandmother, old enough to know better, but she does. I bet she's thrilled because some people feed her ego by defending her You are one of them lately. You cant even say what SweetCaroline said above wasn't a good idea. I'm not surprised, Glamberts stick together and all that.

There are three people here who don't don't take SweetCaroline's shit lying down. I'm one of them. I doubt you would want the blame placed on you for everything and anything from elsewhere , would you? No, i don't think so. SweetCaroline has been blaming me for years, why isn't that childish to you?

Nothing to do with taking sides but take a look in the Velvet thread SC started in the personal section, as told to by someone since it was Adam's solo stuff and not QAL related. Take a look at Saint Juib's comment about the tweet of Adam's she posted and your reply to him and then the next replies you made, she can't even post in the right section about an artist she clearly loves without someone having a go at her, there was nothing wrong with either of the links she posted so no reason to pick at her for it.

Allegedly, a forum is typically for discussion, but SC generally only spams links and tweets without any comment or context.

I replied to a banal one line tweet that she spammed.

www.queenzone.com/forums/1582131/adam-lambert-s-velvet-album.aspx

Saint Jiub wrote:

Allegedly, a forum is typically for discussion, but SC generally only spams links and tweets without any comment or context.

I replied to a banal one line tweet that she spammed.

www.queenzone.com/forums/1582131/adam-lambert-s-velvet-album.aspx

I agree SC posts links with no explanation of what they are about including tweets during the tour but most adults just ignore them if not interested, they don't exactly take up much room on the forum unlike the endless childish rants that go on and on interminably and make it impossible to actually find any relevant comments to actually reply to, that was the point I was making.

rockchic65 wrote:

Saint Jiub wrote:

Allegedly, a forum is typically for discussion, but SC generally only spams links and tweets without any comment or context.

I replied to a banal one line tweet that she spammed.

www.queenzone.com/forums/1582131/adam-lambert-s-velvet-album.aspx

I agree SC posts links with no explanation of what they are about including tweets during the tour but most adults just ignore them if not interested, they don't exactly take up much room on the forum unlike the endless childish rants that go on and on interminably and make it impossible to actually find any relevant comments to actually reply to, that was the point I was making.

Oh, so she doesn't take up too much now is the latest excuse to give for her spamming. Haha...she posts links, tweets, sometimes right after the other, even in the Trump and Putin, sorry, conspiracies thread she has going on. In some cases, posts after post right after the other with no thought of her own to give, just cut and paste jobs that suits her agenda. Go look if you don't believe me.

What is it with some Glamberts and AL fans obsession with my posts lately? At least I can think for myself. SweetCaroline cannot, unless Q+AL is magical, magnificent and spectacular, and AL is gorgeous, sexy, etc.

Iron Butterfly wrote:


Oh, so she doesn't take up too much now is the latest excuse to give for her spamming. Haha...she posts links, tweets, sometimes right after the other, even in the Trump and Putin, sorry, conspiracies thread she has going on. In some cases, posts after post right after the other with no thought of her own to give, just cut and paste jobs that suits her agenda. Go look if you don't believe me.

What is it with some Glamberts and AL fans obsession with my posts lately? At least I can think for myself. SweetCaroline cannot, unless Q+AL is magical, magnificent and spectacular, and AL is gorgeous, sexy, etc.

If you read back over all the pages on these threads there's a common theme, virtually every comment you make is about people, what they said, what they did, what they should and shouldn't do, where they should post, who said what endlesss years ago, bumping threads to prove a point etc etc, sorry but I don't call that thinking for oneself I call it regurgitating arguments and never letting anything go so in the scheme of things if SC or anyone posts 6 or 7 one line links to a tweet one after the other I really don't see the problem. Am I interested in them, No, do they bother me, No, and why they would bother anyone really is baffling to me, they're innocuous links that no one is compelled to even click on and are easy to ignore for most of us, far easier than the endless arguments that have become the main part of every single thread.

rockchic65 wrote:

Iron Butterfly wrote:


Oh, so she doesn't take up too much now is the latest excuse to give for her spamming. Haha...she posts links, tweets, sometimes right after the other, even in the Trump and Putin, sorry, conspiracies thread she has going on. In some cases, posts after post right after the other with no thought of her own to give, just cut and paste jobs that suits her agenda. Go look if you don't believe me.

What is it with some Glamberts and AL fans obsession with my posts lately? At least I can think for myself. SweetCaroline cannot, unless Q+AL is magical, magnificent and spectacular, and AL is gorgeous, sexy, etc.

If you read back over all the pages on these threads there's a common theme, virtually every comment you make is about people, what they said, what they did, what they should and shouldn't do, where they should post, who said what endlesss years ago, bumping threads to prove a point etc etc, sorry but I don't call that thinking for oneself I call it regurgitating arguments and never letting anything go so in the scheme of things if SC or anyone posts 6 or 7 one line links to a tweet one after the other I really don't see the problem. Am I interested in them, No, do they bother me, No, and why they would bother anyone really is baffling to me, they're innocuous links that no one is compelled to even click on and are easy to ignore for most of us, far easier than the endless arguments that have become the main part of every single thread.

You say you don't take sides, but it becomes more and more which side you are on.
You have one problem with anything SweetCaroline does, and you point your fingers at me.
How the fk would you feel rockchic, if SweetCaroline said about you, what she does about me? I'm sure you wouldn't be happy. Sweet has blamed for every fkn ban she's ever had from QOL, to bans of other Glamberts and blaming me for crashing QOL, is the latest.
The worst thing she has ever done is to have a go at me for what she the about my mental health as my father was dying...that alone made me lose any respect I ever had for SweetCaroline.
I suppose what she said in the last example that's OK with you too, is it, since you think what she does isn't bad. For real, rockchic, I've said many things to and about SweetCaroline but at least I've never sank that low, no matter how you or anyone else thinks I'm rotten to the core.
Good to know what side you are really on. Sorry, it's obvious as hell.

Iron Butterfly wrote:

rockchic65 wrote:

Iron Butterfly wrote:


Oh, so she doesn't take up too much now is the latest excuse to give for her spamming. Haha...she posts links, tweets, sometimes right after the other, even in the Trump and Putin, sorry, conspiracies thread she has going on. In some cases, posts after post right after the other with no thought of her own to give, just cut and paste jobs that suits her agenda. Go look if you don't believe me.

What is it with some Glamberts and AL fans obsession with my posts lately? At least I can think for myself. SweetCaroline cannot, unless Q+AL is magical, magnificent and spectacular, and AL is gorgeous, sexy, etc.

If you read back over all the pages on these threads there's a common theme, virtually every comment you make is about people, what they said, what they did, what they should and shouldn't do, where they should post, who said what endlesss years ago, bumping threads to prove a point etc etc, sorry but I don't call that thinking for oneself I call it regurgitating arguments and never letting anything go so in the scheme of things if SC or anyone posts 6 or 7 one line links to a tweet one after the other I really don't see the problem. Am I interested in them, No, do they bother me, No, and why they would bother anyone really is baffling to me, they're innocuous links that no one is compelled to even click on and are easy to ignore for most of us, far easier than the endless arguments that have become the main part of every single thread.

You say you don't take sides, but it becomes more and more which side you are on.
You have one problem with anything SweetCaroline does, and you point your fingers at me.
How the fk would you feel rockchic, if SweetCaroline said about you, what she does about me? I'm sure you wouldn't be happy. Sweet has blamed for every fkn ban she's ever had from QOL, to bans of other Glamberts and blaming me for crashing QOL, is the latest.
The worst thing she has ever done is to have a go at me for what she the about my mental health as my father was dying. I suppose that's OK with you too, is it.
Good to know.

I'm not on any side except the side of being able to post an opinion or link without the third degree every time and that goes for anyone not just SC.

I'm not getting into personal stuff that anyone posts or their arguments they just aren't my thing I'd much rather debate actual topics.

rockchic65 wrote:

Iron Butterfly wrote:

rockchic65 wrote:

Iron Butterfly wrote:


Oh, so she doesn't take up too much now is the latest excuse to give for her spamming. Haha...she posts links, tweets, sometimes right after the other, even in the Trump and Putin, sorry, conspiracies thread she has going on. In some cases, posts after post right after the other with no thought of her own to give, just cut and paste jobs that suits her agenda. Go look if you don't believe me.

What is it with some Glamberts and AL fans obsession with my posts lately? At least I can think for myself. SweetCaroline cannot, unless Q+AL is magical, magnificent and spectacular, and AL is gorgeous, sexy, etc.

If you read back over all the pages on these threads there's a common theme, virtually every comment you make is about people, what they said, what they did, what they should and shouldn't do, where they should post, who said what endlesss years ago, bumping threads to prove a point etc etc, sorry but I don't call that thinking for oneself I call it regurgitating arguments and never letting anything go so in the scheme of things if SC or anyone posts 6 or 7 one line links to a tweet one after the other I really don't see the problem. Am I interested in them, No, do they bother me, No, and why they would bother anyone really is baffling to me, they're innocuous links that no one is compelled to even click on and are easy to ignore for most of us, far easier than the endless arguments that have become the main part of every single thread.

You say you don't take sides, but it becomes more and more which side you are on.
You have one problem with anything SweetCaroline does, and you point your fingers at me.
How the fk would you feel rockchic, if SweetCaroline said about you, what she does about me? I'm sure you wouldn't be happy. Sweet has blamed for every fkn ban she's ever had from QOL, to bans of other Glamberts and blaming me for crashing QOL, is the latest.
The worst thing she has ever done is to have a go at me for what she the about my mental health as my father was dying. I suppose that's OK with you too, is it.
Good to know.

I'm not on any side except the side of being able to post an opinion or link without the third degree every time and that goes for anyone not just SC.

I'm not getting into personal stuff that anyone posts or their arguments they just aren't my thing I'd much rather debate actual topics.

SweetCaroline starts threads weeks in advance of a Q+AL tour starting. It seems she wants and needs to be the first to start any thread.
I'm sure if I said something here about AL messing up WWRY, I'd be jumped on by the two main Glamberts here. Hell, I gave some of my views about the Fire Fight concert thread on QOL and SweetCaroline ran here to twist things and bitch about me here...even though I didn't give any of those options here to begin with. So, where we're you then, rockchic?
I get I'm a pain in the ass. I can even be a bitch. But I'm not what some people here think I am and want you to believe about me. I'm sorry, it looks like you have swallowed the bullshit. Can you admit that SweetCaroline has gone to far at times? Without you saying what she does isn't that bad?

( Edited and added more to my above post, I got called away for a bit, then I was posting about two songs that I pointed out to someone else )