May - Descending Further Into The Abyss

Brenski Maybe if you were not such a disgusting excuse for a man i would not have to waste my time putting your arrogant views into perspective.
You call it racist because your are Irish, so were all those irish jokes racist in the 70s and 80s then that everybody laughed about then?
Still its ok you calling people and been rude to them but you cannot take it back but guess what Brenski you have bitten off more than you can chew with me because i dont take your shit like Alba1 and Artiside1 i will take you on any day mate.

[QUOTE] [b]ST16 wrote:[/b]Brenski Maybe if you were not such a disgusting excuse for a man i would not have to waste my time putting your arrogant views into perspective.
You call it racist because your are Irish,[/QUOTE]

check again, fuckwit.
the anti-Canadian comment is also included in the "racism list"
of EVERY post I've quoted you. so it's not "because I'm Irish".
it's because YOU'RE A RACIST PIG

why don't you fuck off...and take all your NWI friends with you.

May it be assumed that all involved in this “racism” are white Caucasian of North European descent

[QUOTE] [b]AlbaNo1 wrote:[/b]May it be assumed that all involved in this “racism” are white Caucasian of North European descent[/QUOTE]

and i suppose the irony of *YOUR* post is lost on you? - someone whose username literally translates as [b]No1White[/b].

ho hum

Don’t shout now. That’s what capitalising “you” and “ your” does in written etiquette.

There is no irony. You are all the same race. You are pretending to be offended to strike a moral pose to gain some sort of power.

Yet again you don’t answer any point when it doesn’t suit.

C*nt.

Is it racist to hate Jews? Yes? ... Antisemitism is bad?

Is it racist to hate the Irish? ... Maybe?

Is it racist to hate Canadians? ... Maybe?

Is it racist to hate Americans? Hell no? Americans suck?

Here is a quote from an an article in 2014:

"We litter. We are loud. We are fat. We eat standing up. We drive aggressively. We don’t make eye contact. We don’t open doors for people. We rush. We are rude to wait staff in restaurants. We are prone to domestic violence. We are spoiling for a fight. We put our nose into others’ business. We are sanctimonious. We think we won the War of 1812. We manufacture bad cars, brew bad beer and eat flavorless potato chips. We won’t stop waving the flag. We are bad sports, especially during the Olympics. We think we are the center of the universe, and that money entitles us to everything. But the worst of our sins? We brag—nonstop."

http://www.salon.com/2014/11/28/everybody_hates_americans_my_life_abroad_as_the_maligned_other/

[QUOTE] [b]AlbaNo1 wrote:[/b]

Don’t shout now. That’s what capitalising “you” and “ your” does in written etiquette.

There is no irony. You are all the same race. You are pretending to be offended to strike a moral pose to gain some sort of power.

Yet again you don’t answer any point when it doesn’t suit.

C*nt.
[/QUOTE]

you could've have (just for once) taken the decent route and condemned Gerry's actions. You didn't - because it suits you to get back on your main case, having a fucking go.

not content with irony, i notice you signed yourself off as "C*nt" - probably the most applicable signature ever.

That’s sort of funny. Feel free to use that sign off in future.

Pretty sure your tactic is to keep feeding Gerry enough rope to hang himself.

And you still haven't addressed the point that you are accusing someone of the same race as you as being rascist towards you.
Your philosophy that personal insults and abuse is fine as long as it's not rascist , homophobic etc is entirely manufactured for your own benefit .

[QUOTE] [b]AlbaNo1 wrote:[/b][color=blue][i]Pretty sure your tactic is to keep feeding Gerry enough rope to hang himself.[/i][/color][/QUOTE]no at all...there's no need. idiot has been swinging off his own noose for 5 years - he's been banned at least twice. of that five years, i wasn't here for three. so go figure who the real problem is...instead of hurling your childish accusations at me.

[QUOTE] [b]AlbaNo1 wrote:[/b][color=blue][i]And you still haven't addressed the point that you are accusing someone of the same race as you as being rascist towards you.[/i][/color][/QUOTE]then you have no idea how racism works. none at all. racism is still racism no matter who it's directed at. this isn't about me. there's a anti-Canada quote included. it's about him being a racist and why people don't condemn it. this forum has become a miasmic well of accepted toxicity. challenging the challenger makes you accepting of racism. well fucking done!

[QUOTE] [b]AlbaNo1 wrote:[/b][color=blue][i]Your philosophy that personal insults and abuse is fine as long as it's not rascist , homophobic etc is entirely manufactured for your own benefit.[/i][/color][/QUOTE]no insults aren't fine. i do NOT throw insults at anyone first. i've always maintained that i will only ever return like for like. so whether it's you, aristide, runner_70, Gerry or Florian - you know where the solutions lies: don't insult folk and they have no reason to insult back. your choice.

i think we ALL know what you'll choose - (as a group)...because you've all behaved in the same way - time and again.
you can wipe the slate clean - no more insults and you'll get none in return.

footnote: Gerry did manage to uphold his part in a three-week truce, until I disagreed with him over something. guess what happened next? yep. insults.

now if you don't mind: i'd rather not discuss this any longer. make your choice on the matter. PM me if you like and we'll discuss off thread...who knows, maybe reach some common ground. your call.

@Alba1 Brenski will NOT get the better of me believe me.
He is only here to cause trouble and is no Queen fan point blank.

[QUOTE] [b]ST16 wrote:[/b]@Alba1 Brenski will NOT get the better of me believe me. He is only here to cause trouble and is no Queen fan point blank.[/QUOTE]

ignorant, stalking, lying, fantasist racist - who NEVER saw Queen live.

you told ONE person @Qzone that you saw Queen TWICE: Newcastle 79 and Leeds 82
you told me you saw Queen TWICE
Leeds 82 and Newcastle 86

Now, when you got caught out - you backtrack and try to imply you saw Queen THREE times.

sure, you're a true Queen fan - in your fantasist mind!

Brenski dont patronise me and for the record i will yet again tell you and everybody else on here that i have seen Queen :
Newcastle City Hall - Dec 3 1979
Newcastle St James Football Ground 1986
Birmigham NEC 1984
Leeds - Elland Road - May 29th 1982

Please never accuse me of lies because you just accuse folk of things to start a fight .
Cut down on the drink and drugs for a clearer mind matey.

[QUOTE] [b]ST16 wrote:[/b]Brenski dont patronise me and for the record i will yet again tell you and everybody else on here that i have seen Queen : Newcastle City Hall - Dec 3 1979 Newcastle St James Football Ground 1986 Birmigham NEC 1984 Leeds - Elland Road - May 29th 1982 Please never accuse me of lies because you just accuse folk of things to start a fight . Cut down on the drink and drugs for a clearer mind matey.[/QUOTE] you told lies about the Street Lighting after the Leeds gig. let's face it you shift from one "mistaken" foot to the other, rather than tell the truth and admit you were NOT actually there... [QUOTE] [b]ST16 wrote: 27 Jan 20, 08:37: [/b][color=red]Yeah i attended Elland Road Queen gig on May 29 1982. I remember most of the street lighting was turned off for miles to compensate for Queen's powerful lighting rig and in fact if you look behind Rogers drum kit you will some Street lighting on a distance road turned off as it was quite late when Queen performed. Great memories.[/color][/QUOTE] [QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote: 27 Jan 20, 15:42: [/b][color=green]I'm not sure that was the case. I think the street lighting was off until about 10pm at that time of year anyway, as it doesn't really start to get dark until around that time. Usually, end of May/beginning June the UK sun sets around 9:15pm. There's then a period of twilight called "Civil Twilight", during this period (upto 1 hour) the street lights (they're on darkness sensors) light up - according to how dark each locality is.[/color][/QUOTE] [QUOTE] [b]ST16 wrote: 27 Jan 20, 18:06: [/b][color=red]We came out of the stadium pretty late and it was black outside and many street lights were off, in fact when we were going into the stadium i did see an electrician inside a lamp near the entrance so he must of pulled the fuse out of many lamps around the stadium. Queen's lighting rig i heard put the national grid under considerable pressure around that area.[/color][/QUOTE] [QUOTE] [b]Vocal harmony wrote: 28 Jan 20, 11:43: [/b][color=purple]There was a lot of folklore surrounding Queens lighting rigs in the late 79's and 80's. They were spectacular but both Van Halen and AC/DC toured with bigger rigs than Queen in the early to mid 80's. The stories or assumptions that Queen's lighting put the national grid under strain is not true. I'm not disputing that you walked out into an unlit street. The Works rig was bigger and used more power than The Hot Space rig yet at every arena the dimmers were fed from the venues power supply with out any cut in power, bare in mind that they require a constant supply feed. At outdoor shows the touring production has its own generators to feed the stage with the power required. So the outdoor shows on the Hot Space tour and The Magic tour were not connected to fixed grid power supplies. Another thing to remember in this lighting folklore world is that the most power used in the 1980's at most outdoor shows was used to power the PA, not the lighting. . .[/color][/QUOTE] [QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote: 28 Jan 20, 13:36: [/b][color=green]I'm also curious about this one for an entirely different reason. I used to visit Elland Road in the 80s as an "away" football fan. And before all the modern re-building(s) post Bradford Fire Disaster, I remember Elland Road being a stadium of FOUR ENCLOSED STANDS. As the stage would've been set into one of the terraces, I wonder how outside street lights behind Roger's drum riser could have been visible at all, from inside the stadium. Just managed to find one image of Leeds 1982 - the complete darkness - save for the stage lighting, would indicate the stage IS set against one of the covered terraces. this does appear to show that the stage was set in front one of the four main stands. The reason this makes sense is they started the gig later to avoid the setting sun (in the West) ruining the light show. If this was their concern then it follows that they'd have setup in the East stand.[/color] [color=blue][u]https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/british-rock-group-queen-in-concert-at-leeds-football-club-news-photo/1184650019?adppopup=true[/color][/u][/QUOTE] at the very least, you're a fantasist - at worst a compulsive liar. it's strange how when people talk nicely to you (as above) you invariably trip yourself up with your make-believe rubbish. then, once you realise you've been caught lying you change the subject (to the Milton Keynes gig). classic diversionary bullshit. here's the link: http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1582229/live-89.aspx?page=14 btw - it took TWO of us to prove you wrong. and all of your allegations of myself and VH being the same person...you know where i've worked for 30 years. perhaps you'll accept that VH is a separate person, when he tells you exactly HOW he's qualified to talk about concert equipment? it'll be round about now that you'll either >> drop another racist insult >> accuse me of stalking you (remember, if you didn't keep following me, i'd have nothing to reply to) >> threaten violence racist lying thug!

How’s retirement working out? Busy?