[QUOTE] [b]Sealion wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b]
“It just isn’t any fun to post. I have never really done it before prior to here and it has been a bad experience.”
Another one bites the dust! There are only two “Glamberts” left over at QOL and they have to “curb their enthusiasm” over Adam so that icy and the milkman don’t go after them and get JPL so frustrated that he ha to ban them and lock up another thread. I have lost track of how many were locked. Some were deleted completely.
I wish Brian and Roger would tour with another front man just to prove that it isn’t Adam not being accepted but anyone who dares to travel that sacred ground.
[/QUOTE]
Once Glambert is sacked there will be bonfires at every Queen site. Every banned Glambert is a good Glambert! Well DOne QOL!
[/QUOTE]
LOL!
Says the man, who got banned from QOL after less than two weeks this year. And not for the first time...
There is a reason, why Gerry, Caroline and you are stuck here.
Plus Butterfly, who follows Caroline from forum to forum. Yes, Iron Butterfly is always much more active in the forum, where Caroline is active as well. It’s very obvious. ;)
Merry Christmas, you freaks!
[/QUOTE]
I'm not stuck here. I actually post about Queen from time to time here. What you might not realise is that sweetcaroline comes here after every ban to blame me for it...and blame me for much more.
Look at who it was who griped here about QOL earlier today and who brought it up yesterday to "get a rise" from me. Boom, just like that.
Recently she said about me as if I'm like Hitler, that she pretty much hates me so you see she's not innocent, in fact she can be very vindictive and bitter.
Merry Christmas sealion. ( A freak...well I've been called worse LOL. )
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b]
“It just isn’t any fun to post. I have never really done it before prior to here and it has been a bad experience.”
Another one bites the dust! There are only two “Glamberts” left over at QOL and they have to “curb their enthusiasm” over Adam so that icy and the milkman don’t go after them and get JPL so frustrated that he ha to ban them and lock up another thread. I have lost track of how many were locked. Some were deleted completely.
I wish Brian and Roger would tour with another front man just to prove that it isn’t Adam not being accepted but anyone who dares to travel that sacred ground.
[/QUOTE]
Once Glambert is sacked there will be bonfires at every Queen site. Every banned Glambert is a good Glambert! Well DOne QOL!
[/QUOTE]
Other than sweetcaroline, I don't know who else as a Glambert has been banned from QOL. It's something she likes to blame me for all the time, her bans and those of others. Not that she has any proof that I'm to blame, I've asked to provide the proof and she never has. It's her way of crap stirring and wanting people to feel sorry for her, I figure. Every time she ends up banned she thinks she has done nothing wrong, and it's all because of me, loving AL too much, posting about AL too much, if she answers my questions...she would like you and everyone else here to believe she's without fault.
Who cares about this??? NO ONE!! Too bad someone can't ban you and the other two creeps here either! This place needs a total cleanse at this point.
Regarding being banned at QOL, icy, consider yourself lucky that YAFF stands up for you to JLP and calls him out for “bullying” you.
The conversation on page 211 of the Adam Lambert thread shows how irritated JLP gets when you continue to bring up the Adam/Freddie/gay subject.
And yes that had something to do with me getting banned back in May and it also had something to do with the first time I got banned because you and your milkman buddy kept pushing it.
I remember you getting banned for a couple of months (?) but I don’t know the reason because it had nothing to do with me.
As for me wanting to go back there to take more abuse, no I won’t be doing that. It is appalling that people with positive messages are not tolerated. If I went back with nasty criticism of Adam, I would be welcomed with open arms!
No, you wouldn’t. Runner got banned there as well. He sure wasn’t positive about Q+.
My impression is, that YOU got banned, because of two reasons:
A) You keep pushing AL too much. Even if a thread isn’t about him.
B) You keep clashing with Butterfly/Icy.
I actually agree, that’s more her fault than your‘s. Because she does follow your posts, as I mentioned before. And she kept criticizing your posts to the attention of the mods.
It’s almost the same as here (only more civilized):
You two keep fighting. In order to stop this, the moderator has to throw one of you out. Since she keeps mostly silent, as long as you’re gone, he banns you. The one, who doesn’t get along with some of the other members either.
It’s that easy.
For all I know, there have been quite a few civil discussions on QOL about Q+ lately. And it’s more than just 2 glamberts. Actually, I wouldn’t call anyone there just a glambert. I see Queen fans talking about a collaboration.
But for all I know, even I‘ve been called a glambert more than once by now. So QOL must be full of them. Even the mods must be glamberts, because they banned the runner. ;)
I have no idea what “runner” calls himself at QOL. I thought he was milkman, Or is he YAFF, Icy’s bodyguatd? LOL
In May I posted an interview with Adam about the Freddie biopic in the biopic thread, Right away dear icy pounced on it because Adam was answering questions about his and Freddie’s sexual orientation. According to her he had no business talking about that subject. JLP right away moved the posts to the Adam thread.
I don’t read the posts at QOL very often but I see that icy is pretty much keeping a low profile since I’m not there. And the others are very careful. Again, there are some who can say whatever they want as long as it isn’t overly complimentary to Adam. When I was there, icy thought she was an assistant moderator and called out if there was duplicate information even if it had additional videos, etc. Nice things about Adam is called SPAM and multiple posts bitching about him isn’t called that.
[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b]
I have no idea what “runner” calls himself at QOL. I thought he was milkman, Or is he YAFF, Icy’s bodyguatd? LOL [/QUOTE]
None of it. But I won’t tell you more.
[QUOTE]
In May I posted an interview with Adam about the Freddie biopic in the biopic thread, Right away dear icy pounced on it because Adam was answering questions about his and Freddie’s sexual orientation. According to her he had no business talking about that subject. JLP right away moved the posts to the Adam thread.
I don’t read the posts at QOL very often but I see that icy is pretty much keeping a low profile since I’m not there. And the others are very careful. Again, there are some who can say whatever they want as long as it isn’t overly complimentary to Adam. When I was there, icy thought she was an assistant moderator and called out if there was duplicate information even if it had additional videos, etc. Nice things about Adam is called SPAM and multiple posts bitching about him isn’t called that.
[/QUOTE]
That’s one of the problems: Why do you keep retelling these stories? People, who read here regularly, know these. THIS IS spam. (And it’s also spam, when Butterfly keeps retelling her side of the story). NOBODY here is interested in that.
A question:
Why do you keep saying, that other Lambert fans are very careful or need to keep a low profile? The Q+ section is actually the most active one besides the threads for the movie. And I like to read all the different takes there.
You should be reminded, that it IS a Queen forum. Lambert shouldn’t be the main topic. Yes, he’s part of their story now. But only a part. And only for a few years now. You can talk about everything Q+AL. And some information about Lambert is OK for me.
But I for one don’t think, that a Queen board (or a Q+AL board) is the place to discuss EVERYTHING about Lambert. Therefore you should go to a Lambert site. There are enough of them, I‘ve heard.
Unlike QueenZone, the QOL forum has a nice balance at the moment. It could be a bit more active at times, but if the price is, to have you lot posting over there, I will prefer the occasional silence.
;)
One more thing while I’m on my soapbox. I don’t know if Freddie was officially bisexual or officially homosexual and I really don’t care. Adam has had sex with women. Does that make HIM bisexual? Why is Freddie considered macho and Adam is mocked as a “ladyboy?” Again, I don’t care because I think Adam is very macho. I just don’t get it. Why can’t they both be who they are and be left alone about it. The only reason I point out what Freddie wore is that I am tired of hearing that about Adam.
[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b]
One more thing while I’m on my soapbox. I don’t know if Freddie was officially bisexual or officially homosexual and I really don’t care. Adam has had sex with women. Does that make HIM bisexual? Why is Freddie considered macho and Adam is mocked as a “ladyboy?” Again, I don’t care because I think Adam is very macho. I just don’t get it. Why can’t they both be who they are and be left alone about it. The only reason I point out what Freddie wore is that I am tired of hearing that about Adam.
[/QUOTE]
Why do you actually care, what the runner, happystar, (Garry, ect.) and other haters say?
They tease you. And you fall for it every time. And one or two might even have these opinions. Still: Does it matter?
As for Freddie: He didn’t talk „officially“ about his sexuality.
Yes, sealion it is quieter over there now but I was not the chief offender.
[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b]
Yes, sealion it is quieter over there now but I was not the chief offender.
[/QUOTE]
That term „chief offender“ alone sounds really stupid, you know?
Just to say over on QOL when the movie came out the mod moved some comments out of the movie thread because he was fed up of the argument about Adam having a cameo. When questioned he said he'd seen the movie and wasn't the least bit bothered by Adam being in it and it certainly didn't spoil anything for him but he was annoyed at the ongoing arguing by a couple of people that was derailing the thread and he moved them for that reason. Makes sense to me since on here without a mod threads just end up derailed constantly. He may not like QAL but I don't get the impression he actually hates Adam outside of the Queen collaboration or that he's deliberately banning or picking on people who do like him, there's been some civil discussions over there about him recently and no one's been picked at about them.
[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b]
One more thing while I’m on my soapbox. I don’t know if Freddie was officially bisexual or officially homosexual and I really don’t care. Adam has had sex with women. Does that make HIM bisexual? Why is Freddie considered macho and Adam is mocked as a “ladyboy?” Again, I don’t care because I think Adam is very macho. I just don’t get it. Why can’t they both be who they are and be left alone about it. The only reason I point out what Freddie wore is that I am tired of hearing that about Adam.
[/QUOTE]
Adam is macho? Since when is dressing like a tranny, riding on bikes like a retarded clown or lying on a couching acting like an old whore "macho"? Very macho indeed. I wonder where you have the info that he fucked women? I wonder what women would jump into bad with him. Well we know: Those two lunatic grannie would. He rather fucked a sheep (aka his goat sound maybe) than a woman.
Freddie was may more masculine that this twat
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
Adam is macho? Since when is dressing like a tranny, riding on bikes like a retarded clown or lying on a couching acting like an old whore "macho"? Very macho indeed. I wonder where you have the info that he fucked women? I wonder what women would jump into bad with him. Well we know: Those two lunatic grannie would. He rather fucked a sheep (aka his goat sound maybe) than a woman.
Freddie was may more masculine that this twat
[/QUOTE]
All that stuff is done in fun, he doesn't look like that when he's being interviewed or appearing at award shows for example. And it wasn't women it was one woman out of curiosity.
[QUOTE] [b]rockchic65 wrote:[/b]
Just to say over on QOL when the movie came out the mod moved some comments out of the movie thread because he was fed up of the argument about Adam having a cameo. When questioned he said he'd seen the movie and wasn't the least bit bothered by Adam being in it and it certainly didn't spoil anything for him but he was annoyed at the ongoing arguing by a couple of people that was derailing the thread and he moved them for that reason. Makes sense to me since on here without a mod threads just end up derailed constantly. He may not like QAL but I don't get the impression he actually hates Adam outside of the Queen collaboration or that he's deliberately banning or picking on people who do like him, there's been some civil discussions over there about him recently and no one's been picked at about them.[/QUOTE]
I have 'known' the admin over there for years. He isn't the monster some would have you believe. It's not as if I was Hitler either for what I post or do here.
Sweetcaroline has an issue about QOL and two or three of it's posters, I'm one of them, the main one.She shot herself in the foot right before her ban saying AL isn't accepted on QOL because he's gay. That was a messed up and wrong assumption.
No, it's not my fault she is currently under a year long ban.
You might not listen to my side of the story...but a big thanks to you for making up your own mind about some things that was done over there.
