He, once again, stands corrected.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
"Coming from a "well informed" person such as Matt, I stand correct!"
I think you wanted to say:
......'I stand corrected'.
Somehow, I don't think so...
I was extremly dissapointed with a lot of Bush's action and thought I would probably vote for whomever ran against him. Then the Dems picked Kerry. And to top it off, the trial lawyer. Guess I was wrong.
"Coming from a "well informed" person such as Matt, I stand correct!"
I think you wanted to say:
......'I stand corrected'.
Wrong-o, sport. I, indeed, stand correct, which means, of course, that you stand INcorrect.
Why were you asking for a country before when there was none? The closest answer would have been the USA, and you dismissed that as wrong. That was very misleading and I want my money back.
Senator John Edwards and the Kerry campaign continue to use Sen. John Kerry’s Vietnam service as the gold standard for trusting Kerry to be Commander in Chief. This is because in time of war no other question is more important in the election for President in 2004.
Edwards offers in a much-repeated ad in battleground states with the statement, "there is no one better prepared than Senator John Kerry to keep America safe."
He further goes on to say that if we have any questions we just need to spend "three minutes" with those veterans that Kerry served with in Vietnam. Now, in defense of the lawyer, Edwards offers a lawyer-like covenant that implies that we should only talk with those veterans who still stand by Kerry today -- instead of saying the swift boat veterans’ picture that Kerry used in his ‘band of brothers’ ad earlier in his campaign.
With the repeated fact that only two of the 19 individuals shown in that ‘band of brothers’ veterans picture by Kerry actually support his campaign for the presidency, why is Kerry continuing with this argument? After all, 11 of the 19 wrote a letter stating that Kerry is unfit to be Commander in Chief. Clearly, the question that boggles the mind of anyone who is paying attention is: Why does Kerry keep alluding to his Vietnam credentials?
Anyone who spends time visiting Vietnam veterans’ websites will soon find out that Sen. John Kerry is not only disliked but is emphatically despised by his brethren and for good reasons:
· There is the fact that Kerry lied in 1971 to Congress about war atrocities committed by his brethren.
· There is the fact that Kerry is recognized in the North Vietnamese War Museum as one of their heroes for helping them defeat the USA and win the war for the Communists.
· There is the fact that Kerry has voted against more than a dozen of the key weapons that are critical to our nation’s defense.
· There is the fact Kerry voted to go to war and then voted against the $87 billion to fund it. (Oh that’s right, he "first voted for it before he voted against it.")
Given the damning evidence of Kerry’s lousy past support of our nation’s defense and the anger and contempt that Vietnam veterans hold towards him, why is Kerry trying this gambit?
Because the media is not talking about any of the damning evidence and if Kerry – or his surrogate, Edwards -- keeps telling his story then people will believe him rather than the facts.
Edwards offers in a much-repeated ad in battleground states with the statement, "there is no one better prepared than Senator John Kerry to keep America safe."
He further goes on to say that if we have any questions we just need to spend "three minutes" with those veterans that Kerry served with in Vietnam. Now, in defense of the lawyer, Edwards offers a lawyer-like covenant that implies that we should only talk with those veterans who still stand by Kerry today -- instead of saying the swift boat veterans’ picture that Kerry used in his ‘band of brothers’ ad earlier in his campaign.
With the repeated fact that only two of the 19 individuals shown in that ‘band of brothers’ veterans picture by Kerry actually support his campaign for the presidency, why is Kerry continuing with this argument? After all, 11 of the 19 wrote a letter stating that Kerry is unfit to be Commander in Chief. Clearly, the question that boggles the mind of anyone who is paying attention is: Why does Kerry keep alluding to his Vietnam credentials?
Anyone who spends time visiting Vietnam veterans’ websites will soon find out that Sen. John Kerry is not only disliked but is emphatically despised by his brethren and for good reasons:
· There is the fact that Kerry lied in 1971 to Congress about war atrocities committed by his brethren.
· There is the fact that Kerry is recognized in the North Vietnamese War Museum as one of their heroes for helping them defeat the USA and win the war for the Communists.
· There is the fact that Kerry has voted against more than a dozen of the key weapons that are critical to our nation’s defense.
· There is the fact Kerry voted to go to war and then voted against the $87 billion to fund it. (Oh that’s right, he "first voted for it before he voted against it.")
Given the damning evidence of Kerry’s lousy past support of our nation’s defense and the anger and contempt that Vietnam veterans hold towards him, why is Kerry trying this gambit?
Because the media is not talking about any of the damning evidence and if Kerry – or his surrogate, Edwards -- keeps telling his story then people will believe him rather than the facts.
You watch WAY too much FOX news. On Hardball with Cris Matthews the other night, the guy who wrote the book "Unfit To Command" was interviewed along with one of the heads of the Vetrans for Kerry.
Contrary to popular belief, the US Navy issued the medals given to Kerry, not the people who served with him. The people who they say were on the boats with him were not. They are nothing but lies perpetrated by the GOP to smear Kerry. There were only 3 people on the Boston Whaler, and I think 6 on the other. The records show (dated 1969) that the men who served with Kerry, and his superiors, indeed say he was a great leader under fire, and lead his men with confidence. The GOP doesn't want you to kow that. They want you to believe the lies they are spreading, and shoot Kerry in the back.
The medals and recomindations were issued by the government. Not the liars who are comming out of the wood work (and being paid a nice sum I might add). So think on that when you fall prey to the propaganda that the current adiministration is spewing.
Contrary to popular belief, the US Navy issued the medals given to Kerry, not the people who served with him. The people who they say were on the boats with him were not. They are nothing but lies perpetrated by the GOP to smear Kerry. There were only 3 people on the Boston Whaler, and I think 6 on the other. The records show (dated 1969) that the men who served with Kerry, and his superiors, indeed say he was a great leader under fire, and lead his men with confidence. The GOP doesn't want you to kow that. They want you to believe the lies they are spreading, and shoot Kerry in the back.
The medals and recomindations were issued by the government. Not the liars who are comming out of the wood work (and being paid a nice sum I might add). So think on that when you fall prey to the propaganda that the current adiministration is spewing.
There are no lies! What lies? Just shut up!
Here, have more of my juice! That's it, open up and swallow our truth! Nice and easy.
Here, have more of my juice! That's it, open up and swallow our truth! Nice and easy.
LOL!
You watch WAY too much FOX news.
Oh man, reminds me of something I read lately... an article on the Fox website said that a recent poll revealed that most democrats are against gay marriage. Anyone who believes that has got to a complete moron, to say the absolute least.
Yes, only Bush can keep the country safe from terrorists.
That statement is just dripping with contradiction, being as Bush is the biggest terrorist of them all.
If Kerry becomes president, that would generally signal a shift in party power and I would wager that Congress would become more Democratic anyway.
But during the Clinton administration I think he had a republican dominated congress.
the only good bush in america right now is the one around hillary's duff.
ermmm jasen has someone gone and converted you to the breeder side????????????
tell me it aint so!
tell me it aint so!