Rhapsody Tour Google Map

You're sick

I think sick it is to capture a fellow poster's name and blame the original poster on what she's writing/doing.
.
just my 2c. think about THAT.
.
SC is a fangirl. yes. obsessed ? not more than i was in the 90s.
did she do any harm. aaaahm... NO.
did she offend anybody ?
.
well, SC'a... you're doing.

“Queen + Adam Lambert's Rhapsody tour will,-expand the parameters of what a live music experience can be," says set designer Ric Lipson. "This new show promises to be their most spectacular yet, an innovative and interactive celebration-“


http://www.antimusic.com/news/19/April/09Queen_+_Adam_Lambert_Headling_Down_Under.shtml

There shows can be dynamic as they want and they will still look cheesy & ridiculous with lady boy!
Take all the hype with a pinch of salt boys & girls !

Flash. wrote:


. . . . Take all the hype with a pinch of salt boys & girls !

What you mean like in the late 70's and 80's when the hype was they had the biggest lighting rigs in the period, but the truth was Genisis, Van Halen and AC/DC all toured with bigger lighting productions

Or we're playing a sold out American tour. . They never sold out an entire US tour.

Maybe you should have had a bag of salt handy back in the day.

Vocal Harmony You are missing the point here, what i meant was the watered down part of Queen (Brian & Roger) make the gimmicks better on stage so the average dumb fan
does not notice how much the band are lacking from the other band members not been around i.e Freddie & John.
Bigger brighter gimmicks are there to compensate for Adam not having a massive personality and talent like Freddie.
And there was Freddie who stole Live Aid back in 1985 with no gimmicks and lights.
Lambert has to have distractions and gimmicks around him to make him look sophisticated and though he is a massive star, laughable ha ha ha

Thanks for your opinion, Flash, but everyone else here has their own. Adam fits superbly with Queen at this point and the show is the best I have ever seen (and I have been to quite a few over the years). 2014 they were really good, 2017 way better and I fully expect this one to be off the charts. At this point Adam fits like a glove! There is a reason the US tour has been sold out for months. Of course, it is Roger and Brian and Queen music, but if Adam were not stellar, people wouldn't pay to see a lacklustre show. You are missing out, but I guess you folks have your videos and such to keep you happy! The rest of us will move on and enjoy what is now being offered! There is no hype, it is an absolutely tremendous musical experience! I can't wait until Aug. 4th!

Snifflese I do not need to be present at a second rate watered down Queen show with a stand in singer when i have witnessed real Queen in all there glory back in the day with Mercury May Deacon & Taylor. Your shows are a complete tribute of the band Queen used to be and i do not take second best.
If that is what floats your boat great but i bet you would not attend a Queen show if Adam was not there?

A second show has been added to Melbourne

http://twitter.com/QueenWillRock/status/1116446049630072840

You don't have to go as that is your choice. I love Queen.but I wouldn't go to see them with Martel or Gaga. I would go to see them if Sebastian Bach sang with them or Bruce Dickinson (he has the right kind of voice), but there are not many singers that can sing all of their music the way Adam can. I really don't know who might sing with them to be honest, so it would just depend. I am not going just because of Adam, but it works for me. I honestly don't think there is anyone right now who could do a better job. Their synergy is just off the charts!

I am sure there is somebody unknown who would be a better fit than the west end tones of Lambert.

Flash. wrote:

I am sure there is somebody unknown who would be a better fit than the west end tones of Lambert.

But why would they want to go looking for someone else even if there is when they're selling out shows as they are and they love touring with Adam, would make no sense at this point.

Flash. wrote:

I am sure there is somebody unknown who would be a better fit than the west end tones of Lambert.

Part of your argument which you've repeated several times is that Lambert shouldn't be on stage with them because he was unknown and, quote "has no pedigree".

Now you want an unknown singer in there. . . . Priceless