Queen crest Queenzone

Portland Expo Building, Portland ME. April 28th 1974 (New transfer)

22 posts Page 2 of 2
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
Can anybody with good ears tell me if this is better or worse than the original transfer? The only thing I noticed it that this runs a bit faster
Best of the best http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1109319/best-of-the-best.aspx?page=1
· Member since
24/96 also at www.thetradersden.org/forums/showthread.php?t=146802
· Member since
The first transfer has a significant drop on highs in the left channel, which now is corrected (not by EQ since the noise shape is unaltered).
It just disappeared by using another deck, maybe it was a bug of the first one, although until now it looked like the tape was recorded this way.

I still prefer the first transfer since the residual stereo component is much reduced (about 15 dB less than the side component of the second transfer).
It's not annoying, some may even like a little fake stereo, but I'm not a fan of elliptic stereo correlation.
· Member since
The fact that somebody somehow sneaked in with a Sony TC-110A up their T shirt and made such a nice recording deserves applause.
· Member since
Thanks for the info (and the share of course)
Best of the best http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1109319/best-of-the-best.aspx?page=1
· Member since
Many thanks for this share
· Member since
Thank you very much.