Sorry guys the only improvement on this album was "Foolin Around" and the rest do not sound any different.
Man Made Paradise does sound muffled and flat, and you barely hear any drums.
Star*
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Apocalipsis_Darko
Well, also another insult...in Never Boring cd the songs from Barcelona, are from the orchestration version, not the original album...
Day dop
[QUOTE] [b]K770i wrote:[/b]
Sorry guys the only improvement on this album was "Foolin Around" and the rest do not sound any different.
Man Made Paradise does sound muffled and flat, and you barely hear any drums.[/QUOTE]
I'm curious, do you have hearing problems, or wear a heading aid? I ask this as I know some Queen fans aren't in their younger years (not that you need to be of a certain age to suffer hearing loss.but the older you get, the more hearing goes...).
It's just, I can't think why you'd not be hearing the album clearly, unless somehow you listened to a poor quality MP3 of the album, but I don't see why you would've done that.
Sorry guys the only improvement on this album was "Foolin Around" and the rest do not sound any different.
Man Made Paradise does sound muffled and flat, and you barely hear any drums.[/QUOTE]
I'm curious, do you have hearing problems, or wear a heading aid? I ask this as I know some Queen fans aren't in their younger years (not that you need to be of a certain age to suffer hearing loss.but the older you get, the more hearing goes...).
It's just, I can't think why you'd not be hearing the album clearly, unless somehow you listened to a poor quality MP3 of the album, but I don't see why you would've done that.
princetom
just had a listen to "man made paradise" shared earlier in this thread.
well, well, well.
i have to say that i actually prefer the original version. not for reasons of musical perfectness. but:
* the original version had that kind of feeling a mr.mercury would have liked to share. there's an tensiounous lead vocal. encompanished with some throat yelling but most beautiful background voice. they oppose until they finally meet.
what's annoying, but still gets used to be accepted is the drum sound. most probably it's that prominent for reaching a special audience. it's an upbeat number, isn't it ? isnt't it some kind of track being worth to be played in a disco in munich some 30+ years ago ?i tend to see it that way. and that's what the mix is all about. a great performance with no excuses to the "undermixed" instruments.
* the remixed version stands more for a man on the piano, a relaxed kind of mood of an over-tempurated performer who is hiding his talent behind that well mixed instruments. or: to get it right: the production seems wanting to treat every note of the composition quite right. seems to equalize any acoustic term of that very performer. dominate the art in it. the previously dominant snare has to share its place within the instrumental mix. but: the vocals should have been more prominent.
.
i hope that makes any sense.
.
p.s.: that very curt cress plays like a machine. an art of it's own !
well, well, well.
i have to say that i actually prefer the original version. not for reasons of musical perfectness. but:
* the original version had that kind of feeling a mr.mercury would have liked to share. there's an tensiounous lead vocal. encompanished with some throat yelling but most beautiful background voice. they oppose until they finally meet.
what's annoying, but still gets used to be accepted is the drum sound. most probably it's that prominent for reaching a special audience. it's an upbeat number, isn't it ? isnt't it some kind of track being worth to be played in a disco in munich some 30+ years ago ?i tend to see it that way. and that's what the mix is all about. a great performance with no excuses to the "undermixed" instruments.
* the remixed version stands more for a man on the piano, a relaxed kind of mood of an over-tempurated performer who is hiding his talent behind that well mixed instruments. or: to get it right: the production seems wanting to treat every note of the composition quite right. seems to equalize any acoustic term of that very performer. dominate the art in it. the previously dominant snare has to share its place within the instrumental mix. but: the vocals should have been more prominent.
.
i hope that makes any sense.
.
p.s.: that very curt cress plays like a machine. an art of it's own !
runner_70
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]K770i wrote:[/b]
Sorry guys the only improvement on this album was "Foolin Around" and the rest do not sound any different.
Man Made Paradise does sound muffled and flat, and you barely hear any drums.[/QUOTE]
When did you last get your hearing tested? Or do you wear a heading aid?
[/QUOTE]
You are an annoying twat. First you wine about being attcked as some do not share your opinion and next thing you do is a lame" get a hearing aid". So your opinion is the be-all-end-all?
[QUOTE] [b]K770i wrote:[/b]
Sorry guys the only improvement on this album was "Foolin Around" and the rest do not sound any different.
Man Made Paradise does sound muffled and flat, and you barely hear any drums.[/QUOTE]
When did you last get your hearing tested? Or do you wear a heading aid?
[/QUOTE]
You are an annoying twat. First you wine about being attcked as some do not share your opinion and next thing you do is a lame" get a hearing aid". So your opinion is the be-all-end-all?
runner_70
[QUOTE] [b]princetom wrote:[/b]
just had a listen to "man made paradise" shared earlier in this thread.
well, well, well.
i have to say that i actually prefer the original version. not for reasons of musical perfectness. but:
* the original version had that kind of feeling a mr.mercury would have liked to share. there's an tensiounous lead vocal. encompanished with some throat yelling but most beautiful background voice. they oppose until they finally meet.
what's annoying, but still gets used to be accepted is the drum sound. most probably it's that prominent for reaching a special audience. it's an upbeat number, isn't it ? isnt't it some kind of track being worth to be played in a disco in munich some 30+ years ago ?i tend to see it that way. and that's what the mix is all about. a great performance with no excuses to the "undermixed" instruments.
* the remixed version stands more for a man on the piano, a relaxed kind of mood of an over-tempurated performer who is hiding his talent behind that well mixed instruments. or: to get it right: the production seems wanting to treat every note of the composition quite right. seems to equalize any acoustic term of that very performer. dominate the art in it. the previously dominant snare has to share its place within the instrumental mix. but: the vocals should have been more prominent.
.
i hope that makes any sense.
.
p.s.: that very curt cress plays like a machine. an art of it's own ! [/QUOTE]
You are spot on!
just had a listen to "man made paradise" shared earlier in this thread.
well, well, well.
i have to say that i actually prefer the original version. not for reasons of musical perfectness. but:
* the original version had that kind of feeling a mr.mercury would have liked to share. there's an tensiounous lead vocal. encompanished with some throat yelling but most beautiful background voice. they oppose until they finally meet.
what's annoying, but still gets used to be accepted is the drum sound. most probably it's that prominent for reaching a special audience. it's an upbeat number, isn't it ? isnt't it some kind of track being worth to be played in a disco in munich some 30+ years ago ?i tend to see it that way. and that's what the mix is all about. a great performance with no excuses to the "undermixed" instruments.
* the remixed version stands more for a man on the piano, a relaxed kind of mood of an over-tempurated performer who is hiding his talent behind that well mixed instruments. or: to get it right: the production seems wanting to treat every note of the composition quite right. seems to equalize any acoustic term of that very performer. dominate the art in it. the previously dominant snare has to share its place within the instrumental mix. but: the vocals should have been more prominent.
.
i hope that makes any sense.
.
p.s.: that very curt cress plays like a machine. an art of it's own ! [/QUOTE]
You are spot on!
MackMantilla
[QUOTE] [b]MercurialFreddie wrote:[/b]
What do you guys think about how all of the instruments on the title track have been mixed? There is more depth and I feel like they tried to emphasize the polyphony and let those instruments breathe more. I like it, although the outro sounds different. Way different.
The same goes for the outro of Man Made Paradise. Polyphony is much clearer now and how lead vocals mix with bv's is much more organic... if you know what I mean.
[/QUOTE]
I really like this new mix, so now I'll order this boxset.
What do you guys think about how all of the instruments on the title track have been mixed? There is more depth and I feel like they tried to emphasize the polyphony and let those instruments breathe more. I like it, although the outro sounds different. Way different.
The same goes for the outro of Man Made Paradise. Polyphony is much clearer now and how lead vocals mix with bv's is much more organic... if you know what I mean.
[/QUOTE]
I really like this new mix, so now I'll order this boxset.
Day dop
[QUOTE] [b]princetom wrote:[/b]
just had a listen to "man made paradise" shared earlier in this thread.
well, well, well.
i have to say that i actually prefer the original version. not for reasons of musical perfectness. but:
* the original version had that kind of feeling a mr.mercury would have liked to share. there's an tensiounous lead vocal. encompanished with some throat yelling but most beautiful background voice. they oppose until they finally meet.
what's annoying, but still gets used to be accepted is the drum sound. most probably it's that prominent for reaching a special audience. it's an upbeat number, isn't it ? isnt't it some kind of track being worth to be played in a disco in munich some 30+ years ago ?i tend to see it that way. and that's what the mix is all about. a great performance with no excuses to the "undermixed" instruments.
* the remixed version stands more for a man on the piano, a relaxed kind of mood of an over-tempurated performer who is hiding his talent behind that well mixed instruments. or: to get it right: the production seems wanting to treat every note of the composition quite right. seems to equalize any acoustic term of that very performer. dominate the art in it. the previously dominant snare has to share its place within the instrumental mix. but: the vocals should have been more prominent.
.
i hope that makes any sense.
.
p.s.: that very curt cress plays like a machine. an art of it's own ! [/QUOTE]
The issue is, you're listening to a shitty MP3 clip. It's not the best way to make a judgement.
just had a listen to "man made paradise" shared earlier in this thread.
well, well, well.
i have to say that i actually prefer the original version. not for reasons of musical perfectness. but:
* the original version had that kind of feeling a mr.mercury would have liked to share. there's an tensiounous lead vocal. encompanished with some throat yelling but most beautiful background voice. they oppose until they finally meet.
what's annoying, but still gets used to be accepted is the drum sound. most probably it's that prominent for reaching a special audience. it's an upbeat number, isn't it ? isnt't it some kind of track being worth to be played in a disco in munich some 30+ years ago ?i tend to see it that way. and that's what the mix is all about. a great performance with no excuses to the "undermixed" instruments.
* the remixed version stands more for a man on the piano, a relaxed kind of mood of an over-tempurated performer who is hiding his talent behind that well mixed instruments. or: to get it right: the production seems wanting to treat every note of the composition quite right. seems to equalize any acoustic term of that very performer. dominate the art in it. the previously dominant snare has to share its place within the instrumental mix. but: the vocals should have been more prominent.
.
i hope that makes any sense.
.
p.s.: that very curt cress plays like a machine. an art of it's own ! [/QUOTE]
The issue is, you're listening to a shitty MP3 clip. It's not the best way to make a judgement.
princetom
on the other hand...
(and i'm writing that to enhance my previous comment, ignoring any intercourse)
on the other hand... they call it "never boring", don't they ? and that snippet alone makes me curious. maybe i'll give it a buy. for taking some wonderful compsitions to a modern age. for pointing out something (like that very bored but most rhytmic, and therefore adorable piano-playing) which one had not a spot on.
(and i'm writing that to enhance my previous comment, ignoring any intercourse)
on the other hand... they call it "never boring", don't they ? and that snippet alone makes me curious. maybe i'll give it a buy. for taking some wonderful compsitions to a modern age. for pointing out something (like that very bored but most rhytmic, and therefore adorable piano-playing) which one had not a spot on.
princetom
@Day dop.
yes i am. but it makes me curious enough to listen to it on a CD on my HiFi.
yes i am. but it makes me curious enough to listen to it on a CD on my HiFi.
Day dop
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]K770i wrote:[/b]
Sorry guys the only improvement on this album was "Foolin Around" and the rest do not sound any different.
Man Made Paradise does sound muffled and flat, and you barely hear any drums.[/QUOTE]
I'm curious, do you have hearing problems, or wear a heading aid? I ask this as I know some Queen fans aren't in their younger years (not that you need to be of a certain age to suffer hearing loss.but the older you get, the more hearing goes...).
It's just, I can't think why you'd not be hearing the album clearly, unless somehow you listened to a poor quality MP3 of the album, but I don't see why you would've done that.
[/QUOTE]
You are an annoying twat. First you wine about being attcked as some do not share your opinion and next thing you do is a lame" get a hearing aid". So your opinion is the be-all-end-all?
[/QUOTE]
Firstly, what I asked was a genuine question. not an attack. I was aware that it might come across the wrong way, so I edited it by time you'd replied that. See above, I just added it there.
it might help if you didn't jump to false conclusions in future.
I'll repeat what I previously said, your annoyance is your problem. Ask yourself why you're annoyed. The answer that doesn't lay blame on someone else will be the first step towards you dealing with your problem.
Surely if you take a step back, you'd be able to see it's rich of you to call anyone a twat, considering you're someone who spends an unhealthy amount of time harassing Lambert fans online... day in, day out, months on end.
Are you not aware that - all in all - your behaviour screams to everyone else is that you have an unhappy life? I suggest you read up on studies of internet trolls. It'll make for uncomfortable reading for you, but it'll enlighten you.
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]K770i wrote:[/b]
Sorry guys the only improvement on this album was "Foolin Around" and the rest do not sound any different.
Man Made Paradise does sound muffled and flat, and you barely hear any drums.[/QUOTE]
I'm curious, do you have hearing problems, or wear a heading aid? I ask this as I know some Queen fans aren't in their younger years (not that you need to be of a certain age to suffer hearing loss.but the older you get, the more hearing goes...).
It's just, I can't think why you'd not be hearing the album clearly, unless somehow you listened to a poor quality MP3 of the album, but I don't see why you would've done that.
[/QUOTE]
You are an annoying twat. First you wine about being attcked as some do not share your opinion and next thing you do is a lame" get a hearing aid". So your opinion is the be-all-end-all?
[/QUOTE]
Firstly, what I asked was a genuine question. not an attack. I was aware that it might come across the wrong way, so I edited it by time you'd replied that. See above, I just added it there.
it might help if you didn't jump to false conclusions in future.
I'll repeat what I previously said, your annoyance is your problem. Ask yourself why you're annoyed. The answer that doesn't lay blame on someone else will be the first step towards you dealing with your problem.
Surely if you take a step back, you'd be able to see it's rich of you to call anyone a twat, considering you're someone who spends an unhealthy amount of time harassing Lambert fans online... day in, day out, months on end.
Are you not aware that - all in all - your behaviour screams to everyone else is that you have an unhappy life? I suggest you read up on studies of internet trolls. It'll make for uncomfortable reading for you, but it'll enlighten you.
runner_70
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]K770i wrote:[/b]
Sorry guys the only improvement on this album was "Foolin Around" and the rest do not sound any different.
Man Made Paradise does sound muffled and flat, and you barely hear any drums.[/QUOTE]
I'm curious, do you have hearing problems, or wear a heading aid? I ask this as I know some Queen fans aren't in their younger years (not that you need to be of a certain age to suffer hearing loss.but the older you get, the more hearing goes...).
It's just, I can't think why you'd not be hearing the album clearly, unless somehow you listened to a poor quality MP3 of the album, but I don't see why you would've done that.
[/QUOTE]
You are an annoying twat. First you wine about being attcked as some do not share your opinion and next thing you do is a lame" get a hearing aid". So your opinion is the be-all-end-all?
[/QUOTE]
Firstly, what I asked was a genuine question. not an attack. I was aware that it might come across the wrong way, so I edited it by time you'd replied that. See above, I just added it there.
it might help if you didn't jump to false conclusions in future.
I'll repeat what I previously said, your annoyance is your problem. Ask yourself why you're annoyed. The answer that doesn't lay blame on someone else will be the first step towards you dealing with your problem.
Surely if you take a step back, you'd be able to see it's rich of you to call anyone a twat, considering you're someone who spends a a disproportionate amount of your life harassing Lambert fans online... day in, day out, months on end. Are you not aware that all that screams to everyone else is that you have an unhappy life? I suggest you read up on studies of internet trolls. It'll make for uncomfortable reading for you, but it'll enlighten you.
[/QUOTE]
You're working in your twat title and you win ;) Analyzing people you don't know while being offtopic. Twat of the highest order.
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]K770i wrote:[/b]
Sorry guys the only improvement on this album was "Foolin Around" and the rest do not sound any different.
Man Made Paradise does sound muffled and flat, and you barely hear any drums.[/QUOTE]
I'm curious, do you have hearing problems, or wear a heading aid? I ask this as I know some Queen fans aren't in their younger years (not that you need to be of a certain age to suffer hearing loss.but the older you get, the more hearing goes...).
It's just, I can't think why you'd not be hearing the album clearly, unless somehow you listened to a poor quality MP3 of the album, but I don't see why you would've done that.
[/QUOTE]
You are an annoying twat. First you wine about being attcked as some do not share your opinion and next thing you do is a lame" get a hearing aid". So your opinion is the be-all-end-all?
[/QUOTE]
Firstly, what I asked was a genuine question. not an attack. I was aware that it might come across the wrong way, so I edited it by time you'd replied that. See above, I just added it there.
it might help if you didn't jump to false conclusions in future.
I'll repeat what I previously said, your annoyance is your problem. Ask yourself why you're annoyed. The answer that doesn't lay blame on someone else will be the first step towards you dealing with your problem.
Surely if you take a step back, you'd be able to see it's rich of you to call anyone a twat, considering you're someone who spends a a disproportionate amount of your life harassing Lambert fans online... day in, day out, months on end. Are you not aware that all that screams to everyone else is that you have an unhappy life? I suggest you read up on studies of internet trolls. It'll make for uncomfortable reading for you, but it'll enlighten you.
[/QUOTE]
You're working in your twat title and you win ;) Analyzing people you don't know while being offtopic. Twat of the highest order.
Day dop
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]K770i wrote:[/b]
Sorry guys the only improvement on this album was "Foolin Around" and the rest do not sound any different.
Man Made Paradise does sound muffled and flat, and you barely hear any drums.[/QUOTE]
I'm curious, do you have hearing problems, or wear a heading aid? I ask this as I know some Queen fans aren't in their younger years (not that you need to be of a certain age to suffer hearing loss.but the older you get, the more hearing goes...).
It's just, I can't think why you'd not be hearing the album clearly, unless somehow you listened to a poor quality MP3 of the album, but I don't see why you would've done that.
[/QUOTE]
You are an annoying twat. First you wine about being attcked as some do not share your opinion and next thing you do is a lame" get a hearing aid". So your opinion is the be-all-end-all?
[/QUOTE]
Firstly, what I asked was a genuine question. not an attack. I was aware that it might come across the wrong way, so I edited it by time you'd replied that. See above, I just added it there.
it might help if you didn't jump to false conclusions in future.
I'll repeat what I previously said, your annoyance is your problem. Ask yourself why you're annoyed. The answer that doesn't lay blame on someone else will be the first step towards you dealing with your problem.
Surely if you take a step back, you'd be able to see it's rich of you to call anyone a twat, considering you're someone who spends a a disproportionate amount of your life harassing Lambert fans online... day in, day out, months on end. Are you not aware that all that screams to everyone else is that you have an unhappy life? I suggest you read up on studies of internet trolls. It'll make for uncomfortable reading for you, but it'll enlighten you.
[/QUOTE]
You're working in your twat title and you win ;) Analyzing people you don't know while being offtopic. Twat of the highest order.[/QUOTE]
I've found from my observations over recent years, whenever a thread is derailed and fucked up, it almost always tends to be down to you. It doesn't go unnoticed even by someone such as myself who only logs on every now and then. I'm fully aware - just like many others from the comments I've seen - that you're a big part of the reason this forum has gone downhill.
Here, some reading for you: https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]K770i wrote:[/b]
Sorry guys the only improvement on this album was "Foolin Around" and the rest do not sound any different.
Man Made Paradise does sound muffled and flat, and you barely hear any drums.[/QUOTE]
I'm curious, do you have hearing problems, or wear a heading aid? I ask this as I know some Queen fans aren't in their younger years (not that you need to be of a certain age to suffer hearing loss.but the older you get, the more hearing goes...).
It's just, I can't think why you'd not be hearing the album clearly, unless somehow you listened to a poor quality MP3 of the album, but I don't see why you would've done that.
[/QUOTE]
You are an annoying twat. First you wine about being attcked as some do not share your opinion and next thing you do is a lame" get a hearing aid". So your opinion is the be-all-end-all?
[/QUOTE]
Firstly, what I asked was a genuine question. not an attack. I was aware that it might come across the wrong way, so I edited it by time you'd replied that. See above, I just added it there.
it might help if you didn't jump to false conclusions in future.
I'll repeat what I previously said, your annoyance is your problem. Ask yourself why you're annoyed. The answer that doesn't lay blame on someone else will be the first step towards you dealing with your problem.
Surely if you take a step back, you'd be able to see it's rich of you to call anyone a twat, considering you're someone who spends a a disproportionate amount of your life harassing Lambert fans online... day in, day out, months on end. Are you not aware that all that screams to everyone else is that you have an unhappy life? I suggest you read up on studies of internet trolls. It'll make for uncomfortable reading for you, but it'll enlighten you.
[/QUOTE]
You're working in your twat title and you win ;) Analyzing people you don't know while being offtopic. Twat of the highest order.[/QUOTE]
I've found from my observations over recent years, whenever a thread is derailed and fucked up, it almost always tends to be down to you. It doesn't go unnoticed even by someone such as myself who only logs on every now and then. I'm fully aware - just like many others from the comments I've seen - that you're a big part of the reason this forum has gone downhill.
Here, some reading for you: https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists
runner_70
Twat bar 3 - listen to your shitty remixes and shut the fuck up
Day dop
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
Twat bar 3 - listen to your shitty remixes and shut the fuck up[/QUOTE]
No, no one is going to "shut the fuck up" on your say so. Not even the Lambert fans who you regularly obsess over and harass.
I've observed that many people have been wanting you to "shut the fuck up" for a long time on this forum. Have you ever considered taking your own advice?
I know, you'd rather troll everyone, day in, day out, in order to take your mind off your miserable existence by inflicting it upon others. I suspect you'd be horrified if you understood how transparent you are to those far more intelligent and educated than yourself. But you don't understand, and I doubt you ever will.
Perhaps it's not the remixes that are shitty, but your speakers that aren't up to scratch. The new remixes certainly sound punchy and clear on my set up. :-)
Twat bar 3 - listen to your shitty remixes and shut the fuck up[/QUOTE]
No, no one is going to "shut the fuck up" on your say so. Not even the Lambert fans who you regularly obsess over and harass.
I've observed that many people have been wanting you to "shut the fuck up" for a long time on this forum. Have you ever considered taking your own advice?
I know, you'd rather troll everyone, day in, day out, in order to take your mind off your miserable existence by inflicting it upon others. I suspect you'd be horrified if you understood how transparent you are to those far more intelligent and educated than yourself. But you don't understand, and I doubt you ever will.
Perhaps it's not the remixes that are shitty, but your speakers that aren't up to scratch. The new remixes certainly sound punchy and clear on my set up. :-)