Skip to content
Queen crest Queenzone.org

The Roger Taylor Collection

21 posts
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum

Sign in to watch

Watching a topic is how you opt in to reply pushes.

As we all know Queen Productions released a box set of freddie mercury extras such as the albums the singles, the instrumentals. But I am a huge fan of Queen but I dont know alot about roger like i know about freddie but since a freddie box set is out i wanted to make a roger taylor set also and brian for the future and i need your help to make this collection so far i have

1. Fun In Space
2. Strange Frontier
3. Happiness?
4. Electric Fire
5. The Video Collection
6. Live At The Cyberbarn
7. The Singles 1977-1984

So if anyone could give me a good setlist for an Instrumentals Cd, Some Rareties Cds, and maybe an interview disc

Thanks All
<blank>
and also i am aware that no cross cds are on there i am making a roger taylor collection no a cross that is later
<blank>
does any one know of any rarities or instrumentals, or anything else
<blank>
thank you
<blank>
And about 4 people in the world would buy it.
Guess who's back?
Nah, more like 5. Seriously, don't underestimate Rog's following. Personally, if I'd be forced to choose between the Fred-collection and a Rog-collection, I'd buy the Rog one anyday.
A Roger Taylor Collection would be great more than 5 people would buy maybe like 50,000
<blank>
" don't think there are 20 demos of the Fun In Space sessions, since there are only 5 demos of th Strange Frontier sessions"

This is, ofcourse, bullshit. Not much is known about how much demo's exist. That a few demo's from the SF sessions have leaked doesn't mean that that is all there is.
I'd love to hear work-in-progress songs from all of Roger's sessions, and I think The Cross should be added in, because it was such an integral part of Roger's life (1987 - 1991) and he got three albums plus out of it. No one would buy a Cross box set because no one would have a clue who they are!

But yeah, I'd definitely buy it.
the_hero wrote:
Would be rather boring to have a John deacon box hehehe, there was a Freddie box, because there was a lot of material of Freddie, I don't think there are 20 demos of the Fun In Space sessions, since there are only 5 demos of th Strange Frontier sessions, imagine a Brian box with all the colleborations *yawn*


In addition to what Pim has already said:
Even if there are less Roger-demos than Freddie-demos (which I wouldn't apodictically claim, there weren't THAT many demos on the Freddie-box anyway...), there still are heaps of b-sides and rare mixes, which would be BRILLIANT to have in one box.

An
Philip, I wouldn't normally pick on your spelling as you're a geezer of the highest order, but what the fuck is the wrod "apodictically" doing an impression of?
Penetration_Guru wrote:
I wouldn't normally pick on your spelling...but what the fuck is...wrod?


Sorry, had to do it.
lol, well spotted.
Chom own mudder fukker.
Hmmm...I've to admit that I'm not too sure about the spelling myself. But I've just found the word "apodictic" (self-evident; evident beyond contradiction; alt. spelling: apodeictic) in a dictionary, so it seems to exist. I'm also sure it can be used as an adverb in this context. Was it the adverbial form I got wrong ? Is it "apod(e)icticly" instead ? I thought it would run analogue to "special - specially"...I fear I'm once more caught in the pitfalls of the English language.

Sign in to reply