Freddie confirms Queen are not Queen if four members are not there

[QUOTE] [b]Mr Right wrote:[/b]

THISTLE : I am not bothered what you think about me, so call me all you want. You like to come on here just to get the limelight and troll my threads just like many of the others who have no intention in discussing the thread.
Maybe you all should be in a creche. Who cares what you say on here i don't.
[/QUOTE]

I don't care what you think either. It works two ways.

However, if you must reply, at least do so without the lies. I didn't troll your thread - I (and many others) DID discuss it with you, but because it wasn't what you wanted to hear, you took a hissy fit.

Yet again, you've dismissed everyone as wrong and yet again you've been shown up for the idiot you are.

You want people to accept your opinions, but you're not prepared to accept theirs. Utter tool.

[QUOTE] [b]Mr Right wrote:[/b]

Freddie trained his own incredible voice and taught himself piano, that is what i call a genius.
[/QUOTE]

Plenty of professional singers seek vocal lessons, and it's nothing to be ashamed of. If Mercury did so, it wouldn't make him less of a genius. If anything, he loses points for not seeking lessons, as his inability to take care of his voice often hampered his performances (sometimes entire tours). You can count the number of times he sang We Are The Champions properly on one hand.

Both Marc Martel and Adam Lambert, on the other hand, are able to sing all of the songs exactly like the albums every night for years on end. Any professional singer is wise to keep a good coach on the payroll.

There are also 8 year old self-taught pianists on YouTube who are better than Mercury was. He performed at about a grade 4 level, which is acceptable for most pop-oriented music. He also took piano lessons as a child, as stated in countless biographies.

He was indeed a genius, but you don't seem to understand why.

Of course you're going to come back with some kind of personal attack towards me and the last few people who handed your ass to you, but deep down it really must suck to know that virtually everything you say results in people smarter than you pointing out how wrong you are.

And he did take some lessons, if only briefly. That doesn't automatically invalidate his growth as a (mostly self-taught) singer, the same way someone who's been schooled is not by any means 'less talented' that someone who hasn't.

Thistle You are the tool because you just cannot help yourself follow me around this site and leave your trail of venom behind.
If you cannot have a decent discussion then get off this site. (By the way i would rather be a tool than a fanny like you.

[QUOTE] [b]Mr Right wrote:[/b]

Vocal Harmony I think i am very entitled to comment on Queen since they have had my money for 45 years.
Adam did not make it possible for Queen to tour again, because it was Paul Rodgers who made it possible for the band to tour again, so get your facts right Mr know it all.
Where you get this Geordie rumour from i do not know as i do not live in Newcastle.
Adam is a complete joke and his voice is nowhere as natural as Freddie's voice. Lambert had singing lessons and Freddie trained his own incredible voice and taught himself piano, that is what i call a genius.
[/QUOTE]

They've had your money for 45 years, so was that for the music and concert tickets you bought or was it some joint ownership argreement you paid into? I'll answer it for you, you bought the music etc, it doesn't make them your Queen.

The Paul Rodgers thing ended in 2009. They had no plans to tour again, as Queen. They found Lambert through Spike Edney, it all fell into place, making it possible for them to tour again, as I said, maybe you should get your facts right!

As regard voices and lessons, yes Freddie had an amazing voice which he failed to look after and therefore was unable to use to it's full potential on stage regularly. I was listening to the 82 Sebou Lions concert last night, Freddie's voice on parts of that are shot, and that's not the worse live vocal performance that exists. But compare that to the shows Lambert has played with them, he has never sounded anywhere near that bad, the same goes for Paul Rodgers.

Freddie had piano lessons as has been explained to you already, Mr know all

VH It was Paul Rodgers that got Queen back on the road and they toured or have you been a sleep for the past 10 years? Dopey Vocal Harmony eh?
Freddie and Adam Lambert are different artists, so you cannot compare them both.
Mercury is a rock & Roller, Lambert is a glorified west end singer who does not exert himself on stage like Freddie used to do.
Mercury been the grafter and Lambert been the lazy boy on stage.

[QUOTE] [b]Mr Right wrote:[/b]

Thistle You are the tool because you just cannot help yourself follow me around this site and leave your trail of venom behind.
If you cannot have a decent discussion then get off this site. (By the way i would rather be a tool than a fanny like you.[/QUOTE]

Listen, thickhead - don't tell me to get off this site. I've been here for at least a decade whilst you don't know who you are from day to day. I am not spreading venom. I have discussed things with you, as have others - but you don't want to accept OUR opinions but want us to accept YOURS? And because we tell you you're wrong, that's somehow trolling and we've to fuck off.

No, you fuck off, you absolute twat.

Re-read your opening line there. Now read your last line. Tell me how any of that makes sense! I'm a tool, but you'd rather be the tool so I'm a fanny? Okay, so you're still admitting you're a tool?

This whole forum has turned into Queen circa 1984. What we need is a Live Aid style event to bring us all together.

[QUOTE] [b]Mr Right wrote:[/b]

Mercury been the grafter and Lambert been the lazy boy on stage.[/QUOTE]

Considering how much he works to sing as well as he does and to keep his level, he's definitely not lazy.

Thistle: Your comment was read then considered and then totally dismissed !
I do not need your warped opinions on my thread you are not wanted so do one.

[QUOTE] [b]Mr Right wrote:[/b]

VH It was Paul Rodgers that got Queen back on the road and they toured or have you been a sleep for the past 10 years? Dopey Vocal Harmony eh?
Freddie and Adam Lambert are different artists, so you cannot compare them both.
Mercury is a rock & Roller, Lambert is a glorified west end singer who does not exert himself on stage like Freddie used to do.
Mercury been the grafter and Lambert been the lazy boy on stage.[/QUOTE]

I didn't say that they hadn't toured with Paul Rodgers. You seem to have to make stuff up in order to reply in a way that makes you feel justified.

All I said was after Rodgers ( you know? After they toured, recorded then toured again) they thought that touring as Queen+ was over. Lamber made it possible to tour again. AFTER PAUL RODGERS DOPEY GERRYHAPPYRIGHT!

"Freddie and Adam Lambert are different artists so you can't compare them" that is what you said isn't it? Only you do nothing but compare them DOPEY GERRYHAPPYRIGHT

[QUOTE] [b]Mr Right wrote:[/b]

Thistle: Your comment was read then considered and then totally dismissed !
I do not need your warped opinions on my thread you are not wanted so do one.[/QUOTE]

Shut up you fucking muppet. I'll be around long after you're gone. This is not your site. This is not your forum. I'll respond to whatever topics I like - and if you don't like my opinions, tough shite. Again, you don't want to accept other people's views (even when it's not even a view, but blatant facts that blow your stupid-arse statements out the water) yet we must all bow down to your superior (not!) knowledge?

Like I say, you've shown yourself up time and again, and much smarter people have tried to put you right. I guess muppets just can't be taught. We all know what you are.

Amen Mr Thistle now go and get yourself back on the psychiatric ward for your meds lol
sad cunt.

sebastian: Compare Lambert to Freddie on stage for five minutes, Mercury absolutely dripping in pools of sweat & Lambert still dry as a tampax.
I rest my case.