Wanna know why the video quality isn't any better on the GVH DVDs?

David Jones has a good point. I would have liked to see them do just a standard Dolby Digital 5.1 and 2.0, and leave the ratios alone, and truly get the best possible video available. Queen was always tops in the music video field, so for what is probably the definitive archive of this work, to have them in this state is a bit sad. I must retract my statement about the music mattering most, LOL

And QueenSite, the Bowie set is truly awesome. I was amazed how super the video quality was, particularly the early BBC stuff.. they must take really good care of their archives. And that one has PCM sound, but no surround mixes.

<

Well, I've examined the GVH2-disc1 and found the following:

1. There are 3 different audio options...
a) LPCM = 944MB (2ch)
b) DTS = 882MB (5ch)
c) AC3 = 112MB (2ch)

2. Subs take up 16MB
3. All Video = 3,334MB

Now, the total for the disc was 5,312MB. The only reason I bring this up, is because that's not much more than a 4.7GB disc. Why have they not gone for bigger 9.4GB discs? At least, this would have given the videos more quality. And probably a little more for DTS as well. Just a little food for thought.

Peace,
Adam.