Adam LamBert to guest on Kelly Clarkson show 3/24

Saint Jiub wrote:

Cheers to Young Music Fan for providing the link to this video in another topic in the "Serious" subforum section.

I prefer talk show host James Corden:

http://www.youtube.com/embed/LUuuWyCkS_U

I found some of Adam's cheeses antics at the end of "Somebody to Love" to be a bit annoying, but his interactions with James Corden are very good.

Perhaps it would be better if James Corden toured with QAL.

If this collaboration does come to fruitions ... I think it should be called JCQAL.

JCQAL just kinda rolls off the tongue dontcha think??

Some people really don't get your sarcasm and sense of humor...why am I not surprised ; -).

snifflese wrote:

That was so much fun. I don't know how often I have watched that. I still have it saved on my TV, but to say Corden's voice is superior is quite a stretch. I don't think any voice coach would agree with that assessment. I can't see him, his person or voice, fronting the band permanently, as much as I like and appreciate Corden's talent. His personality is way stronger than his voice, which isn't quite up to the challenge's of Queen's music. I truly believe when everything is taken into consideration, Adam is the best choice. What he, perhaps, lacks in performance, he makes up with that phenomenal voice.

LMAO. I guess SJ's post went over your head. I'm not surprised.

I think Runner said Corden was the better singer? (like three times!) I replied to him, so maybe you missed something there! You always have to get your nasty little digs in, don't you and then you always act so surprised when people react to that. Can't you ever be nice? I guess not, so I am also not surprised!

Corden, Adam & Queen are better together. Two great voices ... and less Adam cheesiness.

JCQAL!!!!

snifflese wrote:

I think Runner said Corden was the better singer? (like three times!) I replied to him, so maybe you missed something there! You always have to get your nasty little digs in, don't you and then you always act so surprised when people react to that. Can't you ever be nice? I guess not, so I am also not surprised!

Although you are retired, grow up.
You seemed to think SJ's post seriously by the way you worded your post, it's pretty much a reply to SJ. Runner didn't even mention J.C joining Q+AL, SJ did in his post, and you obviously took it seriously because of your reply. Of course you won't admit to that, so you go for me again, and no surprise there either. All I said above is that SJ's post went over your head and I'm not surprised. Talk about an overreaction by you, but that's what you do. What has my being nice and getting my nasty little digs have to do with anything at all in here? To try to cover your ass in taking SJ's post seriously. You are overreacting at a post that was obviously sarcastic, and you are overreacting in this reply to me.

This board needs an enema.

The Fairy King wrote:

This board needs an enema.

Don't use the word shit whatever you do ; -)

Deflect all you want, nothing sarcastic at all about your remark. It was mean and meant to make fun of someone. There you go with the shit again. You don't change, do you?

runner_70 wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote:

I posted it on QOL. But it is Lambert, not Lamebert!

Lamebird

--------------------

Lamebird, Lameturd.... who cares

Queenman!! wrote:

runner_70 wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote:

I posted it on QOL. But it is Lambert, not Lamebert!

Lamebird

--------------------

Lamebird, Lameturd.... who cares

I have Lamebird copyright protected. WIll live happily forever after from it

I'd never use these because I don't like them but...

Freddy, Frederick... who cares

^ It's the same idea as Lamebird, Lameturd...

snifflese wrote:

Deflect all you want, nothing sarcastic at all about your remark. It was mean and meant to make fun of someone. There you go with the shit again. You don't change, do you?

I'm not going to be sarcastic with this...
Get a grip, because you overreact about the least little, harmless thing. You were clearly replying to SJ's post even more than runner's, can you admit to that much. You took him seriously, when SJ was clearly being sarcastic. Not that you will admit to that either, so of of course, you do your usual and go after me again, as if what I said was terrible...you are the one who is shit stirring here.

Who cares, Icy? The point is you were LMAO and just plain mean. I don't care how many times you rewrite it to make it not so, but this is what you always do. The only ones you get along with on this board are all the mean ones like yourself for the most part. Have you ever wondered why? Because you are on of them! That is fine, but you try to pretend otherwise which is what annoys me to no end. Own your dislike of Adam and QAL and all Glamberts and then I wouldn't have an issue, but you always deflect and pretend. I have a lot more respect for the others because they don't pretend to be anything but what they are and they know what they like or don't like at this point. They don't try to work both ends like you do. I did not s... stir, I simply added a comment with no hidden meaning or pejoratives towards anyone and then you have to pounce. Just ignore my posts,why don't you? I would really like to scroll you and that way we don't add to any bad vibes on this board. I am done arguing, but that is tough when you are always on the attack, so just ignore me.

Who cares, Icy? The point is you were LMAO and just plain mean. I don't care how many times you rewrite it to make it not so, but this is what you always do. The only ones you get along with on this board are all the mean ones like yourself for the most part. Have you ever wondered why? Because you are on of them! That is fine, but you try to pretend otherwise which is what annoys me to no end. Own your dislike of Adam and QAL and all Glamberts and then I wouldn't have an issue, but you always deflect and pretend. I have a lot more respect for the others because they don't pretend to be anything but what they are and they know what they like or don't like at this point. They don't try to work both ends like you do. I did not s... stir, I simply added a comment with no hidden meaning or pejoratives towards anyone and then you have to pounce. Just ignore my posts,why don't you? I would really like to scroll you and that way we don't add to any bad vibes on this board. I am done arguing, but that is tough when you are always on the attack, so just ignore me.

snifflese wrote:

Who cares, Icy? The point is you were LMAO and just plain mean. I don't care how many times you rewrite it to make it not so, but this is what you always do. The only ones you get along with on this board are all the mean ones like yourself for the most part. Have you ever wondered why? Because you are on of them! That is fine, but you try to pretend otherwise which is what annoys me to no end. Own your dislike of Adam and QAL and all Glamberts and then I wouldn't have an issue, but you always deflect and pretend. I have a lot more respect for the others because they don't pretend to be anything but what they are and they know what they like or don't like at this point. They don't try to work both ends like you do. I did not s... stir, I simply added a comment with no hidden meaning or pejoratives towards anyone and then you have to pounce. Just ignore my posts,why don't you? I would really like to scroll you and that way we don't add to any bad vibes on this board. I am done arguing, but that is tough when you are always on the attack, so just ignore me.

You obviously "care". What's the matter, you can't admit that you pretty much replied to SJ? Oh my LMAO was mean, of course you would think that. Of course you go on a bitchfest once again.
You are overreacting in this thread. Seriously. This is what I mean you see red every time I post.
I get along with rockchic, even though she and I disagreed just recently. I hold nothing against her, because guess what? She doesn't sink to your level, start shit with me. No lie, snifflese you could learn something from her.
You have said at least five times on QZ that you would ignore my posts. It's very telling you have never managed to do it. You get upset over the worst "shit" being used by me. Thing is, I'm sure you have used that word word more than once. You have used 'worse'words, including the time you called me a bitch. The word shit bothers you for some reason.
It's very telling what you notice and cry foul about, and what you don't notice or don't have an issue with. Surprised you aren't screeching at the "tranny" word being used earlier today, but to you come to me ranting at and about me
What I said in this thread wasn't offensive, but you sure take it that way. I'm not surprised by your overreacting here. All you are proving here, is that you look to fight and shit stir with me, even when I say nothing offensive, but your stir the pot by saying I'm all sorts in a new thread to have a go at me. Of course you do.