50 greatest artists of all time..

well there are some goodies in here but i'll give you one guess as to which goodie isn't....


http://www.rollingstone.com/photos/bigphoto.asp?gid=8355&s=1&e=5&seq=5&cf=

Here's a better link...

http://www.rollingstone.com/features/coverstory/featuregen.asp?pid=2849

OK, so there's...

No Pink Floyd, No AC/DC, No Aerosmith, No Metallica, No Billy Joel, No Guns N' Roses
and NO QUEEN!
Even a constant favorite of Rolling Stone like Eric Clapton failed to make the list.

That's about more than enough to tell you why Rolling Stone SUCKS!

That write-up on the Who was adorable...

euw....metallica...glad they never made the list.

I'm glad Dylan was number 2 anyway. Though he is better than the Beatles.

The fact that there is no mention of Queen figures, It IS Rolling Stone. No Billy Joel however, Is a hell worthy tresspass.

ya know what, i feel i need to start listening to billy joel...i love a wide range of singers/bands/music, but have never listened to billy joela dn loads of you on here love him, so yeh...i'm gonna start listening to billy joel *that is of course when i can go an hour without needing a Queen Song..i'll start then!*

Well everyone knows rolling stone sucks. It has no style.
I much prefer Q or MOJO. Anyone read MOJO's 50 greatest epic rock tracks in this issue, guess what came no.1? alright I'll tell u BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY! As you probably already know, plus included some gorgeous photos. This magazine I like. I wont even go near rolling stone magazine knowing how crap it really is.

I also wrote a letter to the editors. Ooops, I hope I wasn't too rude :P

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Killer Queen .45 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I'm glad Dylan was number 2 anyway. Though he is better than the Beatles.

[/QUOTE]

Reminds me of a 14 year old girl who once said that Zac Hanson is a better drummer than Jason Bonham.