Vocal Harmony In 1973 David Bowie wore more make up than anyone! Freddie had barely taken the top of his eyeliner by then!
My oh my you are on all these fucking threads today bullying folk.
You sound like a right miserable git.
Bet you dont have many mates in your life so you come on here twisting your poison into threads.
I was just replying to your idiotic comment.
Stop judging others by your own short comings or sad one dimensional life.
I've just pulled you up for miss quoting me on another thread. If that bothers you so much you shouldn't have done it, should you!
Vocal Harmony You are the only one on here who could have an argument locked up in a coffin, you are sad obnoxious arrogant and a loser matey.
I have seen you on here years ago arguing with folk and everyone knows you come on here causing trouble for everyone with your sour comments that turns a discussion into a fucking battle zone.
Do yourself a favour mate get to the vets and get put down and save us the pain of your sarky jibes on here.
We can see who uses foul language and snarky comments and seems to be a nasty piece of work and it isn't Vocal Harmony!
Thank you snifflese, but I'm afraid pointing out the glaringly obvious won't be obvious to the person you're pointing it out too!
Unfortunately, I would have to agree. We have several of those here on the boards!
SNIFFLESE I am not a fan of yours too and couldnt give a flying fuchsia what you and all the glampricks think of me including the blue meany vocal harmony.
stamp your feet as much as you all want but i know Queen were sheer perfection with Freddie and now it is not Queen in any shape or form.
You come across as a right prude.
That is what you don't get, Happy. No one ever said that Queen with Freddie was not sheer perfection. I don't recall anyone saying that. People say QAL is really good. How does their being really good take away from Queen's former perfection? That is the part I don't get. You, Runner, and Icy are just bonkers about anything nice said about Adam/QAL. That in no way takes away from the original Queen. We are talking two different entities now. It is as if liking QAL means you are stomping on Queen's legacy and that just isn't the case. You can love, love old Queen and really appreciate what QAL is doing in the here and now and anything they do now, does not take away from the lustre of what Queen was. I don't know how to say it any better than that, but I hope you get my poing.
Snifflese The point is Queen+ is a fraud because it is not Queen in any shape or form, the only truth of that name is you do get Adam Lambert but the Queen bit is false.
Freddie and John made half of Queen up and now we only get half a band which does not = a full meaning of the word Queen.
If you think Queen died in 1991, why do you continue to post in a Queen forum?
I’m starting to feel sorry for Rami Malek because now HE has begun to get the nasty flak from some Queen fans that HE isn’t perfect enough to portray Freddie in the biopic movie.
It proves one thing to me — each one of us who are born into this world are so unique that no one else can copy or duplicate us!
I think that is a pretty amazing thing to ponder!
I think the second point would be, why bother to post in the QAL thread, if you guys are only on board with Queen before 1991? I have no problem with anyone not liking QAL and it makes perfect sense to me. Some folks only love the original and as I said, no problem. But why make it a point to post here with snarky, nasty comments? That is the part I can't wrap my head around. I do think it keeps follks who enjoy QAL from posting. It isn't worth the flak you get and there can never be a good discussion about anything. I also don't understand why that question means Queen and QAL are the same? Obviously no one thinks that or there wouldn't be a Queen Plus thread! Making them the same is only in the mind of the Queen fans and that is where the problem lies.
