^ Just how pointless it is remains to be seen. There is a big difference between trading and hoarding though, and some people seem unable to grasp that. If the jealous bitch comment is aimed at me, you fired your arrow in the wrong direction I'm afraid. I have no problem with traders, would there really be any trading sites around if there was no longer a supply and demand? I'm not accusing the tapers of any wrong doing either, of course they can do as they please with their recordings. Traded concerts eventually come out in the wash, so it's to the advantage of everyone in the end, and actually helps to eliminate hoarding. Once you trade something even once, it is effectively in the public domain.
people on streets · Member since
Not aimed at anyone in particular. I couldn't care less.
Just listened to the recording. What a joke. Haha. Must've been the worst audience tape I've ever heard.
Only in the Queencommunity.... hahaha
MackMantilla · Member since
Very nice to have a 'new' Crazy Tour recording emerged.
Thanks a lot to everyone involved :-)
Nitroboy · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]people on streets wrote:[/b]
Not aimed at anyone in particular. I couldn't care less.
Just listened to the recording. What a joke. Haha. Must've been the worst audience tape I've ever heard.
Only in the Queencommunity.... hahaha[/QUOTE]
Have you heard the tale of Glasgow '74?
The Real Wizard · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Barry Durex wrote:[/b]
^ Almost as funny as your PM's.[/QUOTE]
We haven't PM'd in quite some time.
Thank you for clarifying for everyone that it's you who is going undercover under other user names.
Barry Durex · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Barry Durex wrote:[/b]
^ Almost as funny as your PM's.[/QUOTE]
We haven't PM'd in quite some time.
Thank you for clarifying for everyone that it's you who is going undercover under other user names.
[/QUOTE]
Hand on heart mckey isn't me, but you probably know that. Perhaps he can come back and give us some more info though? Oh, and it seems you forgot but I'll remind you. You recently PM'd me several times to stop antagonising Black King on the Long Beach Arena '77 thread..
Fmarton · Member since
Thank you very much!
darkorian1 · Member since
Gracias!
MercurialFreddie · Member since
Barry, Sir GH, please stop that. we don't need a war here especially considering you're both one of those few posters here who tremendously contributed to this forum.
@people on streets
I too don't have a problem with hoarders but now that the recording (no matter how good or bad is it) has been shared, the master tape is of less value. We've heard the show and the performance is excellent and the person hoarding the tape wants to capitalize on what ? Quality ? Sharing it here would be an example of really nice generosity. What's more, I do believe (if the master tape would be truly a vast improvement) that people on Queenzone would even pay this person for this tape.
mckey · Member since
I wasn´t actually talking about the OWNER of the master tape but I referred to a user on Queenzone who has a digital copy of the master tape recording and this person is hoarding the show (I don´t think the owner of the master tape is on Queenzone).
And yes, there´s a noticable difference between the inferiour recording and the master tape - the audio quality is better and it has almost all the songs on it
I´m not so much annoyed by the fact that this person on Queenzone didn´t share the recording publically but by the fact that they were involved in putting this inferiour version up and yet they were pretending as if they were surprised by how good this concert is (they had 3 YEARS to listen to this concert) That´s what´s bothering me.
If you own a uncirculated recording of a show and don´t want to share it for whatever reason - that´s ok with me. BUT don´t act all surprised and don´t push yourself into getting involved in publishing an INFERIOUR recording of the show and pretend to know nothinng about the master tape recording. That´s hypocrisy in my opinion! If you own a digital copy of the master tape, just be f´ing quiet.
And no, Barry Burex, I wasn´t referring to you as the hoarder.
Barry Durex · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]mckey wrote:[/b]
I wasn´t actually talking about the OWNER of the master tape but I referred to a user on Queenzone who has a digital copy of the master tape recording and this person is hoarding the show (I don´t think the owner of the master tape is on Queenzone).
And yes, there´s a noticable difference between the inferiour recording and the master tape - the audio quality is better and it has almost all the songs on it
I´m not so much annoyed by the fact that this person on Queenzone didn´t share the recording publically but by the fact that they were involved in putting this inferiour version up and yet they were pretending as if they were surprised by how good this concert is (they had 3 YEARS to listen to this concert) That´s what´s bothering me.
If you own a uncirculated recording of a show and don´t want to share it for whatever reason - that´s ok with me. BUT don´t act all surprised and don´t push yourself into getting involved in publishing an INFERIOUR recording of the show and pretend to know nothinng about the master tape recording. That´s hypocrisy in my opinion! If you own a digital copy of the master tape, just be f´ing quiet.
And no, Barry Burex, I wasn´t referring to you as the hoarder.[/QUOTE]
Thanks for coming back. I assume you have a digital copy yourself, so the next obvious question is.......... ;)
Art Lawyer · Member since
Thank you very much!
mckey · Member since
This may surprise you - but I actually don´t have a digital copy of the show. I have listened to the master tape recording before though and I know who has the copy of the master tape.
Barry Durex · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]mckey wrote:[/b]
This may surprise you - but I actually don´t have a digital copy of the show. I have listened to the master tape recording before though and I know who has the copy of the master tape.[/QUOTE]
No problem, lets see what comes out in the wash then.
