Unless you have heard Adam in concert with Queen, you have no idea how powerful that voice is. Videos are not close to being accurate. Adam can drown out the band and his voices just rings in the rafters of the venues no matter how large. I have seen him twice with Queen and about 10 times total and there is nothing weak or feeble about his voice. Havng a higher voice does not equate to weak or feeble. He can fill the venue like any operatic tenor. You can take that off of your ridiculous list of QAL deficits. He has a huge voice and can hold a note for 25 or more secs at pretty much the same volume and on pitch. There are not many singers who can do that. You are only fooling yourself if you think there is anything subpar about his world class quality voice. Just read some of the comments from opera and classical teachers and other singers and directors with whom he has worked. Weak and feeble or any other criticism is just not there. It is only in your head and people who are never going to like anything but Freddie. That is a valid viewpoint, but you don't need to denigrate other singers because they aren't Freddie and your particular cup of tea. Brian and Roger picked him because he isn't Freddie. It was a conscious decision and I would say 99% of the people who ATTEND the concert don't have any complaints. You prefer a different kind of voice and that is OK, but just stop the constant vicious remarks. You sound like a broken record!
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Unless you have heard Adam in concert with Queen, you have no idea how powerful that voice is. Videos are not close to being accurate. Adam can drown out the band and his voices just rings in the rafters of the venues no matter how large. I have seen him twice with Queen and about 10 times total and there is nothing weak or feeble about his voice. Havng a higher voice does not equate to weak or feeble. He can fill the venue like any operatic tenor. You can take that off of your ridiculous list of QAL deficits. He has a huge voice and can hold a note for 25 or more secs at pretty much the same volume and on pitch. There are not many singers who can do that. You are only fooling yourself if you think there is anything subpar about his world class quality voice. Just read some of the comments from opera and classical teachers and other singers and directors with whom he has worked. Weak and feeble or any other criticism is just not there. It is only in your head and people who are never going to like anything but Freddie. That is a valid viewpoint, but you don't need to denigrate other singers because they aren't Freddie and your particular cup of tea. Brian and Roger picked him because he isn't Freddie. It was a conscious decision and I would say 99% of the people who ATTEND the concert don't have any complaints. You prefer a different kind of voice and that is OK, but just stop the constant vicious remarks. You sound like a broken record!
Holly2003 wrote:
SweetCaroline wrote:
Why? Because Frank was a very talented and successful singer who didn’t play a musical instrument or write his own music!
Maybe, as with Lambert, that explains why his appeal is mainly to grannies and Vegas lounge lizards.
Ouch ;-).
Sniflese You are the one who replies back time after time repeating your garbage as well. Having a powerful voice does not make anyone a great singer.
I do not just like Freddie as i have other favourite singers, like Tina Turner, Anastacia, Suzi Quatro, Abba, Paul McCartney , etc........ Those people have soul in there voices where Adam does have a plain sharp vocal which does not interest me at all. If Adams vocal had a colour it would be a washy grey.
I do not just like Freddie as i have other favourite singers, like Tina Turner, Anastacia, Suzi Quatro, Abba, Paul McCartney , etc........ Those people have soul in there voices where Adam does have a plain sharp vocal which does not interest me at all. If Adams vocal had a colour it would be a washy grey.
Washy grey? Oh my!
Which live show was it again that you attended?
Which live show was it again that you attended?
SweetCaroline wrote:
Washy grey? Oh my!
Which live show was it again that you attended?
You are still after profits from ticket sales, I reckon.
XD
sweetcaroline i would rather be dead than witness a car crash with Queen and Lambert and that is the truth.
It is so painful to watch.
It is so painful to watch.
But you have never watched it!
I have never watched a Britney Show in person as well whats your point. Youd think id like it if i was there? Bullcrap. AL stays rhw annoying talentless twat he is and i dont need to be there in person id hate it even more if i spent money on this abomination
sweetcaroline I have seen Lambert & Queen on Tv and it turns my stomach that the band i adore has resorted to this pathetic level.
Desperation in desperate times i think.
Desperation in desperate times i think.
Ha! Nothing desperate about their brilliant and spectacular performances!
SweetCaroline Compare Queens performances with Freddie & John on board and then compare it to Queen with Lambert and you will a massive deterioration of quality and stage persona.
happystar wrote:
SweetCaroline Compare Queens performances with Freddie & John on board and then compare it to Queen with Lambert and you will a massive deterioration of quality and stage persona.
Maybe those of us who've embraced this collaboration don't compare so instead of a deterioration we just see a difference. Brian and Roger are still great especially considering their ages, Spike does a great job as musical director, Neil's not John but he's still a good bass player and Adam is himself, totally different than Freddie but then who would be like him? IMO it's unfair to make comparisons in that way.
I’ve seen the original Queen performances. Freddie was definitely the whole show and his body never stopped moving even when he was sitting by the piano with the beer glasses lined up in a row!
Freddie hardly drank beer on stage please leave us alone with your sad Queen knowledge