[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Deacon Fan wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I used to think that was funny. Then I saw this:[/QUOTE]
lol that was fucking hilarious! Anyone else think of Monty Python after he says "throw the first stone" ?? :)
Into La Ment · Member since
Hahaha... quality.
I used to love those guys as a kid, though. And I believe I may now have been scarred for life...
The Real Wizard · Member since
I failed to see any humour in the third one. If anything, it was incredibly degrading to people with down syndrome.
Gunpowder Gelatine · Member since
The second one is hilarious. :D
SergeantPepperDG · Member since
Well, I think that the second one was made to teach young girls with down syndrome how their bodies are changing. They have to keep repeating themselves to clarify everything. I don't think it was intended to be offensive.
The Real Wizard · Member since
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]SergeantPepperDG wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Well, I think that the second one was made to teach young girls with down syndrome how their bodies are changing. They have to keep repeating themselves to clarify everything. I don't think it was intended to be offensive.[/QUOTE]
But the only reason they need to repeat themselves is because the girl has down syndrome. Therefore, whoever posted this onto a "humour" website is taking advantage of the girl's condition and trying to use it in humourous ways.
When you break a leg and you can't walk to work in a straight line, I'll be sure to laugh at you.
TheMiracle · Member since
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]SergeantPepperDG wrote: [/QUOTENAME]This is also funny:
The 'period piece' went way too far. That information could have been given without such graphic demonstrations. You know, a doll or something could be used. I have to admit that the repetitive dialogue was quite amusing though.
SergeantPepperDG · Member since
Yeah, it was really graphic. Especially for the 60s! The repetitiveness (is that even a word???) was for a reason though.