Queen crest Queenzone

Freddie’s experience with good ole MJ

46 posts Page 3 of 4
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
I didn’t join your forum

I looked at it and most of it is good. Most of your infrequent posts are slightly controlling ,trying to correct others in some way, but generally you hold back.

Instead you post here to argue with posters you consider beneath you , whilst extolling the lofty ideals of the new forum. You are always the other side of the coin.

I’d be more than happy of putting that to a popular neutral vote as to which behavior is hypocritical.

I certainly home in on your posts because you truly are a bully and , yes, a hypocrite. And that should be challenged.
Pity because a lot of your music posts I can relate to.
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]AlbaNo1 wrote:[/b]So if the merits of the music are discussed there,why have you barely posted in Queenchat for a week yet you are all over here battling “trolls” on non music related topics. You can’t see yourself.[/QUOTE]

because people have a right to membership of more than one forum - are you so thick you have no idea how the internet works?

you're pathetic - in the extreme. you've posted here 3 times in 24hrs - and on every occasion it was to reply to me. you'd have no reason to live if i didn't exist, you sad little moron. why don't you try replying to someone else for a change - just to at least put a small element of doubt as to your status as the ridiculously inadequate trolling stalker you prove yourself to be? the fact that you know what i have/haven't posted over at Queenchat is more proof of your stalker. tendencies. what a sad little creature you really are.

must absolutely cripple your twisted little psyche that you can view almost everything at Queenchat - but you can't post anything...because the second you do, we boot your sorry ass out of there. the fact that GPDR regulations applied by Proboards, means that Guest can't view profiles. therefore, you must have joined Queenchat to spy on me... [b]you know how kids often talk at school about what they'll be when they grow up? and many children dream of being scientists, astronauts, doctors, etc. - [i]it's good that you kept your own bar relevantly low.[/i] you strove for and fully achieved your maximum potential by [u]aiming to become an internet troll[/u]. well done on a perfectly-suited life goal.[/b]

the fact that you know what i have/haven't posted over there is more proof of your stalker tendencies. what a sad little creature you really are. no amount of blue pills will help to remove your feeling of impotence at not being able to poison Queenchat with your nasty little asides.

[/QUOTE]
I just read this full post now. What are you on?
I knew you would come back with your “ rights “ to post . I only looked back here because I saw someone else had posted . I knew there was no point in looking at your reply. It would be about your rights.
I knew you would not acknowledge that you were on this forum indulging in disputes on non music matters at the same time as denigrating the forum for the same deficiencies you helped create,
I won’t call you thick, because that would be a direct insult. But you don’t need to join the Queenchat forum to look at the posts. A cursory look through is enough.
· Member since
And as far as “ridiculous drivel” goes , the internet wasn’t invented when I was at school . So I wouldn’t have strived to be an internet troll. But I won’t call you thick. Maybe ...egotistical and deluded.
You are the poison,
· Member since
Jeckleski on Queenchat & Hydeski on QZ?
Socialism: There's one for you, nineteen for me Should five per cent appear too small Be thankful I don't take it all
· Member since
MJ Beat It The End!!!!
· Member since
[QUOTE][color=SaddleBrown] [b]AlbaNo1 wrote:[/b] [i]I didn’t join your forum. I looked at it and most of it is good. Most of your infrequent posts are slightly controlling ,trying to correct others in some way, but generally you hold back.[/i][/color][/QUOTE] [QUOTE] [color=SaddleBrown] [b]AlbaNo1 wrote:[/b] [i]But you don’t need to join the Queenchat forum to look at the posts. A cursory look through is enough.[/i][/color][/QUOTE] 1. you can't see [b][i]most[/i][/b] of anyone's posts as a guest visitor at Queenchat - not unless you're going to spend hours finding >50% of my 400+ posts. Then there's the fact that two parts of our forum require login to access. so your comment amounts to nothing more than your usual rubbish. 2. as admin over there, i have a lot more to do than just posting - which is why the place is ordered and tidy. 3. either you saw [b][i]most of my posts[/i][/b] or you had a [b][i]cursory look[/i][/b] - it can't be both, so quit the BS. 4. instead of making bizarre claims (as to the content/nature of my Queenchat posts)- why don't you post proof of your ridiculous comment: [b][i]"Most of your infrequent posts are slightly controlling"[/b][/i] you accuse me of being a bully, but you're known (here) to argue with the same three/four people - and if they don't post, then your QZ life is utterly bereft of meaning - an excellent example (like your last few) will be your reply to this...nothing for a week at a time, then you turn up to reply to the same folk. you are the very definition of a stalker and a troll. six months ago, I PM'd you to try and reach a civil agreement (of sorts). as i pointed out in my PM - i wasn't here for 3+ years - but you were still falling out with people. i'm not the common denominator here...you are. the plain fact that you couldn't be bothered with the common decency of a reply - says plenty about your QZ raison d'être.
go deo na hÉireann The best QZ epoch: BG17-00 (Before Gerry 1996-2013)
· Member since
I can’t even work the incoming messages on my device Brenski. I also don’t post often. I have been on this forum for around 15 years and still have less than 1000 posts,. So I saw this for the first time when you posted it publicly on another thread which you have done again here.
I wasn’t falling out with people , what on earth are you talking about.
· Member since
Alba - I know you are not a troll. I hope you will not respond.
Socialism: There's one for you, nineteen for me Should five per cent appear too small Be thankful I don't take it all
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Saint Jiub wrote:[/b]Alba - I know you are not a troll. I hope you will not respond.[/QUOTE]

...as predictably as night follows day.

so let me try and understand you: you're content for Alba to make contradictory comments as to my posts at Queenchat, but when i challenge him on his inconsistency - you're in his corner?
go deo na hÉireann The best QZ epoch: BG17-00 (Before Gerry 1996-2013)
· Member since
You seem a more sensitive chap than you would like to make out a Brenski. I will take your second point above and acknowledge the new site does look in order and I am sure you have worked hard on it.
For points one and three they seem the same. I looked through the most recent multiple topics in Queenchat and you had one or two posts at most , on Queenzone you were all over it , mostly engaged in disputes.
There are almost too many points to address here and I don’t have time to write an essay on it.
Let’s just take on example. There are threads on the same topic on both forums about the new live release. Responses among the fans generally range from balanced, mixed or strongly negative. It’s fair to say there’s not many outright positive views. On Queenzone you made an exceptionally provocative and confrontational comment about Freddie Mercury bringing on his own fate and being somehow directly responsible for the AL venture. This is actually trolling because you are clearly looking to generate emotive responses.. Why don’t you post the same on Queenchat.
· Member since
You seem a more sensitive chap than you would like to make out a Brenski. I will take your second point above and acknowledge the new site does look in order and I am sure you have worked hard on it.
For points one and three they seem the same. I looked through the most recent multiple topics in Queenchat and you had one or two posts at most , on Queenzone you were all over it , mostly engaged in disputes.
There are almost too many points to address here and I don’t have time to write an essay on it.
Let’s just take on example. There are threads on the same topic on both forums about the new live release. Responses among the fans generally range from balanced, mixed or strongly negative. It’s fair to say there’s not many outright positive views. On Queenzone you made an exceptionally provocative and confrontational comment about Freddie Mercury bringing on his own fate and being somehow directly responsible for the AL venture. This is actually trolling because you are clearly looking to generate emotive responses.. Why don’t you post the same on Queenchat.
· Member since
[QUOTE] [color=Blue][b]AlbaNo1 wrote:[/b] [i]You seem a more sensitive chap than you would like to make out a Brenski. I will take your second point above and acknowledge the new site does look in order and I am sure you have worked hard on it. For points one and three they seem the same. I looked through the most recent multiple topics in Queenchat and you had one or two posts at most [/i][/color][/QUOTE] Points 1&3 refer directly to your own claim, which you've conveniently sidestepped - for a third time.
i'll remind you:
[QUOTE][color=SaddleBrown] [b]AlbaNo1 wrote:[/b] [i]I didn’t join your forum. I looked at it and most of it is good. Most of your infrequent posts are slightly controlling ,trying to correct others in some way, but generally you hold back.[/i][/color][/QUOTE]so, please - either retract your inaccurate, insulting claim - or provide actual proof.

[QUOTE] [color=Blue][b]AlbaNo1 wrote:[/b] [i] On Queenzone you made an exceptionally provocative and confrontational comment about Freddie Mercury bringing on his own fate and being somehow directly responsible for the AL venture. This is actually trolling because you are clearly looking to generate emotive responses. Why don’t you post the same on Queenchat.[/i][/color][/QUOTE] this was a wholly factual response to someone attacking the current live album. it doesn't matter if an individual is straight/gay/bi - there are STIs out there that can/will kill. the only reason that Paul Rodgers, Adam Lambert or A N Other take mic duties is because Freddie is no more. this is 100% down to his (Freddie's) own promiscuity. there is no need to post any such things on Queenchat, because opinions on current Queen+ projects are respected - without certain individuals adding provacatively-negative comments such as:
[color=red][i][b]¦ "Its the time of the year when we should all cringe yet again Brian May inflicts pain upon his loyal subjects in the shape of a Cd & Dvd of Queen & Adam (Madam) Lambert around the world in seven years worth of footage."
¦ "Well lots of screaming girls like (sweet Caroline ) will probably spend her universal credit money on this utter drivel"
¦ "I certainly will not be buying this pile of shite Queen & Adam Cd/Dvd and seven years on the road because it is still a massive insult to Freddie who got Queen up and running at the beginning and even some Queen fans slagged off "Live Killers" so they will be potty to praise this new release when it gets released on October 2nd. Sad day for real Queen & Freddie fans.[/i][/b][/color]

strange that you never challenge these comments ^. but then, your whole existence here is to challenge the challengers...rather than the wrong-doers.

now - should you continue to dodge your own silly claim/fail to address my response to your comment ([color=SaddleBrown][b]in brown[/b][/color]) above, then i'm out of this one.
go deo na hÉireann The best QZ epoch: BG17-00 (Before Gerry 1996-2013)
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Saint Jiub wrote:[/b]Alba - I know you are not a troll. I hope you will not respond.[/QUOTE]

...as predictably as night follows day.

so let me try and understand you: you're content for Alba to make contradictory comments as to my posts at Queenchat, but when i challenge him on his inconsistency - you're in his corner?



[/QUOTE]

Neither you or Alba had been active in this topic for a week, butsomehow you saw fit to reignite your attacks on Alba.
Socialism: There's one for you, nineteen for me Should five per cent appear too small Be thankful I don't take it all
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b] [QUOTE][color=SaddleBrown] [b]AlbaNo1 wrote:[/b] [i]I didn’t join your forum. I looked at it and most of it is good. Most of your infrequent posts are slightly controlling ,trying to correct others in some way, but generally you hold back.[/i][/color][/QUOTE] [QUOTE] [color=SaddleBrown] [b]AlbaNo1 wrote:[/b] [i]But you don’t need to join the Queenchat forum to look at the posts. A cursory look through is enough.[/i][/color][/QUOTE] 1. you can't see [b][i]most[/i][/b] of anyone's posts as a guest visitor at Queenchat - not unless you're going to spend hours finding >50% of my 400+ posts. Then there's the fact that two parts of our forum require login to access. so your comment amounts to nothing more than your usual rubbish. 2. as admin over there, i have a lot more to do than just posting - which is why the place is ordered and tidy. 3. either you saw [b][i]most of my posts[/i][/b] or you had a [b][i]cursory look[/i][/b] - it can't be both, so quit the BS. 4. instead of making bizarre claims (as to the content/nature of my Queenchat posts)- why don't you post proof of your ridiculous comment: [b][i]"Most of your infrequent posts are slightly controlling"[/b][/i] you accuse me of being a bully, but you're known (here) to argue with the same three/four people - and if they don't post, then your QZ life is utterly bereft of meaning - an excellent example (like your last few) will be your reply to this...nothing for a week at a time, then you turn up to reply to the same folk. you are the very definition of a stalker and a troll. six months ago, I PM'd you to try and reach a civil agreement (of sorts). as i pointed out in my PM - i wasn't here for 3+ years - but you were still falling out with people. i'm not the common denominator here...you are. the plain fact that you couldn't be bothered with the common decency of a reply - says plenty about your QZ raison d'être. [/QUOTE]
Socialism: There's one for you, nineteen for me Should five per cent appear too small Be thankful I don't take it all
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Saint Jiub wrote:[/b][QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Saint Jiub wrote:[/b]Alba - I know you are not a troll. I hope you will not respond.[/QUOTE]

...as predictably as night follows day.

so let me try and understand you: you're content for Alba to make contradictory comments as to my posts at Queenchat, but when i challenge him on his inconsistency - you're in his corner?
[/QUOTE]
Neither you or Alba had been active in this topic for a week, butsomehow you saw fit to reignite your attacks on Alba.
[/QUOTE]
i'd been away for a few days - what's your excuse?
i note you don't condemn Alba for arguing...explain to me why - when you clearly don;t like me in the slightest - you join a forum i created and manage?
go deo na hÉireann The best QZ epoch: BG17-00 (Before Gerry 1996-2013)