I saw Paul as well and he was more than ok! Had a problem with the name as well but as he was no abomination like the parrott i could live with it. He is a legend himself and not some laughable karaoke clown
He had plenty time to become a legend, he was in his late 50's when he was performing with Queen. I like Paul's stuff with Free/Bad Company, love his voice but it wasn't the best fit with Queen. Some songs worked but there were some they couldn't really do. Not saying it was bad but I do prefer him doing his own stuff.
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
I saw Paul as well and he was more than ok! Had a problem with the name as well but as he was no abomination like the parrott i could live with it. He is a legend himself and not some laughable karaoke clown[/QUOTE]
I loved Q+PR, even though I had a qualm about the name Queen being used. I really liked what PR did with the Queen songs. And ROTC will always be my favorite that they did. I look at Q+PR as more rock and roll than what Q+AL ever was and likely ever will be.
rockchic you call yourself rockchic and have no clue! PR was a legend already when he was in Free and Bad Company. He was younger than the bird with no wings. In his 20's!True some songs did not work but in comparison with the goat at least some worked great. And the BC/Free material was superb, How did the Lameturd material go? I remember no one gave two fux about his solo song lol
I was meaning that by comparison Adam had been on the scene for a small amount of time before joining up with Brian & Roger. No idea what you inferred from my comment.
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
no real old QUeen fan likes Lamebird believe me[/QUOTE]
Sweeping statement that you can't prove
From the comments on facebook you'd be wrong, as you well know runner since you constantly reply to them all.
Sexy beast:
http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/adam-lambert-attends-wolk-morais-collection-6-fashion-show-at-the-picture-id906276218?s=612x612
[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b]
Sexy beast:
http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/adam-lambert-attends-wolk-morais-collection-6-fashion-show-at-the-picture-id906276218?s=612x612[/QUOTE]
Has nothing to do with the recent tour.
[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b]
Sexy beast:
http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/adam-lambert-attends-wolk-morais-collection-6-fashion-show-at-the-picture-id906276218?s=612x612[/QUOTE]
Has nothing to do with the recent tour.
"With two performances at Sydney’s Qudos Bank Arena, Queen + Adam Lambert earns the top ranking on the latest weekly slate of Hot Tours (see list, below) with a $3.3 million gross."
They must reallysuck!
Britney SPears and Bieber sell more. And they suck as well. WHats your point - you wanted to prove they suck? Well the proof is out there
I think the only proof is in your mind! The ACTUAL FACTS, like tickets sold, fan feedback, and constantly bigger tours and venues don't support your postition. But when is a fact going to shut you up, right?
AS I told you numbers are not equal to quality - if so Bieber and Spears would be musical geniusses which they are obviously in your logic.
What FACTS do you mean? The fact that the parrot ladyboy looks totally lost on a bog stage, the FACT, that he sings like a goat, the FACT, that he cannot pull off a rock song to save his life and that he has no musical talent whatsoever.
These are the FACTs
No they are still opinions, and in a minority at that.
