If you can't understand the difference between posters and tickets done with dot matrix printers, then I guess that's your problem.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
The Real Wizard wrote:
It's because it was a cheap ticket printed with dot matrix, and they likely couldn't use multiple text sizes. It was the 70s.
It seems they had it cracked by the following night though www.queenconcerts.com/inc/tickets/1975-03-07.jpg
The Real Wizard wrote:
If you can't understand the difference between posters and tickets done with dot matrix printers, then I guess that's your problem.
No, it seems to be yours.
Devil's Advocate wrote:
The Real Wizard wrote:
It's because it was a cheap ticket printed with dot matrix, and they likely couldn't use multiple text sizes. It was the 70s.
It seems they had it cracked by the following night though www.queenconcerts.com/inc/tickets/1975-03-07.jpg
The text you're referring to isn't dot matrix.
This review of the show also indicates that Queen weren't the headliner.
When you're done making a fool out of yourself, just let us know, m'kay?
When you're done making a fool out of yourself, just let us know, m'kay?
The Real Wizard wrote:
This review of the show also indicates that Queen weren't the headliner.
When you're done making a fool out of yourself, just let us know, m'kay?
Read that some time back and I'm still not convinced I'm afraid. In the third paragraph he describes the Queen and REO Speedwagon bill in that order, does that matter? Sometimes it does with you, and sometimes it doesn't. Or is it one of those double header affairs you speak of where both bands are the headline act, regardless of who goes on first? I appreciate that trying to be right about this ''solitary'' gig now means everything to you, but it's YOU who looks the fool when you constantly contradict yourself. Sadly it seems that a hybrid dot matrix printer (or whatever it is you want to call it) was not used (or not yet invented) to print out tickets until the following nights concert, so that doesn't help. Like I said before, the onus is on you to prove without doubt what you say is right, rather than expect somebody else prove it isn't. All I have done is question the ''evidence''. I haven't made any factual claim as to who supported who, so I can't be wrong, but only time will tell if you are. I'll leave it there cos I'm bored now.
>The Real Wizard's website is so comprehensive and so INFINITELY BETTER than the similar +official product+QPL have out there
That's actually true.
That's actually true.
Is the similar website a reference to queenconcerts.com or some other website?