jayzus.....this thread caught my eye, and then I look at one or two posts per page, because it's degenerated into yet another ridiculous 'Adam' type thread.
Chill, people.
And, any intelligent in depth response to runner_IQ 70 flies over his head anyway. Not worth the trouble.
runner_70 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]K770i wrote:[/b]
Exactly who the fuck was on the mixing desk needs shooting.[/QUOTE]
Why? Because you can't hear the difference between the original version and the new version?
Some examples that I mentioned earlier...
1) The alterations to the synths - be it louder / quieter / added reverb etc
2) The rerecorded bass on many of the tracks (2,4,5,7,10,11)
3) The new more organic sounding drums
4) The OTT reverb removed from Freddie Mercury's voice
How are you not able to hear the differences that others here can? And how is it the person at the mixing desks fault that you can't hear what others can?[/QUOTE]
Stupid idiot. Give it up already you sad wanker
Day dop · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]K770i wrote:[/b]
Exactly who the fuck was on the mixing desk needs shooting.[/QUOTE]
Why? Because you can't hear the difference between the original version and the new version?
Some examples that I mentioned earlier...
1) The alterations to the synths - be it louder / quieter / added reverb etc
2) The rerecorded bass on many of the tracks (2,4,5,7,10,11)
3) The new more organic sounding drums
4) The OTT reverb removed from Freddie Mercury's voice
How are you not able to hear the differences that others here can? And how is it the person at the mixing desks fault that you can't hear what others can?[/QUOTE]
Stupid idiot. Give it up already you sad wanker[/QUOTE]
You have no argument that holds up. All you have is ad hominem.
Irony overload as well...
"Stupid idiot" coming from someone who doesn't understand that dynamics are not subjective.
"Sad wanker" coming someone who spends an unhealthy amount of time on this forum obsessing over Lambert and his fans.
And "give it up" you say? Despite spending so much of your miserable life here, you are clearly disliked and widely regarded as a nuisance.
Baring that in mind - for the long term sufferers that've had to put up with you for so long - how about you take your own advice?
Of course, you won't, because misery loves company!
runner_70 · Member since
EVeryone hears those "Difference" you fuckwhit. But some dont agree with you that it is "better". Got it now ?
Day dop · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
EVeryone hears those "Difference" you fuckwhit. But some dont agree with you that it is "better". Got it now ?[/QUOTE]
Hello again very dim person.
It should come as no surprise to you whatsoever to find that you're incorrect yet again.
For example, did you miss the comment that said, "Sorry guys the only improvement on this album was "Foolin Around" and the rest do not sound any different."?
I think that last part, "the rest do not sound any different", disproves your claim that "EVeryone hears those "Difference"" (btw, "those Difference" is incorrect. It should be "the difference", as I wrote earlier).
.
See? As I said, once again you're incorrect, and I suspect you're so used to being wrong in every way that all you feel you have in your miserable life is people on this forum to take your frustrations out on.
Your original argument was that it sounded "flat", which it does not. Because of disagreement, you had one of your regular tantrums, name calling, throwing out straw man arguments etc, which is the way you've acted on this forum with people ever since you joined.
i suspect this forum is the only place you socialise (for want of a better term). Do you think people here would miss you if you never logged in again?
Star* · Member since
@DayDop Listen we all have opinions so you think the album is different and all for the better i disagree, i think it is a rip off to get fans to buy the album again.
One song has been a great improvement "Foolin Around" the rest of the tracks are either ruined with bad mixing or they sound remain the same. My opinion so i am not ranting about this.
My views to other Queen fans is don't bother buying this album but just enjoy the original copy of Mr Bad Guy the way Freddie approved of it on its release back in 1985.
snelly1 · Member since
Listened to the new mix/re-record on vinyl. A few thoughts, it does sound fuller, better instrument separation, updated drums, bass and more prominent vocals with less reverb.
However, the mix is at times just WEIRD, things pop up suddenly louder seemingly out of nowhere, some synths seem way to loud, stereo field odd at times....nowhere near as good as the Abbey Road remix. Shame as some of these tracks could be real killers in the right hands.
runner_70 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
EVeryone hears those "Difference" you fuckwhit. But some dont agree with you that it is "better". Got it now ?[/QUOTE]
Hello again very dim person.
It should come as no surprise to you whatsoever to find that you're incorrect yet again.
For example, did you miss the comment that said, "Sorry guys the only improvement on this album was "Foolin Around" and the rest do not sound any different."?
I think that last part, "the rest do not sound any different", disproves your claim that "EVeryone hears those "Difference"" (btw, "those Difference" is incorrect. It should be "the difference", as I wrote earlier).
.
See? As I said, once again you're incorrect, and I suspect you're so used to being wrong in every way that all you feel you have in your miserable life is people on this forum to take your frustrations out on.
Your original argument was that it sounded "flat", which it does not. Because of disagreement, you had one of your regular tantrums, name calling, throwing out straw man arguments etc, which is the way you've acted on this forum with people ever since you joined.
i suspect this forum is the only place you socialise (for want of a better term). Do you think people here would miss you if you never logged in again?
[/QUOTE]
Hey fuckwhit- I stand by my comment that MMP sounds atrocious and FLAT: Especially the drums. Fooling around is the same thing. While on the original MMP was full of drumreverb and sounded almost as pompous as Queen (No wonder it started out as a Queen song) the new version sounds like being recorded in a Jazz club. Totally flat. No dynamics whatsoever. End of discussion really. YOU seem to like it more - but wtf cares apart from your elitist bullshit opinion. MMP and the whole MBG from 1985 sounds as Freddie wanted it to sound back then. I doubt he would be pleased that 34 years later some unknown people try to mix it how THEY want it to sound. It is almost grave robbery. But that's what Maylor been doing for 28 years now. I think you would also be pleased if they would re-record older albums with Lamebird on vocals. And you would all enlighten us with your stupidity as it "sounds better the before".
runner_70 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]K770i wrote:[/b]
@DayDop Listen we all have opinions so you think the album is different and all for the better i disagree, i think it is a rip off to get fans to buy the album again.
One song has been a great improvement "Foolin Around" the rest of the tracks are either ruined with bad mixing or they sound remain the same. My opinion so i am not ranting about this.
My views to other Queen fans is don't bother buying this album but just enjoy the original copy of Mr Bad Guy the way Freddie approved of it on its release back in 1985.[/QUOTE]
Spot on! I can already read the looney's comments that you are "wrong" again. utterly ridiculous. I doubt he even has the original pressing back from 1985.
Star* · Member since
@ Runner70 At the end of the day trying to interfere with rock history is totally wrong.
What right do they have to twiddle knobs here and there on mixing desks and fuck Freddie's album up?
I think in all honesty its all about Money and Queen fans are the most ripped off people of all bands ever when it comes to merchandise.
Predictably enough, the irony eludes you once again, straight off the bat.
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]I stand by my comment that MMP sounds atrocious and FLAT: Especially the drums. Fooling around is the same thing. While on the original MMP was full of drumreverb and sounded almost as pompous as Queen (No wonder it started out as a Queen song) the new version sounds like being recorded in a Jazz club. Totally flat. No dynamics whatsoever. End of discussion really. [/QUOTE]
Did you think I'd expect you to ever NOT stand by your initial opinion after hearing a poor quality MP3 clip on the internet?
Even when the CD comes through the post, you'll still stand by your initial opinion. Even if you heard the CD on a decent stereo system and heard how much better it sounds then the original, you'd still never admit you was wrong to pass judgement after hearing an MP3. That's who you are. Of course a poor quality MP3 sounds flat and lacks dynamics. However, the CD certainly does not.
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
YOU seem to like it more - but wtf cares apart from your elitist bullshit opinion. [/QUOTE]
You care.
And you care so much that you resorted to name calling, straw man arguments, and general all-round dummy spitting.
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
MMP and the whole MBG from 1985 sounds as Freddie wanted it to sound back then. I doubt he would be pleased that 34 years later some unknown people try to mix it how THEY want it to sound. It is almost grave robbery. But that's what Maylor been doing for 28 years now. I think you would also be pleased if they would re-record older albums with Lamebird on vocals. And you would all enlighten us with your stupidity as it "sounds better the before". [/QUOTE]
I skimmed through the rest of that nonsense and laughed when I got to the part where you're back to your favourite obsession again. I wonder, do you have posters of Lambert on your wall? You LOVE obsessing over him.
Not that you ever pay attention to anything other than your own one dimensional opinions,but I've said on this forum before that I don't rate Lambert's vocals, I find his singing to be harsh and grating. But according to you, I'd "be pleased if they would re-record older albums with Lamebird on vocals."
If only you paid attention, you might learn something.
Day dop · Member since
Day dop · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]K770i wrote:[/b]
@DayDop Listen we all have opinions so you think the album is different and all for the better i disagree, i think it is a rip off to get fans to buy the album again.
One song has been a great improvement "Foolin Around" the rest of the tracks are either ruined with bad mixing or they sound remain the same. My opinion so i am not ranting about this.
My views to other Queen fans is don't bother buying this album but just enjoy the original copy of Mr Bad Guy the way Freddie approved of it on its release back in 1985.[/QUOTE]
I genuinely don't see how you could think the rest of the tracks sound the same. But never mind.
Surely it'd be better to tell people to listen for themselves rather than to suggest don't bother buying it? The majority of people's opinions I've read consider it an improvement, after all.
Day dop · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
Spot on! I can already read the looney's comments that you are "wrong" again. utterly ridiculous. I doubt he even has the original pressing back from 1985.[/QUOTE]
It's so weird that you call other people all the names that apply to you. Only a loony would act the way you have on this forum for years, y'know, obsessing over Lambert and harassing his fans regularly, trolling etc etc...
Why would you doubt I own an original Mr Bad Guy pressing? It's not like it's rare, is it? Well, you're wrong again regardless.
I guess because you're full of it, you think everyone else is like you. But no.
Here's my original Mr Bad Guy,and also the Special Edition CD...
And here's what I'm listening to it on...
You can't hear that it's an improvement, but most can hear that it's an improvement. And that's fine. :-)
