Do you ever get defensive when someone picks on someone you care about?

I tried discussing his plan, but both he and you declined that.

Well, look! There you even had a serious respond. And it was for once interesting to read.
I just disagree with the ways you "sell your case", that's all. No one will ever take it seriously the way you two go about, and it is simply impossible to actually discuss your plan, as PG said. I don't say that a 41 year old has to be like this and this, but I honestly expect them to be a bit more mature than a 12 year old.

Dear Penetration_Guru & ~Silje~ ,

I apreciate your input.

P_G the last thing I remembered about that dialog was me asking you what you wanted to know. I waited. You posted no reply before I had to go back to work and I forgot what thread it was on so I haven't even seen your reply. Latey, I've been working more and have not kept up with EveryThing. But I'll try to find it tonight or tomorrow and get back to you.

Now for ~S~, It would do you good to let go of your expectations. Note back to my previous post, People are individuals and not pegs to be placed in a peg board world inwhich our society has become. People who live with rules such as that are generally disapointed and rejects in almost every person whose personality does not meet their idiological definition of the peg holes in their peg board world. This is what I call a form of narrow mindedness.

And something I do believe you are missing about Charles is that his ah yeah and lets get it on is just to let you know he is around to discuss his idea on saving the planet by lessening all the crap that we as humans polute it with and if there were less humans, there would be less polution. His solution is to bring the awareness level and the freedom to choose birth control and have it readily available for every woman in the world. He and I don't even see eye to eye completely on this but the base line is what we have in common. I do think that if we could be so driven to bring all women and men for that matter to a higher awareness of accountablity and bring the active responsiblity up to a higher platue for their sexual appetites would be a good start. However, going about task at hand is allot of work. I'm not sure what the rest of his plan is. I haven't read it in a week or so and I am really tired right now and I am not even sure what I am diolonging right now even makes any sense.

And about being childish. I see it as playfullness. Childish is when you gang up on some one because you don't like them. That is childish.

rosanna- I understand that you think that charles's idea of GIG is a good idea. It could be, I don't know because I haven't bothered to find out. However, you seem to be missing the main issue here.

Charles is spamming out board. It would take a complete idiot not to figure that out. As interesting as his GIG consept may be, the way to spread it is not to post useless topics with sexual names that have a stupid messages such as "ah yeah" or "get it on". If he truly beleives in this gig concept, he should make an intelligent post stating his proposals and reasons.

I understand that you are getting defensive and whatnot, because people keep picking on charles. you don't seem to understand that theres a REASON that they don't like him, and that this board doesn't tolorate spammers. maybe instead of getting all mad at us, you can talk charles into not spamming the board, because if it wasn't for his spamming, no one would be mad at him.

If you are looking for peace, harmony and understanding then you might be better off at www.queenforever.com.
This board has a proud tradition of being cynical, sarcastic and downright unpleasant to fellow fans.
I don't know if you were around when Jake was posting on Queenzone, but if you look back on a few of the posts that weren't deleted you will see that this was a clearly disturbed young man who on a number of occasions threatened to commit suicide.
Not only did we mock him, we actually encouraged him to take his own life. We even went so far as to suggest methods that would prolong his agony and prove entertaining.
That's just the way it is around here and if you don't like it then feel free to fuck off.

fatty.

hehe..-well said fatty!:)

*applauds meluvbooks*

There you have it! :-)

Edit: What she said was what I meant. Now obviously it seems like I was wrong about you, rosanna. Apparently you can make serious responds after all, and you can actually explain what GIG is all about. Therefore I want to appologise for judging you too soon, and instead I will join meluvbooks who just had a wonderful explanation as to why I can't stand Charles. Uhm... I also want to point out that even know we are all on different maturity levels despite our ages, that doesn't mean I have to like you as a person. And quite honestly, the spamming makes me dislike your person, although I like you more now that I've realised you can be serious as well.

Well I wasn't around for the Jake thing but I will try to find some archive on it.

And I'm not angry. I think you're misinterpreting my energy or mood. I do however feel sad about the whole pathetic situation.
And truthfully
I guess I am an idiot because I am under the understanding that spam is the 25 e`fliers of shit I get in my e`mail box each day. As far as I can tell, they all want me to spend money on they're wonder product.
I thought that is what spam is.
But you're saying that anyone who posts their own thread (and not on other peoples' threads) about what ever topic they choose but do the same topic almost every time is spam?
Is that what you are saying?
Really I am very new at this posting thing. I have found it to be an outlet for me and I guess I don't understand the unofficial rules.

So really I am sorry if I have offended you. I really thought we had a freedom of speech thing but maybe it’s not that way at all.
And no I do not agree with his entire gig but I think his heart is in the right place and at least he is one that is thinking about solutions to our global problems.

So please don't shut me out just because a care for the man. He really is a nice guy but some of you seem to have some sort of criteria for how people are supposed to be and act. I just think that is narrow minded that's all.
Plus I have tried to get him to talk dirty to me on an instant messenger but he's not into it.
And I really miss that. That was fun!
sincerely,
rosanna is missing your warm sides and has tired of the coldness in this forum.

Well, yes. Spamming a noticeboard would be to flood the board with topics which make no sense at all, all of them containing a line such as "ah yeah". It makes it difficult to get to the more interesting topics, you see. One topic for each subject would be just wonderful, now I have to search inbetween 5 "ah yeah" topics before I find 1 which contains something else. It gets rather annoying.

So please don't shut me out just because a care for the man. He really is a nice guy but some of you seem to have some sort of criteria for how people are supposed to be and act. I just think that is narrow minded that's all.
Plus I have tried to get him to talk dirty to me on an instant messenger but he's not into it.
And I really miss that. That was fun!
sincerely,
rosanna is missing your warm sides and has tired of the coldness in this forum



Ok he's a nice guy, but we have asked him before to stop starting 10 topics a day about his penis, vagina and this is his last post. As you see most people are getting fed up with some of this shit that has been happening for some time, come to think of it, he's banned from Queenonline, yes, nice people get banned from public boards huh?

O i c
and people would much rather look at your hairy ass. hehe

actually I love a nice hairy ass.

I thought he was only posting on the threads his posts.

Are you saying you have to search all the threads to find something of substance because on my screne I can clearly see who starts what post so his are easy to spot and you can easily avoid them.

simple.

And something I do believe you are missing about Charles is that his ah yeah and lets get it on is just to let you know he is around to discuss his idea on saving the planet

- OK, now we've established he's around. You'll struggle to convince me he's here to discuss anything because he refuses to do so. All you've done is summarise his single webpage. I see no arguments developed, backed up by evidence, research, or any support from anyone (check his guestbook for lots of "playful" disagreement...)

...lessening all the crap that we as humans polute it with....

- You are kidding? he pollutes a family site about Britney Spears with appalling rubbish about genitalia and intercourse and you have the sheer brass neck to accuse others of pollution.

...and if there were less humans, there would be less polution.

- This is the thinking of a five year old. Then again, I see nothing contradicting that in his "messages". Would a better solution not be to concede that population control is probably the hardest thing to achieve on this planet and look for a more practical solution like better education, giving our own children the knowledge with which to start to give the planet back to itself...

His solution is to bring the awareness level and the freedom to choose birth control and have it readily available for every woman in the world.

- How is birth control related to pollution? Anyway, birth control remains something that the Catholic Church has some fairly strong and surprisingly popular views on. I can't see posting "penis weenis" on a few Internet Discussion Boards changing the Pope's views on birth control.

I do think that if we could be so driven to bring all women and men for that matter to a higher awareness of accountablity and bring the active responsiblity up to a higher platue for their sexual appetites would be a good start.

- Sorry, I'll need that translating into legible English, as opposed to a series of buzzwords nailed together at random.

However, going about task at hand is allot of work.

- Do you mean posting "playfully" on here is the task at hand, or enforcing birth control/reeducating the world/getting elected President? Either way I think more than "work" is needed. Psychiatric help would be top of th elist....

I'm not sure what the rest of his plan is.

- I'm not sure anyone is. Including himself.

I haven't read it in a week or so and I am really tired right now and I am not even sure what I am diolonging right now even makes any sense.

- I think now you're entering into the spirit of the original manifesto...

and people would much rather look at your hairy ass. hehe


do you see me starting 10 topics a day telling this to every one?

Oh I give up.

You anti Charles' are all so full of your selves you could never get the point. Why am I wasting my time to get you to open your eyes.

And dude, I was talking about tangible polution. And you p_g are one to talk.
Family web site? give me a break you judgemental pr---.
Barf.

Post script.
penatration yeah thats good and clean. No nastiness there.

I told you I don't agree hole heartedly with his ideas. But the connection between family planning (which I am for being that I am pro life you doe doe) and polution is when there are less people to polute the likely scenerio will be less polution. Thus the connection.
Duh and you can not think that through.

Now I am tired of arguing with a pig head.


reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection

Well said, P_G.

And wstussyb's ass isn't THAT hairy...

*crickets*

um...not that I looked...