user1 wrote:
@ Brian May: Please die soon. You're ruining the legacy of what was one of the biggest bands in the world. Many thanks.
I hope you are kidding about the "please die soon". O.o
user1 wrote:
@ Brian May: Please die soon. You're ruining the legacy of what was one of the biggest bands in the world. Many thanks.
Iron Butterfly wrote:
user1 wrote:
@ Brian May: Please die soon. You're ruining the legacy of what was one of the biggest bands in the world. Many thanks.
I hope you are kidding about the "please die soon". O.o
Dr Magus wrote:
Iron Butterfly wrote:
user1 wrote:
@ Brian May: Please die soon. You're ruining the legacy of what was one of the biggest bands in the world. Many thanks.
I hope you are kidding about the "please die soon". O.o
The sooner they all die the sooner we can have our anthology box sets!
Day dop wrote:
All too often these days, you hear "Freddie would've thought..." or "Freddie would've loved..." and now it's "Freddie would've hated".
To me, it seems to be people saying what they'd like Freddie to think, including Brian.
fruhzs wrote:
Personally, even though I respect Adam’s singing abilities, and have even went to see them play live once, there’s really no comparison. It’s like comparing something unique in its own right in many ways (Freddie) with something fairly competent but more “ordinary” in a sense. And I know ordinary may be not the best word to describe (English isn’t my first language), as Adam is indeed a great singer and has a very good technique. However, I don’t feel I’m listening to something unique and special when I hear him, not only with Queen but also with his original material or other covers. It lacks a bit of IT factor for me, a proper own style and “voice charisma” if that makes any sense. There are singers who are very less gifted than him and Freddie, and have more personality in their voices and make them more special to listen to than Adam imo, like even Paul Rodgers for example.
Singing on those concerts is not only about hitting the notes, having a great range and proper technique imo. It’s about “selling a song”, interpreting it and adding soul to the music, making it unique. That’s what makes certain artists shine and others not so much. Imo he translates well into some Queen songs, but not all of them,
And that’s brings me to some of the reasons why I think Freddie was a better singer (and much better front man), cause he was unique. His tone was better, he had more than good enough range when not I’ll (impressive range when not I’ll actially), he interpreted the songs with a lot of heart and passion, knew when and how to made them simple, and he was much more versatile as a singer imo. Actually maybe IMO one of the more verstaile singers ever.
How many singers you can picture singing stuff as Lily of The Valley, and Gimme the Prize? So differently that some might not notice it’s the same singer? Any of us could list a vast number of such different songs where Freddie interpreted them in so many different ways, using different nuances, techniques, approaches, etc.
His delivery was unique and it’s not a coincidence he will be remember forever. A lot of people who are not into Queen see him as a singer icon, and don’t even acknowledge his song writing skills. That’s how good of a singer he was.
Sebastian wrote:
Day dop wrote:
All too often these days, you hear "Freddie would've thought..." or "Freddie would've loved..." and now it's "Freddie would've hated".
To me, it seems to be people saying what they'd like Freddie to think, including Brian.
I agree, but having people speculating over what he would've thought would've been Frederick's favourite legacy.
Golden Salmon wrote:
So, anyone looking forward to the movie's post-credits scene with Adam Lambert? They're trying to build a cinematic universe here.