[QUOTE] [b]PrimeJiveUSA wrote:[/b]
So...if the concerts only sold 40% of tickets the band makes the same as they would if they had sold 100%.? It's the promoter that stands to win or lose?
[/QUOTE]
Usually a band of Queens size get either a percentage of ticket sales but with a guaranteed hefty minimum, or a set fee plus bonuses depending on how many tickets are sold. I imagine queens guarantee was around 500,000 per show, possibly more. The band are responsible for the cost of the crew and all the touring expenses which for a tour that size probably run to six figures per day so a day off is expensive. Healthy profit in it though. Im sure Brian and Roger are a few million better off each now than they were.
Looking at the figures I would guess the promoters made a profit everywhere except Vegas, Kansas and uncasville. The uncasville show is particularly weird, unless Queen did the show for a smaller fee I don't see how the promoter makes money there. Possibly Queens fee was for the whole tour but playing a less than 7000 seat venue seems odd.
The only way to view the tour as a failure financially is to look at how much Coldplay are earning and see how well they are doing in comparison but there is no way the band haven't come out of this very well financially, and I'm sure Adam Lambert just had his biggest ever pay day too.
I am of course assuming the spreadsheet is accurate and not just random figures plucked from someone's eyebrow.
ggo1