Why is Q+AL more successful than Q+PR?

snifflese wrote:

Icy, you always bring up covers, that Adam sings cover and if somebody mentions a new gig, you ask if it is a cover? Pretty obvious you don't think much of him singing covers. You always say he should be doing his own new music as if there is something wrong with covers. That is my general impression of your view.

Noone wants to hear his crap dance music. He is a karaoke twat thats all.

snifflese wrote:

Icy, you always bring up covers, that Adam sings cover and if somebody mentions a new gig, you ask if it is a cover? Pretty obvious you don't think much of him singing covers. You always say he should be doing his own new music as if there is something wrong with covers. That is my general impression of your view.

So are you insulted that I ask that?
When he appears and performs he usually singss cover songs. That's a fact. Even the event last weekend he sang more covers than his own music.
Also what is very obvious, you and sweetcaroline go off on me over nothing.

The point is you bash Adam but you think it is perfectly okay for Buble to sing nothing but covers and put out albums with all covers.

So leave Adam alone.

Also there is a video from Spike on Twitter (but no link to copy) praising Adam for his professionalism, creativity and resourcefulness. It is not karaoke to sing Queen music, especially with legendary musicians.

The event in Manila was half covers and half Adam’s solo music.

Icy, you are missing the point. In your post on page 6, you act as if there is nothing wrong with singing covers. It is fine if Buble does it, but you always sound critical when Adam sings covers and you make a point of bringing it up more often than not. If it is OK to sing covers, as in the case of Buble and others, why is it a problem if Adam sings covers? There are many things that are fine for other artists to do, according to you, but you will then turn around and criticize Adam for doing the same thing. I think that is what Caroline was pointing out and you do that.

snifflese wrote:

Icy, you are missing the point. In your post on page 6, you act as if there is nothing wrong with singing covers. It is fine if Buble does it, but you always sound critical when Adam sings covers and you make a point of bringing it up more often than not. If it is OK to sing covers, as in the case of Buble and others, why is it a problem if Adam sings covers? There are many things that are fine for other artists to do, according to you, but you will then turn around and criticize Adam for doing the same thing. I think that is what Caroline was pointing out and you do that.

Where have I said there was anything wrong singing covers? I never have stated any such thing. For someone like you who has claimed to read my posts for nearly a decade, you sure twist what I post.
Did I say it's a problem if AL sings covers? Nope. But if he keeps going the way he is, that is what he will be known for instead of his solo music.
I can't believe what I have to point out to you and sweetcaroline.

SweetCaroline wrote:

The point is you bash Adam but you think it is perfectly okay for Buble to sing nothing but covers and put out albums with all covers.

So leave Adam alone.

Also there is a video from Spike on Twitter (but no link to copy) praising Adam for his professionalism, creativity and resourcefulness. It is not karaoke to sing Queen music, especially with legendary musicians.

Leave Adam alone, LOL. As if I said anything offensive about the guy at all here. Try to get your head out of his ass, he doesn't need you to defend him.

runner_70 wrote:

After all he is destroying a once might band and making them a laughing stock.

Such a laughing stock they've almost sold out their tour for next year already and had to add more seats and extra shows. They aren't a laughing stock in the slightest and they get great reviews from the media, even I'm surprised they don't get some backlash but they don't seem to except from a few fans but they hardly matter in the scheme of things. Seems you see things that just don't exist.

Adam in Manila, December 9, 2018 (videos):

http://adamlamberttv.blogspot.com/2018/12/videos-adam-lambert-in-manila.html?m=1

rockchic65 wrote:

runner_70 wrote:

After all he is destroying a once might band and making them a laughing stock.

Such a laughing stock they've almost sold out their tour for next year already and had to add more seats and extra shows. They aren't a laughing stock in the slightest and they get great reviews from the media, even I'm surprised they don't get some backlash but they don't seem to except from a few fans but they hardly matter in the scheme of things. Seems you see things that just don't exist.

Wow you are getting sane - so you expect them to get backlash??? Why? Secretly you think they are crap too? You are getting there. In those days of fake news I would not be surpised if they pay big bucks for a favourable reviews. Most non Lanebert freaks laugh about this collaboration. It is the most comical cooperation of once mighty musicians ever. Think about U2 replacing them with this twat. Or the Stones. Rolling STones plus Adam Lambert ???? LMFAO. But with Queen it is supposed to work? Queen had a frontman even more iconic than Bono and Jagger.

runner_70 wrote:

Wow you are getting sane - so you expect them to get backlash??? Why? Secretly you think they are crap too? You are getting there. In those days of fake news I would not be surpised if they pay big bucks for a favourable reviews. Most non Lanebert freaks laugh about this collaboration. It is the most comical cooperation of once mighty musicians ever. Think about U2 replacing them with this twat. Or the Stones. Rolling STones plus Adam Lambert ???? LMFAO. But with Queen it is supposed to work? Queen had a frontman even more iconic than Bono and Jagger.

Judging from how Queen were treated by the media in the past and even about the movie I would have expected more aggro from them regarding their collaboration, the media loves to stir things up usually but in this case it didn't happen. I don't think they're in the least bit crap and yeah Freddie was iconic and there's no replacing him but that's the point, Adam never tries to replace him and that's probably why it works and why he doesn't get bad reviews for it.

The lhama is the new singer so he replaces the old singer. He does not play flute does he? He can say he doesnt want to be compared to Freddie but then he should not copy him with things like the crown or the Live Killers leather outfit. It makes him look like a cheap copycat clown

runner_70 wrote:

The lhama is the new singer so he replaces the old singer. He does not play flute does he? He can say he doesnt want to be compared to Freddie but then he should not copy him with things like the crown or the Live Killers leather outfit. It makes him look like a cheap copycat clown

Adam wears leather most of the time and always has, not copying anyone it's just a look he likes the same as a lot of people. You may think he's a replacement but he and the band don't view it that way, that's why they make a point of calling it +, a collaboration between them. He's there to sing Queen music with them so people can see them live nothing more and he doesn't copy Freddie in either voice or persona, anyone seeing the show knows that.

http://www.slimfitjackets.com/image/cache/data/new2018/queen-and-adam-lambert-concert-2018-studded-black-jacket-1000x1059.jpg
http://andrejkoymasky.com/liv/fam/biom4/mercur01/merc1.jpg

Any fool can see that he is a lousy copycat. I wont post a link to the disgusting crwon thing. Just had lunch so I'd have to vomit

That pic of Freddie makes him look like a copycat of biker Marlon Brando. I’ve never seen Adam wearing a cap like that or his bare chest hanging out under a leather jacket.

He has worn leather in most of his solo performances, not just for Queen music.