dysan wrote:
It appears to be the entire performance though - guitar / drums and vocal which makes me believe it's more likely to be a message from the future telling them to stop.
That's a very good point.
dysan wrote:
It appears to be the entire performance though - guitar / drums and vocal which makes me believe it's more likely to be a message from the future telling them to stop.
Holly2003 wrote:
Could be something from the multiverse intruding on our reality. Those fools at CERN, I warned them this would happen! We're doomed, ... doomed!
dysan wrote:
Interesting to see an audience source for the glitch. I'd say it's a delay tower being a dick, but the crowd don't seem that far away.
*scratches head*
rockchic65 wrote:
emrabt wrote:
They've used double tracking since Paul Rogers days, you'll be hard pressed to find a band which doesn't these days, especially an older group whose vocalists are getting a weaker voice. That's where you have a quieter prerecorded vocal just behind the live vocal in parts so it's not as noticeable if you miss a note or anything.
But this does look like Lambert is full on mining.
It's not a backing track they use it's a vocoder type thing that Spike uses (he explained about it in a video it's on Y/tube) where it doubles up the vocals for a fuller sound but live not recorded. This just looks like the track they would use for setting up all the lights, cue's and lasers etc was activated when obviously it shouldn't have been. There were issues getting the sound sorted at rehearsal and then the previous artist ran on longer and the stage was still being set up as Rami was introducing them, far different than their normal tour when they've plenty time to iron out everything and check the equipment properly. As Dysan said Adam's the last person to need lip sync.
dysan wrote:
It appears to be the entire performance though - guitar / drums and vocal which makes me believe it's more likely to be a message from the future telling them to stop.
dysan wrote:
I think that's a fair conclusion. I'm still trying to disprove this however as I feel a little let down by them.
Sealion wrote:
Why does this topic exist twice?
I posted an explanation in the thread with the same topic in the QAL section. If anyone is still wondering, what happened there.
emrabt wrote:
Sealion wrote:
Why does this topic exist twice?
I posted an explanation in the thread with the same topic in the QAL section. If anyone is still wondering, what happened there.
Just to clarify the explanation on the other thread, is it this?:
"The backing track was used for the technicians during pre-show set up but accidentally played the same time as the background screen video"