Surprise, surprise. The majority of fans don't like crapbert. The people have spoken.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Freddie Jupiter wrote:
Surprise, surprise. The majority of fans don't like crapbert. The people have spoken.
Can you prove that no one stuffed the ballot box?
I hope this poll is representative of QZ opinion, but I do not believe that the voting is reliable.
This poll is about as reliable as a Chicago election where the dead vote.
No I can't. I can't prove that somebdy didn't ballot stuff in favour of Adam Lambert either. And neither can you.
Just goes to show many fans are not bothered by the lack of quality Queen is presenting with the awful AL these days.
Some people lack decent taste in music !
Some people lack decent taste in music !
No idea because the options are skewered. I did not vote and thusly cannot see the totals.
Where's the "Ehh, I'm not a big fan of it but whatever.... At least it's got Brian and Roger touring. What the hell's the point of this opinion poll? Isn't it realistically something like at least 10 years later? "
Where's the "Ehh, I'm not a big fan of it but whatever.... At least it's got Brian and Roger touring. What the hell's the point of this opinion poll? Isn't it realistically something like at least 10 years later? "
matt z wrote:No idea because the options are skewered. I did not vote and thusly cannot see the totals.
@matt z this is what it's currently showing:
[color=blue]I love his performing and support B&R's decisions with him (59 votes) 54.6%
I don't like his performing but still respect B&R's decisions with him = IMO a sign of a good fan (28 votes) 25.9%
I hate everything about it (incl. no respect for B&R) = IMO not SMTH a fan would do (21 votes) 19.4%
108 total votes... [/color]
Up to date results are:
I love his performing and support B&R's decisions with him (59 votes) 53.2%
I don't like his performing but still respect B&R's decisions with him = IMO a sign of a good fan (29 votes) 26.1%
I hate everything about it (incl. no respect for B&R) = IMO not SMTH a fan would do (23 votes) 20.7%
I love his performing and support B&R's decisions with him (59 votes) 53.2%
I don't like his performing but still respect B&R's decisions with him = IMO a sign of a good fan (29 votes) 26.1%
I hate everything about it (incl. no respect for B&R) = IMO not SMTH a fan would do (23 votes) 20.7%
Ah. Yeah. Considering the amount of people coming through here is prob < 30 ENGAGING, and maybe 10-20 lurkers plus 5-10 "Gerry" identities it's hardly conclusive even among those 30-50...with some likely "voting twice" or more
Still... it's the same damn topic.
Still... it's the same damn topic.
I just voted and here's the updated results:
I love his performing and support B&R's decisions with him (62 votes) 51.2%
I don't like his performing but still respect B&R's decisions with him = IMO a sign of a good fan (35 votes) 28.9%
I hate everything about it (incl. no respect for B&R) = IMO not SMTH a fan would do (24 votes) 19.8%
I love his performing and support B&R's decisions with him (62 votes) 51.2%
I don't like his performing but still respect B&R's decisions with him = IMO a sign of a good fan (35 votes) 28.9%
I hate everything about it (incl. no respect for B&R) = IMO not SMTH a fan would do (24 votes) 19.8%
Matt Z i only voted the once so please do not slander my name please.
millionaire_waltz wrote:
Matt Z i only voted the once so please do not slander my name please.
he hasn't slandered you, slander is the act of saying something out loud. placing something into written form has it's own word: libel.
Brenski My name is mentioned and that is stirring the shit (see below)
Ah. Yeah. Considering the amount of people coming through here is prob < 30 ENGAGING, and maybe 10-20 lurkers plus 5-10 "Gerry" identities it's hardly conclusive even among those 30-50...with some likely "voting twice" or more
Ah. Yeah. Considering the amount of people coming through here is prob < 30 ENGAGING, and maybe 10-20 lurkers plus 5-10 "Gerry" identities it's hardly conclusive even among those 30-50...with some likely "voting twice" or more
Enigma wrote:
Brenski My name is mentioned and that is stirring the shit (see below)
Gerry, please re-read my post, carefully.
i didn't say it wasn't mentioned.
i was pointing out that you may prefer to use the correct word: libel - instead of slander
[color=red]libel:[/color] a published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a [color=red]written[/color] defamation.
[color=blue]slander:[/color] the action or crime of making a false [color=blue]spoken[/color] statement damaging to a person's reputation.
Ok sorry .
no probs.