Skip to content
Queen crest Queenzone.org

The best Posting on QAL EVER - period

850 posts Page 52 of 57
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum
V
I would say the evidence shows only two people don't get the humour most of the time.

One is obsessed with Lamberts position in Queen to the point he has to post the same negativity over and over again

The other one, is a deranged half wit who can't string a sentence together in order to state what he is thinking without resorting to pure abuse of the subject and the people he is replying too.

Because of their joint mindset and obvious moral and maturity limitations, the contents of what they post is pretty worthless. What I find vaguely amusing is that they are the only two who can't see the limitations of the situation they have created for themselves.
S
Vocal Harmony We do not give a toss what you or anybody else thinks on this site.
You do not own the site and your views are as important as vomit outside a kebab shop on a Friday night.
Try posting your obnoxious crap on You Tube and wait for the abuse back there but 100 times worse than on here.
R
Awesome posting over on fb (classic rock Magazine)

All above true! He really is 'wooden'. He looks great, has a fantastic range, great control, but....it's just....hollow or something. There is no depth/dynamic/soul to anything. He's like a pseudo Freddie mannequin or something. Just something to put in front while the hits are blaring and everyone just sees and hears what they want. Then they wear the concert shirt and walk around claiming to have seen 'Queen'. Really fucked up.....



Apart from the "looks and sounds great" he is spot on 110%
R
More over


I can't believe the Brits would accept this sacrilege. All the idiots here in the US I can understand, but Queen is so much more sacred over there, I am shocked that they would go in for the game show winner version of this once mighty band.



All comments over there agree. Thats what the folks outside the queen circle think
S
Great Post RUNNER ! Yes outside the Queen circle many many people have told me when i asked them what do you think of Queen with Adam Lambert? Reply: some say "who is he"? others say Not the same band with out Freddie so not interested.
Some Queen fans will take any garbage from Brian & Roger if they say something is great. It is all hype and at the end of this combo when Queen retire they will look back and regret what they have done i promise you.
Queen with Lambert are now more gayer than Bronski Beat or even the Communards and that is saying something!
They are supposed to be a British dynamic rock band not a west end musical for all the nellies to go and see.
I do not see any of the hard rock fans in the audiences now like when Queen were strong back in there days with Freddie, so even those fans have ditched the band to be replaced by Glamberts and mams and dads.
R
runner_70 wrote:

Awesome posting over on fb (classic rock Magazine)

All above true! He really is 'wooden'. He looks great, has a fantastic range, great control, but....it's just....hollow or something. There is no depth/dynamic/soul to anything. He's like a pseudo Freddie mannequin or something. Just something to put in front while the hits are blaring and everyone just sees and hears what they want. Then they wear the concert shirt and walk around claiming to have seen 'Queen'. Really fucked up.....



Apart from the "looks and sounds great" he is spot on 110%




Hm, well aren't you a prize wally, or very clever, I can't decide which. You made out in the title that classic rock magazine had wrote that, turns out it was some guy posting under a classic rock article not the magazine itself.

Can you put it's just a quote from some guy in future, I mean I could copy and paste a shit ton of quotes saying the complete opposite from people all over facebook, all it proves is people have opinions.

R
happystar wrote:

I do not see any of the hard rock fans in the audiences now like when Queen were strong back in there days with Freddie, so even those fans have ditched the band to be replaced by Glamberts and mams and dads.


Not true, there's loads of original Queen fans at the shows, they post about it afterwards, very often saying they were skeptical or wary of going but wanted to see Brian & Roger but were blown away and would definitely go again. Obviously it's not for everyone but you really are way off the mark.
R
I said it was a fb posting and all others agreed. Those that rave over Lamebird are the Glamtart nellies. The rockfans outside queen are those that laugh about this collaboration. True 120%. But i guess rockchic does know it all better
R
Some other quotes


I can't believe the Brits would accept this sacrilege. All the idiots here in the US I can understand, but Queen is so much more sacred over there, I am shocked that they would go in for the game show winner version of this once mighty band.


Adam Lambert has terrible stage presence. He is so wooden.


The worst is him wearing that stupid crown. Don‘t like his voice either.

Adam SUCKS!!!...It's Simple! No Freddie = No Queen!..


Thats what most folks of the hardrock and classic rock community think of him and they are spot on. Of course the next posting here will be twitter links of glamtarts but the majority in the rockworld laugh about Maylor. They lost their credibilty completely.
R
runner_70 wrote:

I said it was a fb posting and all others agreed. Those that rave over Lamebird are the Glamtart nellies. The rockfans outside queen are those that laugh about this collaboration. True 120%. But i guess rockchic does know it all better


All the others, it was two guys and you. Do I really need to find all the posts on facebook from guys who've seen Queen live back in the day and are now loving these shows? You know the one's, you argue with them constantly and get shot down every time but I'm willing to trawl back through some old posts to prove my point if you like.
S
Nothing but bigotry and homophobia on display by these two obnoxious trolls!
V
rockchic65 wrote:

happystar wrote:

I do not see any of the hard rock fans in the audiences now like when Queen were strong back in there days with Freddie, so even those fans have ditched the band to be replaced by Glamberts and mams and dads.


Not true, there's loads of original Queen fans at the shows, they post about it afterwards, very often saying they were skeptical or wary of going but wanted to see Brian & Roger but were blown away and would definitely go again. Obviously it's not for everyone but you really are way off the mark.


The first line in happystar's post says it all, "I do not see any hard rock fans in the audience" By his own admission he hasn't been to any of these gigs so he hasn't seen any fans "hard rock" or otherwise. Nothing he posts is based on first hand experience. But then he is quick to tell other people he doesn't care what they post.

There were plenty of hard rock fans and fans of old at all the shows and plenty saying the shows were amazing and Lambert is great. .

Of course we all know that having been to the gigs these people's opinions are worthless because nappystar is in a better position to judge

He 's only two steps behind runner 3 and a half in the stupidity stakes


S
vocal harmony get off here you have a psychiatric appointment at 1pm so hurry along and doctor can put you on seroxat.
V
happystar wrote:

vocal harmony get off here you have a psychiatric appointment at 1pm so hurry along and doctor can put you on seroxat.


You seem to know what the drug is, obviously something you take regularly.

Yet again, a point/argument has been made which you can't reply to, so you go for the childish option and try an insult instead
R
You see that the glamtarts are completely in denial when the proof is there for all to see. Most old school rockers hate qal