Skip to content
Queen crest Queenzone.org

Quenn Live-Ups and Downs

26 posts Page 2 of 2
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum
P
I find the electric drums used, ewspecially in HAmmer to Fall, very unpleasent. IT majkes the sound very weak, and lacks alot of the heaviness of the Magic tour witht he acoustic kit. And where was the gong for Bo Rhap during the magic tour?
can i go to lunch now?
G
Some songs can't be played live fully (like they're supposed to be played anyway)... Death On Two Legs is one of them, and making it a part of a medley was a good decision in my opinion.

I didn't like how they repeated some songs (mostly WWRY, fast and slow) throughout some tours... I'd rather hearing 2 different songs than the same one twice. Yeah, usually it was 1 time at the start and 1 time at the end, and the length of the show (100 mins or more mostly) made you forget you had even heard that song in the first place, but I didn't like it. That was one of the things that caused people to get fed up with WWRY - it was just being played all the time.
"You'll never find rainbows if you're looking down."  -Charlie Chaplin
S
I agree, the piano intro of Death On Two Legs is really amazing on stage, but the rest of the song lacks the strenght it had in the studio
John hated Hot Space. Frederick's favourite singer was not Paul Rodgers. Roger didn't compose 'Innuendo.' 'Bohemian Rhapsody' hasn't got 180 vocal overdubs.
A
Weird. This post was in reply to GH yet it has appeared 2nd from the top. Gulp! Maybe I can see into the future after all!!

Anyway, here's that post again>>>

Nah, I dont like the cutting of songs one bit. About the lack of effects, 90% of their songs live lack all the studio effects and multi layer harmonies.

The best lyrics are in the second verse too. All IMO
My smile as real as a hyena's..........
T
"Nah, I dont like the cutting of songs one bit"

But that's what makes a concert interesting! I think a concert would be boring if you went there to watch a band play the songs exactly as they appear on the record. As Freddie once said, "you can listen to the record at home".

Some of the most brilliant pieces I've ever heard in rock concerts are medleys. Zeppelin played medleys in Whole Lotta Love that lasted a half hour long at times, and they were just incredible. Queen's 20 minute medley on the NOTW tour was their best one, I think. Rush has always put together medleys of songs, and their best was on the Roll The Bones tour in '92 when they combined about 10 old songs into one medley. That's the kind of stuff I want to see at a rock concert. If I want to hear the songs as they are, I'll stay home and crank up the stereo. I go to a concert to be entertained for my money, and changing the songs and having a good stage presentation is what entertains most people at a rock concert.

Of course, this doesn't apply for most of today's pop music. Most fans these days are happy enough to see their favourite star dancing around and lip-synching to their record.
Queenzone is overrun with trolls and circling the drain - join us here instead: http://queenforum.net
W
Nothing more to add, I fully agree with you!
S
And if the bits that are difficult to reproduce on stage are essential: use playback like for 'opera-part' of Bohemian Rhapsody.
Perfect solution.
T
I think that's the only piece in music history that I am in agreement of using an overdub.

I hate overdubs with a passion. It's not playing live... it's a tape. With this song and only this song as an exception, if you can't play it live, you shouldn't play it at all. Rush has this problem, and almost every song they play that's less than 20 years old has keyboard, guitar or vocal overdubs. I realize they're a 3-piece, but they're brilliant musicians, and they should find a way to make it work, without the use of overdubs.
Queenzone is overrun with trolls and circling the drain - join us here instead: http://queenforum.net
K
Yeah, I agree with people who were disappointed that Freddie didn't hit the high note... But when you get used to the fact, his performance is really enticing... and I also hated the part when the show was over... (My least fav song being God Save the Queen in the concerts...)
Goodbye April lady, It's been good to have you around - Goodbye April lady, You've done a lot for the folks in this town...
F
"Yeah, I agree with people who were disappointed that Freddie didn't hit the high note..."

I actually adore all those moments when Fred doesn't hit the high note and he's looking for sth suitable in lower registers... Some of the stuff he came up with was absolutely BRILLIANT! I'm not attending a rock gig to hear everything exactly the same way as on the record. I want to listen to guys, normal ppl, just like me, but a bit more talented... They make mistakes, sometimes they cannot play the exact notes that we know from LPs so they try to change sth... and very often those "re-done" versions, suitable for live situations are far better than studio cuts! Take "White Queen" or "See What A Fool I've Been"- sheer genius! And how about "You Take My Breath Away"- Freddie singing in the lower register made this track something incredibly beutiful!!! I prefer some versions of "Sweet Lady" (Osaka'76?) to ANATO cut... Same with "The Prophet's Song.... Or "In The Lap Of The Gods... Revisited" (70s version) Etc, etc. etc- the list is looong...
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=696327 Wanna trade? Here's my list...
F
Very good point,Fenderek,darling.
"I'm not afraid to speak out and say the things I want and do the things I want,so um,I think in the end that being natural and quite genuine is what wins." Freddie Mercury