Is queen lying about budapest 86?

[QUOTE] [b]on my way up wrote:[/b]

They're not lyung about Budapest.
They are lying about Knebworth though ;-) :-) :-)[/QUOTE]

Here's my theory, I could be 100% wrong.

From what I could see on Queenlive.ca, only 3 gigs have the Big Screen above the stage, these were the two Wembley shows and Knebworth. My theory is that any gig with the big screen was recorded.

Not too mention that they seemed to have a satisfaction with filming the last gig on some tours; Tokyo 1/5, Hammersmith '75, Hyde Park, Hammersmith '79, etc.

Also, why would they lie about not having it? Then again, they do some daft things...

-Chin

[QUOTE] [b]Marlamir wrote:[/b]
Luckily i still have original 16 cameras version, file is litlle bit compressed to save some space but vithout losing quality. [/QUOTE]
350M mp4 for 100min it's not "without losing quality".
Do you have some other audio devices beside the tablet? Like a CD player, turntable, amplifier, speakers. Have you ever touched a reel-to-reel tape recorder?
It seems your only asset is enthusiasm, but luckily this is highly praised here, so i predict you'll have a fine career on queenzone.

^ An articulate and factual response, keep it up.

Why not. They lied about John being a singet in their videos and concerts.

as crazy at it sounds, I do believe that the remaining footage has been destroyed. same goes for Montreal 81.
This was decades before dvd and "bonus features" and "director's cut" on home releases in the world of music became what it is now.

....what's even more crazy though, if it is indeed true, is the story about Queen refusing to buy the complete film in the early 90s.

im srry guys that i put link here for shitty quality of 16 cam and telling that this is the original one but its not. i tought that because of the wrong speed. srry again.

after queen refuse to buy the uncut version maybe its not got delete but ended up in private hands. i read some rumours that this can be true so who knows :-/