An article I wrote about '39

Comments, corrections, etc., are all welcome.

I enjoyed the testimonies at the end of the article.

I skimmed the rest of the article, as my understanding of music theory is lacking. "Chromatic progression" did ring a bell from my college days, but I lack knowledge of what that term means, Also, I am not capable of learning the meaning of this term, because I am half brained in that my "right" brain is a shrivelled raisin.

Who the fuck is gonna read that? It is a song on a Queen album about the time distortion effect.

End.

(That is about as clever as I need to be)

[QUOTE] [b]mooghead wrote:[/b]

Who the fuck is gonna read that?[/QUOTE]

A couple of people already did. So there.

[QUOTE] [b]Sebastian wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]mooghead wrote:[/b]

Who the fuck is gonna read that?[/QUOTE]

A couple of people already did. So there.[/QUOTE]

... but did they read every word?

Great article. Congratulations.

[QUOTE] [b]Haemophilia Love wrote:[/b]

... but did they read every word?[/QUOTE]

Probably. It's not that hard. Anyone with an IQ over 50 can do it. So, yeah, I can understand how hard it may seem to some, but still...

This is great. Painstakingly detailed and exhaustive, like all of your writings but I must say I skimmed through some of the more detailed analysis. I'll get back to it later to read it in full when I have more time.

Great job. Is this part of a bigger piece? I know you had (still have?) a Queen music analysis website.

PS: I know he supposedly changed his name legally to Frederick and you're technically correct in calling him that but I find it super annoying. No disrespect intended.

So far, at least 3/4 of the documented responders have an IQ of 50 or less.

[QUOTE] [b]Wiley wrote:[/b]

I'll get back to it later to read it in full when I have more time.
[/QUOTE]

Thanks. There's no rush.

[QUOTE] [b]Wiley wrote:[/b]

I know you had (still have?) a Queen music analysis website.
[/QUOTE]

It's not mine. I only contributed a little bit to one of the sections in there, but most of what I wrote there is now outdated. Another one of my tasks for later.

[QUOTE] [b]Wiley wrote:[/b]

PS: I know he supposedly changed his name legally to Frederick and you're technically correct in calling him that but I find it super annoying. No disrespect intended.

[/QUOTE]

Best cure for that is exposure.

[QUOTE] [b]Haemophilia Love wrote:[/b]

So far, at least 3/4 of the documented responders have an IQ of 50 or less.[/QUOTE]

Not really. All they've said is that they haven't read it all, not that they *can't* read it all. They're different concepts.

A pretty much interestingly-deep space & travel time Queen song analogy. Well-done Sebastian. ’Just fly away, far away’.

[QUOTE] [b]Sebastian wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Wiley wrote:[/b]

I'll get back to it later to read it in full when I have more time.
[/QUOTE]

Thanks. There's no rush.

[QUOTE] [b]Wiley wrote:[/b]

I know you had (still have?) a Queen music analysis website.
[/QUOTE]

It's not mine. I only contributed a little bit to one of the sections in there, but most of what I wrote there is now outdated. Another one of my tasks for later.

[QUOTE] [b]Wiley wrote:[/b]

PS: I know he supposedly changed his name legally to Frederick and you're technically correct in calling him that but I find it super annoying. No disrespect intended.

[/QUOTE]

Best cure for that is exposure.

[QUOTE] [b]Haemophilia Love wrote:[/b]

So far, at least 3/4 of the documented responders have an IQ of 50 or less.[/QUOTE]

Not really. All they've said is that they haven't read it all, not that they *can't* read it all. They're different concepts.[/QUOTE]

So ... if I manage to read the whole thing, but don't understand it, is my IQ irrevocably under 50?

Not necessarily. That's not how it works.

Thanks, Sebastian, for this great article!

It's a very good article with some interesting and informative stuff. Keep the good hard work.