Low res photos that are worth processing?

15 posts

Thread

Posts in chronological order

Sign in to watch

Watching a topic is how you opt in to reply pushes.

advanced159 15 December 2019 16:24 · Member since December 2007

Saw this thread on reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/queen/comments/eaowzk/queen_ii_cover_photo_in_high_resolution_6000x6000/

And I was thinking about photos in low res that may be worth trying to process?

I did a comparison with a photo from the 14-11-75 Liverpool show

https://i.imgur.com/ehOKlNV.png

mooghead 15 December 2019 20:17 · Member since September 2005

Remove the 's' from https. Or start from the www. Wanker. Are you thick? Has no one told you?

stevelondon20 15 December 2019 22:14 · Member since December 2006

http//i.imgur.com/ehOKlNV.png

stevelondon20 15 December 2019 22:15 · Member since December 2006

I.imgur.com/ehOKlNV.png

stevelondon20 15 December 2019 22:15 · Member since December 2006

I tried! Tempremental it is Robert.

Nathan H 16 December 2019 12:20 · Member since August 2016

https://i.imgur.com/ehOKlNV.png

rhapsody8 16 December 2019 14:38 · Member since July 2005

thanks for the link...

rhapsody8 16 December 2019 15:38 · Member since July 2005

Found some free alternative and result is very nice even in 4X upscale...

ATTACHMENT

201912161754126346.jpg JPG 4.3 MB Members only

rhapsody8 16 December 2019 15:39 · Member since July 2005

ATTACHMENT

20191216503749168.jpg JPG 3.4 MB Members only

rhapsody8 16 December 2019 15:42 · Member since July 2005

ATTACHMENT

20191216651768621.jpg JPG 12.8 MB Members only

rhapsody8 16 December 2019 15:43 · Member since July 2005

ATTACHMENT

20191216917544977.jpg JPG 2.2 MB Members only

rhapsody8 16 December 2019 15:45 · Member since July 2005

ATTACHMENT

201912162128669854.jpg JPG 6.5 MB Members only

rhapsody8 16 December 2019 16:00 · Member since July 2005

ATTACHMENT

20191216384261560.jpg JPG 3.9 MB Members only

thomasquinn 32989 17 December 2019 06:38 · Member since July 2006

mooghead wrote:

Remove the 's' from https. Or start from the www. Wanker. Are you thick? Has no one told you?

Just imagine you'd have to actually highlight the link and right click it to open the page. The horror!

You really are just a lazy, whining sack of sadness, aren't you?

stevelondon20 17 December 2019 07:38 · Member since December 2006

thomasquinn 32989 wrote:

mooghead wrote:

Remove the 's' from https. Or start from the www. Wanker. Are you thick? Has no one told you?

Just imagine you'd have to actually highlight the link and right click it to open the page. The horror!

You really are just a lazy, whining sack of sadness, aren't you?

I think the link thing is hilarious! Makes me chuckle everytime!

Sign in to reply