Penetration_Guru wrote:
e-man wrote:
. However, as many bands do, a "back up" is often filmed if something malfunctions on the main gig. that way they have access to a safety shot if something should happen.
If anyone was doing that, they would plan to film the first night in full, and then only film bits on the second night if necessary.
Well, anyone that wasn't a time traveller...
Not necessarily. If you are in the same venue two nights in a row, any malfunctions in the production would probably occur the first night and can be ironed out before the next night.
So imo, if you decide to film and release a gig that is a part of a two night stand, I’d say The safer bet for a night without technical glitches is the second night.
But once you’re there with the camera crew already, the first night is both
A: a convenient way to secure extra footage
B: an opportunity to iron out any “challenges” to do with filming. For instance, no matter how well you plan it, actually trying it out in the venue surely must be the best way to find out whether it will go as planned or not. If it’s the latter, then you can change things round.
I have loads of concert films where I’m sure the band wish they had footage from a second gig.
Also, I have some concert films where they use shots from the sound check!
With footage from a second gig, you avoid this.