Queen crest Queenzone

Fake Signatures

12 posts
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
Absolutely, without a doubt........

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3386615871&category=2355
He's my best friend he's my champion
· Member since
i am no expert but that is pretty obvious.
When I grow up, I want to be a gay icon
· Member since
My guess is that he made that first bid himself?
Feel free to visit my site - http://www.mercuryparadise.com (Come into my life, it's a MercuryParadise)
· Member since
Okay, I've never paid close attention to signatures. Can someone point me to a good clear example of the real deal so I can see what's so obvious about this?

I've seen signed stuff on various sites but now that I want to see them I can't find any decent scans.
· Member since
Thanks barry :) I see now that the auction sigs lack distinguishing character as if they might be done by the same person. Is that it? :)

I must say, Freddie's always looks quite nice. I love his F.
· Member since
This seller sell a lot of FAKES signed singles, these signatures are a very poor falsifications and i think he has sold on ebay around ten singles like this, it´s a shame.
REAL ZARAGOZA
· Member since
Not a surprise, this seller is a star in my Hall Of Shame, he sells a huge amount of fakes every week.
http://www.QueenConcerts.com
· Member since
I emailed him and hammered him!

My all time favourite fake has to be NOBY signed by Freddie, that was a classic!!!
Chom own mudder fukker.
· Member since
hmmmm... did he sell Made in Heaven signed by all four, too? :P
"it's better to be hated for who you are, than to be loved for who you're not"
· Member since
I've taken a good look at Martin's website and whilst I agree that there are several 'fakes' in the fakes section the jury must still be out on others - I am not convinced! I maintain that the only way to sort out those in which there are issues/question marks is to get a professional grapholigist involved in the debate. The bottom line is that the signatures (as they do) changed over the years - take a look at your own signature from 10-15 years ago (it will be fairly different: check Freddie's on the genuine page on the 1974 fan club mag as compared to the complete works picture. Also, it is actually very difficult to sign something yourself in 3 different ways - something a grapholigist would identify in seconds. I always base my personal assemsments on signatures from prints of the official signatures and from there you can take a good pot at those. I received signed items from the fan club around 1987/88 and I am totally convinced that they are official - nice crisp, clean and totally consistent with official printed versions. The fact that I had to wait over a year to receive these adds a bit of weight. The bottom line is that it is not easy to fake signatures, these are things that are totally individualistic and complex - those on Ebay are a bloody joke.
He's my best friend he's my champion
· Member since
I pretty much agree with you that a professional graphologist is the only one who could help in these matters. I will try to find somebody who could help.

Whatever the final verdict is, I insist that the fanclub COA has the same "value" as any other COA, which means zero. There are heaps of poor fakes, heaps of perfect genuine signatures but there's always a 5% amount where only a professional can find the truth.
http://www.QueenConcerts.com
· Member since
Good stuff. We'll start the trek for a Queen fan graphologist then!!