Would you travel one hour to see Queen + for free?

Yes of course, why not. If I don't have to take a day off from work, why not.

Woudn't pay for it though.

Yup, no prob. With pleasure!

Yes.

At this stage, for any Queen music to be played live by any of the original members in what remains of their performing lives , the alternative to Queen + AL is nothing at all . Ever .

No.

Nah. I've seen Roger play a load of solo shows close up in tiny venues and even one where Brian guested with him on a few songs, and that's as good as it's ever got for me. I'm happy with my memories, so, no I wouldn't.

Of course I would - living right at one side of the UK on the coast of the North Sea I have to travel at least an hour to the London 02 which is my nearest big touring venues in London, or 2 hours to Wembley; I've done this countless times for tickets I've paid for over the last 30 years so why on earth would I not do it for free tickets to see my ultimate musical heroes Brian May and Roger, regardless of whoever they have on stage with them?

stevelondon20 wrote:

matt z wrote:

John would likely be unrecognized. ^(in an American audience of muck mucks and musical theater former housewives and widows)


* ftr i thought I'd talked to the guy at an EXTREME show near NAMM a couple years back.

Ball cap indoors, sounded too French to be Deacon but i had felt odd speaking to this gent in the center of the pit. He quickly disappeared.

Should've asked him about his basses

Serious?

Yes, but I'm like 99%certain it wasn't him. The French sounding kinda voice suggested it was simply an older professional and enthusiast....who happened to look like Deacon. Blue cap, dark blazer...casual tee if I Remember correctly. It was dense in there.

Come to think of it, the sound was a little strange in there. Possibly cause I was so close.