[QUOTE] [b]bucsateflon wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]rsmh96 wrote:[/b]
The fact that you dare call yourselves Queen fans and yet feel that it's a-okay to insult the only two active members of the band is sickening.[/QUOTE]
who the fuck called them Queen fans? I know I didn't.
They are stupid Freddie fanboyz, not Queen fans.
[/QUOTE]
I am rather a Freddie Fanboy than a sad Glamtart, a fan of a guy whose career depends on singing covers for ages now
Some of the most famous singers in history have sung covers their whole lives. Some people just have an extraordinary singing ability. Not being a musician or song writer does not diminish their vocal abilities. Adam is not a songwriter and definitely not a musician. He doesn't have to be, as he has the Queen catalog to sing. All he needs is that golden voice. Roger, Adam and Brian all excel at what they do and those three parts make a beautiful whole. You are not a real Queen fan either, as no one who loves Queen should ever say what you do about Brian and Roger. You are at best a Freddie Fan boy! A pretty nasty one at that!
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
Some of the most famous singers in history have sung covers their whole lives. Some people just have an extraordinary singing ability. Not being a musician or song writer does not diminish their vocal abilities. Adam is not a songwriter and definitely not a musician. He doesn't have to be, as he has the Queen catalog to sing. All he needs is that golden voice. Roger, Adam and Brian all excel at what they do and those three parts make a beautiful whole. You are not a real Queen fan either, as no one who loves Queen should ever say what you do about Brian and Roger. You are at best a Freddie Fan boy! A pretty nasty one at that![/QUOTE]
AL doesn't have to be a songwriter, because usually his songs are shit. TwoFux anyone, yep took five people, including AL to come up with that.
The most open and honest solo song AL has ever done is Feel Something, I really like that one, but I will likely get bitched at by you and SweetCaroline for that too.
AL is stuck singing covers usually., even more than his own music. Frankly, he has a lot to break free from.
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
Some people just have an extraordinary singing ability. [/QUOTE]
Too bad The goat does not belong to that group- AS you said he ain't no musician. he is a sad cover singer who sings like a lil girl with a paperthin voice doing vocal acrobatics and singing scales up and down to hide the fact that his voice is just one thing: annoying
I don't like his tone compared to Freddie's but it can't be disputed that the fact he can hit every single note in every single Queen songs for hours on end every night without fail is commendable and incredible. Freddie could never have done that, because while his voice is far fuller he uses damaging technique to project it. Lambert is a technical singer and sings as "correctly" as possible. That allows him to do what he does. I think Lambert sounds better in studio than live, when he doesn't have to sing everything on open vowels. But he's a phenomenal singer.
I disagree as Adam is much better live than recorded. He is pretty much know for his live singing. He can improvise and no two songs are ever sung quite the same. I have seen him on every tour of his and all the Queen tours and recordings don't touch what he does in a concert!
[QUOTE] [b]rsmh96 wrote:[/b]
I don't like his tone compared to Freddie's but it can't be disputed that the fact he can hit every single note in every single Queen songs for hours on end every night without fail is commendable and incredible. Freddie could never have done that, because while his voice is far fuller he uses damaging technique to project it. Lambert is a technical singer and sings as "correctly" as possible. That allows him to do what he does. I think Lambert sounds better in studio than live, when he doesn't have to sing everything on open vowels. But he's a phenomenal singer.[/QUOTE]
Tone is subjective but as to live singing it's universally said he's better live than studio by his fans, too much processing on his voice in the studio for me. I've seen him live and he's brilliant and while his tone is very different to Freddie's (obviously lighter) I still like it. Don't know if you've seen him live but for me his tone sounds different and doesn't pick up on video too well, it tends to clip the highs which can make it sound less full than in reality. That said I'm an 80's rock/metal fan so I like the hair metal vocal sound.
I like 80s hair metal to and i hate lamebutt's tone
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
I like 80s hair metal to and i hate lamebutt's tone[/QUOTE]
Well like I said tone is subjective.
[QUOTE] [b]rockchic65 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
I like 80s hair metal to and i hate lamebutt's tone[/QUOTE]
Well like I said tone is subjective.
[/QUOTE]
It is but his oversinging and being constantly a few sec behind the music is annoying. He is never on track tempo wise. He might do this on purpose I guess but it is totally annoying and offputting. As is his "of the worrlllllldddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd" gymnastics at the end of WATC
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
He can improvise and no two songs are ever sung quite the same![/QUOTE]
But each time they sound annoying. Like sung from a whining lil girl with no power and no emotion. Robot singing
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]rockchic65 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
I like 80s hair metal to and i hate lamebutt's tone[/QUOTE]
Well like I said tone is subjective.
[/QUOTE]
It is but his oversinging and being constantly a few sec behind the music is annoying. He is never on track tempo wise. He might do this on purpose I guess but it is totally annoying and offputting. As is his "of the worrlllllldddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd" gymnastics at the end of WATC
[/QUOTE]
Well on the WATC vid from LA some were complaining he didn't do the vocal acrobatics at the end, damned if he does and damned if he doesn't it seems.
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
I like 80s hair metal to and i hate lamebutt's tone[/QUOTE]
You Mr 70 forget so quickly.
Van Halen, the father's of 80's hair metal replaced their original singer, then replaced the replacement. They also replaced their bassist.
Motley Crüe a major band in the 80's processed a singer with a thin weak voice live. They replaced both him and their drummer for a while. Both founding members.
Whitesnake, a blues band that jumped into the hair metal band wagon. They became huge, but changed members more often then David Coverdale bleached his hair.
The list is endless but we The Circle of Eidolon have no reason to spend time listing them.
Mr 70 with in the style of music you have said you like are all the reasons you dislike what Queen and it's members now do.
In your rush to pour burning oil over the band and those that enjoy what they do you have failed to see that Queen are no different to so many other bands.
Your cloud of hate has hidden so much from you.
We The Circle of Eidolon know that you will learn nothing from this. We feel that if you choose to reply we can guess the tone you will choose. In your reply remember there is no argument
The Circle of Eidolon has spoken
Circle of asswhiping. In comparison to the rotting Queen corpse those bands were still recording new stuff and their replacements were mostly good to great and Legends themselves. And will you really compare replacing Freddie Mercury and a hairmetal Bassist you stupid dick? I had no problems with QPR as it was a credible cooperation of three legends. QAL is just laughable manufactured with someone on the mic who cannot sing Queensongs and sounds like a goat doing do. Thats the Problem not changing members. And now sod off you crackpipe
