Freddie Jupiter
Thread
Posts in chronological order
stevelondon20
What a fucking pointless poll.
Nathan H
[QUOTE] [b]stevelondon20 wrote:[/b]
What a fucking pointless poll.[/QUOTE]
I agree, one who didn't like singing and rarely did it and the other who makes a living out of it.
What a fucking pointless poll.[/QUOTE]
I agree, one who didn't like singing and rarely did it and the other who makes a living out of it.
Freddie Jupiter
Freddie Jupiter
Just because John seldom sang doesn't automatically make him a worse vocalist that crapbert. In fact, his vocals on radio ga ga are infinitely more palatable than any vocal from crapbert -- ever.
And going by the poll results a huge number of people seem to agree with me.
And going by the poll results a huge number of people seem to agree with me.
kosimodo
Think of him what u want; the kid can sing. 26 idiots (
(So far) try to tell us that John can/could sing. We queenfans KNOW he absolutely cant.
(So far) try to tell us that John can/could sing. We queenfans KNOW he absolutely cant.
Nathan H
[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
Just because John seldom sang doesn't automatically make him a worse vocalist that crapbert. In fact, his vocals on radio ga ga are infinitely more palatable than any vocal from crapbert -- ever.
And going by the poll results a huge number of people seem to agree with me.[/QUOTE]
I didn't say in that he was a bad singer, but he certainly didn't like it. He could've sang on songs but he chose not to. Why? He can't sing (even he admitted that in several interviews). Solution? Singing lessons. Did he? No.
You're comparing Adam who has sang more than 200 full-length concerts to John whose singing barely exists on record (add it up probably about three or four minutes).
Just because John seldom sang doesn't automatically make him a worse vocalist that crapbert. In fact, his vocals on radio ga ga are infinitely more palatable than any vocal from crapbert -- ever.
And going by the poll results a huge number of people seem to agree with me.[/QUOTE]
I didn't say in that he was a bad singer, but he certainly didn't like it. He could've sang on songs but he chose not to. Why? He can't sing (even he admitted that in several interviews). Solution? Singing lessons. Did he? No.
You're comparing Adam who has sang more than 200 full-length concerts to John whose singing barely exists on record (add it up probably about three or four minutes).
Freddie Jupiter
His singing is very mediocre and positively annoying. I've heard karaoke versions of queen songs done by nobodies who sounded more palatable than crapbert.
Deacy's vocals on radio ga go on the magic tour rock. Don't try to deny it.
Deacy's vocals on radio ga go on the magic tour rock. Don't try to deny it.
Nathan H
[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
His singing is very mediocre and positively annoying. I've heard karaoke versions of queen songs done by nobodies who sounded more palatable than crapbert.
Deacy's vocals on radio ga go on the magic tour rock. Don't try to deny it. [/QUOTE]
I'm not saying it's bad but hearing John's vocals is probably not something he would've wanted but had no say over.
His singing is very mediocre and positively annoying. I've heard karaoke versions of queen songs done by nobodies who sounded more palatable than crapbert.
Deacy's vocals on radio ga go on the magic tour rock. Don't try to deny it. [/QUOTE]
I'm not saying it's bad but hearing John's vocals is probably not something he would've wanted but had no say over.
Freddie Jupiter
So to sum up: Deacy became a better vocalist than crapbert without even trying, and against his will.
matt z
I had guessed this correctly before even clicking the topic. Hahaha
I know it's a petty insane poll...but it's still a little funny
I know it's a petty insane poll...but it's still a little funny
Freddie Jupiter
I'm blown away that it's 70 percent in deacys favour. I would have been quite content with a 50/50 split, actually. It looks as though I've overestimated crapbert's vocal abilities. But that's just me; I tend to go too easy on people.